Washington State National Guard Secret Deployment , page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 23-5-2011 @ 05:49 PM by redrose123
reply to post by Hessling



I don't know if the news reporter know what he is talking about. He said at the end for some of them if could be their 3rd deployment overseas. If that is true it must not be natural diasters at least not in the US.


reply posted on 23-5-2011 @ 06:02 PM by schuyler
Originally posted by redrose123
reply to
post by Hessling



I don't know if the news reporter know what he is talking about. He said at the end for some of them if could be their 3rd deployment overseas. If that is true it must not be natural diasters at least not in the US.


I don't think he knew either. He was just assuming. But it's probably not the rapid response domestic issue either, which is supposed to be composed of 500+ people. This call-up is for 3,000 troops.

I still don't think this can be termed "secret." The three levels are

1. "We might call you up."
2. "Get ready. We WILL call you up." (This is called an "alert.")
3. "You're going to Afghanistan." (This is a "Notice of Deployment.")

This is a Level 1 notification. There's no need to state particulars at this stage. The fact that they have not does not turn this potential deployment into a "secret." If this were a Level 3 Notice of Deployment and they said, "You're going somewhere, but we're not saying where." then THAT would be a secret.


reply posted on 23-5-2011 @ 07:35 PM by SnakeShot
Originally posted by redrose123
reply to
post by Hessling



I don't know if the news reporter know what he is talking about. He said at the end for some of them if could be their 3rd deployment overseas. If that is true it must not be natural diasters at least not in the US.


I think you nailed it on this one. The reporter let the cat out of the bag.
I'm guessing the boarder of Pakistan.

I remember many years ago when I used to think our National State Guards were for guarding our homeland and the regular armed forces were to go overseas.... appearantly I was very wrong.
edit on 23-5-2011 by SnakeShot because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-5-2011 @ 08:50 PM by Signals
reply to post by SnakeShot



I thought that as well....

No offense to any active / reserve / retired but sounds like we should change the name to International Guard.


reply posted on 23-5-2011 @ 10:07 PM by louieprima
reply to post by Signals



National Guard/State Militia units fought in the Spanish American War, World War I, and World War II. Not so much in Vietnam and Korea (although I believe some Air Guard units had some activity in the Cold War Era). Its not new for Guard units to fight overseas. With a "neverending" war on terror, DoD is going to use whatever they have at their disposal - regular armed forces, reserves, private security corporations, proxy rebel fighters or foreign military, and Guardsmen. Unfortunately, with the recent rise in natural events -tornadoes, flooding, hurricanes, drought, fires, etc - we sure could use them at home.
I don't see what the big "secret" is here. Sounds like a potential brigade level call up, which typically means it will become more defined as the alert and eventually mobilization take place. This appears to me to be a mundane everyday occurrence given exaggerated significance by someone who makes his living off of disinfo and paranoia. Then the folks who read/watch his stuff, who don't know anything about the process of guard activation, eat it up.



reply posted on 23-5-2011 @ 10:14 PM by Hessling
reply to post by redrose123



Good catch!

I've re-watched the video.

Now, why would he be reporting about a "secret deployment" when in fact he apparently knew a few things about what was going on. At least more info then the NG's families were receiving.

Also, why the lead-in by the anchorwoman about the possibility of having to go off to war again?

I'm opting out of the whole natural disaster scenario. This appears to be something else.


reply posted on 23-5-2011 @ 10:34 PM by Hessling
reply to post by emberscott



Thanks for catching that emberscott.

I'm from Minnesota too and I was not aware of this.

Over 2,000 soldiers from the Minnesota Army National Guard are leaving to begin training for a one-year deployment overseas.

The soldiers will be supporting Operation New Dawn, which is the drawdown phase of the U.S. military operations in Iraq.

They'll be stationed in Kuwait. And they'll be responsible for providing base management and securing the ground convoys of troops, equipment and supplies throughout Iraq.


Kuwait?

Something tells me that will not be their final destination. And I'm not talking Iraq.

edit on 23-5-2011 by Hessling because: ETA
edit on 23-5-2011 by Hessling because: (no reason given)
edit on 23-5-2011 by Hessling because: ETA



reply posted on 24-5-2011 @ 09:22 AM by louieprima
Guys, look at every state's NG developments and you'll find similar stories all over the country. It isn't a secret and if you look at the past ten years you'll find exactly the same thing. All it means is that things really haven't changed in Afghanistan and Iraq. I wouldn't be surprised if Guard units find themselves in Libya at some point, too, but that is to be expected. There are plenty of real stories out there. This is merely something that happens to every state's NG constantly. Usually it's at the Battalion or Company level(numbers vary depending on type of unit, but alot smaller than brigade or direct reporting unit). In some cases, particularly with infantry, it is a Brigade level mobilization. In Louisiana, we get a brigade level alert every few years. The 256th Infantry Brigade (over 3,000 strong) has been to Iraq twice since Operation Iraqi freedom (Now "Operation New Dawn") began. You are tilting at windmills here if you're looking for anything secret or conspiratorial. There are real secrets and conspiracies out there. All I ask is that you do a little fact checking and informing yourself before assuming that there is a conspiracy behind a little local news station's piece that is really just poorly done. If there was a big secret, why use the Guard instead of regular army units or private security contractors that wouldn't end up on anyone's local news? I mean, if the TPTB are that dumb, we don't have much to worry about.


reply posted on 24-5-2011 @ 07:28 PM by louieprima
reply to post by schuyler



Hahahahahahahahaha!
Also, Congressmen going to a Pacific island on a "mission"? I bet they come back tan and full of antibiotics. And our Defense Industry is selling f16s to allies? Well thats new.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^