It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Originally posted by coquine
reply to post by hawkiye
..... But I'm confused..... it sounds like you are not in France?? Am I mistaken? I mean the real estate crash and all that which didn't happen here....in France you would be living off your retirement now, going on cruises and such.
The idea of losing that retirement (90% of your salary at time of retirement) in a revolution would probably not make you hurry to join the younguns in destroying the system. Especially if they have no plan for a new system of government they want to install, they just plan on throwing out the present one and........?
edit on 25-5-2011 by coquine because: (no reason given)
No I am in the USA however don't worry France is not far behind you will have your crash too eventually. Those retirements you are talking about are being paid for by others so when they are out of work and all those pensions disappear then you will see the older folks in France up and arms too.
The youngins are misguided they want revolution for hand outs. I just want freedom and a level playing field to make a living as i see fit and keep the government out of my business and from stealing my substance!
Originally posted by CHeGuevara13
Good luck to you all! We need to ge something like this started in times square! Let's get this revolution started! Not one man can change anything but we all could change something
We have a huge baby boomer population which will all be retiring aroudn the age of 50, a heavy financial load for the work force to support, considering people are living to be 80 to 100 years old. Thirty to forty years of a comfy retirement, paid by a smaller population equals no more retirement for the next generation.
Originally posted by wayno
reply to post by coquine
We have a huge baby boomer population which will all be retiring aroudn the age of 50, a heavy financial load for the work force to support, considering people are living to be 80 to 100 years old. Thirty to forty years of a comfy retirement, paid by a smaller population equals no more retirement for the next generation.
By this I take it that you accept the current situation worldwide where 99% of the world's money is in the hands of a relative few; whilst the rest of us struggle to get by on the crumbs. The hard work we have all done has not gone to our own benefit, or to our own future, but for the most part it has fed the coffers of the super rich.
Quit suggesting that we need to squabble amongst ourselves for the scraps. There would be plenty of wealth to go around to ensure that every single person has a good quality of life were it not all being hoarded by a greedy few at the "top".