It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
What if I don't like someone. I call the cops on a neighbor who doesn't do his lawn or pick up his trash. Or an ex-girlfriend could exact revenge.
The potential for abuse is there.
I'd say
Originally posted by grey580
If you drink and drive then you deserve to be ratted out.
I have no sympathy. You can kill someone. And that someone might be a little kid.
What you gonna do then?
If you had the power to save the life of a child. Wouldn't you?
Originally posted by newcovenant
This means you can turn someone in for swerving and if they are caught driving drunk you get a reward for ratting them out. I think it sets a dangerous precedent myself but curious to see the ATS reaction to this.
edit on 22-5-2011 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by beezzer
What if I don't like someone. I call the cops on a neighbor who doesn't do his lawn or pick up his trash. Or an ex-girlfriend could exact revenge.
The potential for abuse is there.
I'd say
Originally posted by newcovenant
Absolutely but what little kids are out at 3 am?
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by newcovenant
This means you can turn someone in for swerving and if they are caught driving drunk you get a reward for ratting them out. I think it sets a dangerous precedent myself but curious to see the ATS reaction to this.
edit on 22-5-2011 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)
I would like to ask what you think the "danger" would be. I already report anyone I think is driving drunk quite simply because I am on the road with them. I hate when people get killed because an adult cannot make a responsible decision. But I can see how actually encouraging it like this might have some issues. I am just not sure what they might be so hopefully I will find out.
DUI program chief charged with DUI, property damage, leaving the scene of an accident, resisting arrest, and disorderly intoxication
Palm City, FL
The director of a non-profit agency which provides educational services to people on probation for DUI and other misdemeanors has herself been arrested for driving under the influence.
Margot “Peggy” Cioffi, 59, of Palm City, has been suspended as executive director of the Comprehensive Offender Rehabilitation and Education program (CORE) which serves about 5,000 people in Martin, St. Lucie, Okeechobee and Indian River Counties.
Cioffi is charged with DUI with property damage, leaving the scene of an accident with property damage, resisting arrest without violence and disorderly intoxication. Police said her blood alcohol content was 0.336, more than four times Florida’s legal limit of .08 percent.
Police said that Cioffi was involved in an automobile accident about 5:30 p.m. last Monday on Martin Downs Blvd., Palm City. She was arrested about an hour and a half later at her home. Police said she struck another car with her Nissan SUV, drove home and pulled away from a deputy as he tried to handcuff her. The police report says that she screamed so loudly that neighbors came out of their homes due to the commotion.
She has been released from the Martin County Jail on $2,000 bond.
Cioffi was suspended without pay Wednesday pending the outcome of the charges. She has served as CORE’s executive director since 1989 and had previously served as a evaluator and instructor.
WHEREAS, the Honorable BRUCE H. COLTON has also advised the Governor that
Margot Cioffi is the executive director of a not-for-profit corporation that provide misdemeanor
probation services to the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit and he also serves on the board of directors
for this corporation;
Originally posted by newcovenant
Like I mentioned in an earlier post, I turn drunk drivers in myself but the potential for abuse is ratcheted up when you offer a monetary incentive. I won't repeat the whole post but I have gone into detail as to WHY this is a bad idea. I know on the surface it seems like a great idea. They all do though, even the worst of them. Do I need to say Patriot Act?
Originally posted by beezzer
The problem is "safety".
That's the same excuse they used for the Patriot Act, TSA agents.
I mean, who wants to argue against safety?
It's just that while they are making you safe with one hand, the other is taking away your freedoms.
And sure, many will say, "What's the big deal. It's only drunk drivers." And it'll only be drunk drivers until it's people with US flag bumper stickers, gun racks, political affiliation signs.