It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Blind Allegiance": Book chronicling Sarah Palin and her thirst for vengeance

page: 2
8
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 24 2011 @ 04:55 PM
link   
reply to post by weedwhacker
 


Fear Not

Dame Delirious has a snowball's chance

King Oreo will rig the elections
if a comet fails to strike

just like Prince Shrub before him

and don't forget who the real 1st lady is currently

that's right "Robber" Baron Prick's consort

and we all know that everybody who messed with or were a threat
to those Pricks got shafted/ [had a convenient accident]

should Dame Delirious even look like threat the Baroness
will have Dame Delirious thrown under her own tour bus

Omen style.

nice to see you posting for a change


edit on 24-5-2011 by DerepentLEstranger because: added edit




posted on May, 24 2011 @ 05:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
Whats with the unhealthy preoccupation with Sarah Palin........

And im not talking about her supporters...........


Im talking about the people who spend so much time trying to slander, smear and deface her .........its manic



Because she wants to run our country yet she is dishonest ?

Same thing every other candidate gets this same treatment by all people.



posted on May, 25 2011 @ 12:05 AM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


Was, maybe, this thread that kept the Palin "flame" burning, like a horrible blowtorch, into the back of my mind...spurred by the news of the book's release:

www.abovetopsecret.com...


BTW....saw the book author on TV today [***]....if the interview gets uploaded to a hosting site (like, say...YouTube?) will try to find it.....

Adding: Odd....my Chrome Spell Check doesn't 'like' (or, I guess...'recognize') the five-letter combination of "Palin". Ah! Another 'conspiracy'??



[***] OK....here it is (the video I mentioned).


"...her fragile emotional makeup was unnerving. To stay in her good graces, counterattacking anyone who opposed her became top priority. We went after opponents in coordinated attacks, utilizing what we called 'Fox News surrogates': friendly blogs, ghostwritten op-eds, media opinion polls (that we often rigged), letters to editors, and carefully edited speeches....






edit on Wed 25 May 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 25 2011 @ 12:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


Was, maybe, this thread that kept the Palin "flame" burning, like a horrible blowtorch, into the back of my mind...spurred by the news of the book's release:

www.abovetopsecret.com...


BTW....saw the book author on TV today....if the interview gets uploaded to a hosting site (like, say...YouTube?) will try to find it.....

Adding: Odd....my Chrome Spell Check doesn't 'like' (or, I guess...'recognize') the five-letter combination of "Palin". Ah! Another 'conspiracy'??



edit on Wed 25 May 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)


I'm giggling. I know. Sometimes the easy meat satisfies. Frankly though I try to catch what you offer regardless if I agree with it or not as usually you offer logical posts. Keep it up!

CJ



posted on May, 25 2011 @ 01:36 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


I just thought to add.........

I am an equal opportunity person, when corruption is revealed, regardless of political affiliation

This hits home when a (former) rising *star* by the name of John Edwards (Dem) hits the news, as today, that including his rapid fall from grace, as more of his shenanigans are raked up, out of the muck...now, he is facing a possible indictment....

Stay tuned..........

(I actually once had a bit of hope, in Edwards.....bought in to his BS......)



posted on Jun, 5 2011 @ 10:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


I just thought to add.........

I am an equal opportunity person, when corruption is revealed, regardless of political affiliation

This hits home when a (former) rising *star* by the name of John Edwards (Dem) hits the news, as today, that including his rapid fall from grace, as more of his shenanigans are raked up, out of the muck...now, he is facing a possible indictment....

Stay tuned..........

(I actually once had a bit of hope, in Edwards.....bought in to his BS......)


I always took it you were. I am finding a small pocket of humans here on ATS that regardless of political affiliation stand up for individual issues; some leaning one way, some the other, but from a grounded point that may upset, but at least has reason. Also, I have noted that if you have been proven wrong you would be the first to admit it. Doesn't happen often, but I'm just saying it. My two cents...


ColoradoJens



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 09:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
Whats with the unhealthy preoccupation with Sarah Palin........

And im not talking about her supporters...........


Im talking about the people who spend so much time trying to slander, smear and deface her .........its manic


They go after her because she is "credible" and is a capitalist.
This is suppose to be the decade of socialism.



posted on Jun, 13 2011 @ 04:01 PM
link   
reply to post by weedwhacker
 


Hi Weed! Long time, no see (thinking of your posts in the 9-11 forum - good work there BTW). It pains me to say this, but I am going to:

You’re engaging in the very same behavior you take others, quite rightly, to task for in other forums. That is, you’re laying out opinions as fact and counting anyone who doesn't agree with you as one of 'them'. You’re demanding others prove your assertions false; otherwise, you're right by default! It's not up to us, who may disagree with you, to prove you incorrect. The burden of proving your case remains with you, the person making the allegations/assertions. You've accused others of being 'Sara Palin defenders' for merely disagreeing with you. You make an assertion, someone takes the time to offer counter-evidence and you (essentially) belittle them. This stuff is straight out of the 9-11 sub forum.

Honestly man - I am completely sincere here - if I eliminate you as the author and apply 9-11 CT reasoning, I get your counter-responses in this thread. You’re using the exact same argumentative fallacies we have repeatedly pointed out to truthers as invalid. If it's invalid there, it's invalid here. If I wouldn't tolerate it there.....you get the idea.

edit on 13-6-2011 by SlightlyAbovePar because: dam formatting issues




top topics



 
8
<< 1   >>

log in

join