People need to think - What is the point of bringing down the walls of tyranny in the name of democracy, then in the name of democracy building the
walls of another tyranny ?
Re-painting the walls of the tyranny red instead of blue is not restoring liberty.
The 'revolutions' underway across Europe and the Middle East are not REVOLUTIONS unless they are based on returning national sovereignity and
political power to the people and restoring the values of the nation or Republic -
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, Democracy and Identity.
France must become France again and restore political power to the French people by taking all political, economic and media power away from the
bankers, corporate media and their political puppets.
The values of the Republic must be restored so that France may be reborn !
Then the bankers and the politicians must be put on trial.
The same REVOLUTIONS must be undertaken in all ouir nations - to remove the corrupt politicians, the banker vampires, the zionist fifth agents, the
Islamist terrorists, the corporate media mind controllers, the global capitalists and the liberal left internationalist socialists - all must be
removed from all positions of political influence.
All Power To The People,
All For One, One For All.
That must be our chant as we take our stands.
No revolution that allows the traitors who created the society we live, deserve to take power.
Nor will it - for any revolution that mouths the rhetoric of the left and right is an agent of the enemy itself.
THE REVOLUTION IS A NATIONAL REVOLUTION.
If you want to understand the revolution that is required then you need to study the document that defines and describes the problem and the
It is written by Sub Commandante Marcos of The Zapatistas and is called The Seven Loose Pieces of the Global Jigsaw Puzzle ;
As a world system, neoliberalism is a new war for the conquest of territory. The ending of the third world war - meaning the cold war - in no sense
means that the world has gone beyond the bipolar and found stability under the domination of a single victor. Because, while there was certainly a
defeat (of the socialist camp), it is hard to say who won. The United States? The European Union? Japan? All three?
The defeat of the "evil empire" has opened up new markets, and the struggle over them is leading to a new world war - the fourth.
Like all major conflicts, this war is forcing national states to redefine their identity. The world order seems to have reverted to the earlier epochs
of the conquests of America, Africa and Oceania - a strange modernity, this, which progresses by going backwards. The twilight years of the 20th
century bear more of a resemblance to the previous centuries of barbarism than to the rational futures described in science fiction novels.
Vast territories, wealth and, above all, a huge and available workforce lie waiting for the world’s new master but, while there is only one position
as master on offer, there are many aspiring candidates. And that explains the new war between those who see themselves as part of the "empire of
Unlike the third world war, in which the conflict between capitalism and socialism took place over a variety of terrains and with varying degrees of
intensity, the fourth world war is being conducted between major financial centres in theatres of war that are global in scale and with a level of
intensity that is fierce and constant.
The ineptly-named cold war actually reached very high temperatures: from underground workings of international espionage to the interstellar space of
Ronald Reagan’s famous "Star Wars"; from the sands of the Bay of Pigs in Cuba to the Mekong Delta in Vietnam; from the frenzy of the nuclear arms
race to the vicious coups d’état in Latin America; from the menacing manoeuvres of NATO armies to the machinations of the CIA agents in Bolivia,
where Che Guevara was murdered. The combination of all this led to the socialist camp being undermined as a world system, and to its dissolution as a
The third world war showed the benefits of "total war" for its victor, which was capitalism. In the post-cold war period we see the emergence of a new
planetary scenario in which the principal conflictual elements are the growing importance of no-man’s-lands (arising out of the collapse of the
Eastern bloc countries), the expansion of a number of major powers (the United States, the European Union and Japan), a world economic crisis and a
new technical revolution based on information technology.
Thanks to computers and the technological revolution, the financial markets, operating from their offices and answerable to nobody but themselves,
have been imposing their laws and world-view on the planet as a whole. Globalisation is merely the totalitarian extension of the logic of the finance
markets to all aspects of life. Where they were once in command of their economies, the nation states (and their governments) are commanded - or
rather telecommanded - by the same basic logic of financial power, commercial free trade. And in addition, this logic has profited from a new
permeability created by the development of telecommunications to appropriate all aspects of social activity. At last, a world war which is totally
edit on 25-5-2011 by leejohnbarnes because: (no reason given)