It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
You post a brillant example of the type of misinformation (misdirection) out there that leads people to start believing in conspiracy theories.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Of interest:
"World Trade Center Building 7 is the 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by any planes during the September 11th attacks, but still totally collapsed later the same day. This collapse was not investigated by the 9/11 Commission.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
Quite remarkable and very suspicious is it not
Originally posted by spacevisitor
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Of interest:
"World Trade Center Building 7 is the 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by any planes during the September 11th attacks, but still totally collapsed later the same day. This collapse was not investigated by the 9/11 Commission.
Quite remarkable and very suspicious is it not, because how could a legitimate investigation of 9/11 miss a whole World Trade Center skyscraper collapsing?
edit on 25/5/11 by spacevisitor because: made a correction
Originally posted by roboe
Because the 9/11 Commission was not set up to investigate the mechanical failures of the WTC buildings?
Originally posted by bsbray11
To this day, the most recent polls I've seen indicate that the majority of Americans don't even know what "WTC7" is.
Originally posted by bsbray11
For reference, this is what WTC7 collapsing should have looked like according to NIST's hypothesis (which again can't be independently verified because they withheld their data):
Originally posted by Corrupted Data
Originally posted by spacevisitor
That the majority of Americans don't even know what "WTC7" was is indeed remarkable bsbray11, I think that the reason for that could be is that those people do not look at all the information there is about 911 on the internet, because otherwise they must have known about WTC7.
Looking at the videos posted here, it looks to me as if it did not have collapsed that way.
You see the whole building clearly collapsing vertically as by freefall from out different viewpoints and not the way as it should have looked according to NIST's hypothesis in my opinion.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by spacevisitor
That the majority of Americans don't even know what "WTC7" was is indeed remarkable bsbray11, I think that the reason for that could be is that those people do not look at all the information there is about 911 on the internet, because otherwise they must have known about WTC7.
A good example of this is my own dad. When I first told him that I thought 9/11 was an inside job, he got angry and we got into a pretty heated argument that ended with him saying something like "everything has to be a damned conspiracy." Fast forward a couple years later when we went to the beach together and he was asking me if I had ever seen WTC7 come down. Of course I said "yes" and immediately realized what he was trying to tell me.
Originally posted by bsbray11
He's a mechanic by trade, the most senior and highest paid at the dealership he works at, and rightly prides himself on how quick he can figure out mechanical problems. Up until just recently he's always had a lot of pride in his country too, which I think is why he got so angry when I mentioned it at first. But after seeing WTC7 come down for himself he apparently couldn't deny the obviousness of what he was staring at. The same thing is what originally convinced me a few years earlier.
Originally posted by Carlhole
reply to post by Alfie1
7. Ok, now let's add back in structural strength. How many MORE seconds of collapse time will be required to overcome the immense strength of the towers' undamaged infrastructure below the impact zone? Remember, you have to not only overcome supporting strength but you also have to shred it to bits as well and pulverize all the concrete and other materials to fine powder. All of this work takes energy that is only available from gravitational potential energy if the official story is correct.
Imagine trying to crush and shred the monstrous strength of a WTC Tower's steel infrastructure in 1 second! -- all those immensely strong core columns and peripheral columns tied together in an integral steel framework.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Yeah, you're going to educate me on myself by linking me to a Judy Woods interview. Do you know how much sense that makes? And you're still the king of straw-men.
What is that even supposed to mean? Are you just saying anyone who posts information critical of 9/11 on the internet is dumber than you? Even all the people at Zogby reporting in on these surveys?
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by bsbray11
Yeah, you're going to educate me on myself by linking me to a Judy Woods interview. Do you know how much sense that makes? And you're still the king of straw-men.
You denied that there are people who support the "lasers from outer space" claims and I showed you that people do subscribe to them
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
You "secret hushaboom controlled demolitions" "lasers from outer space" etc etc etc conspiracy people