It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

U.S to protect Pakistani Nuclear Plants...

page: 1
13
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:24 PM
link   

US troops will be deployed in Pakistan if the nation’s nuclear installations come under threat from terrorists out to avenge the killing of Osama Bin Laden, the Sunday Express can reveal.

The plan, which would be activated without President Asif Ali Zardari’s consent, provoked an angry reaction from Pakistan officials last night.


Read more: www.express.co.uk...


Yikes.

A naval/aviation base in Pakistan was attacked today, wasn't it?... What's next?
edit on 22-5-2011 by CanadianDream420 because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:28 PM
link   
OMG
false flag from hell

it's 9/11 happening all over again

when does this chit stop ???



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:29 PM
link   
Might as well accept the fact ground troops will be deployed thar yonder soon.



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:30 PM
link   
It's quite amusing how the US decides when and where they can deploy troops, even at the opposition of said country

Last of my knowledge the USA was merely a Country and not the 'World'



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:33 PM
link   
The pakistanis are not stupid people, theyre just very careless and stubborn. They will let the US watch over their nuclear facilities. less problems for them, but when something does happen then watch them turn against the US.

everyone does this, its called blame.



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:33 PM
link   
If the govt. deployed said troops China might intervene but do they have the power to do anything?

Hmm, seems as if the U.S. govt. is trying to call their bluff



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:35 PM
link   
This has to be a Hoax...because the Timing is too perfect...if this is Article is true,then the attack on the Pakistani Base was definitely ordered by the US.

They aren´t even trying to cover up those things anymore...



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:35 PM
link   
He wasn't right on the money but it fits close enough with me with Ron Paul saying he fear the US will invade Pakistan next



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:40 PM
link   
Question:

How much, in terms of reactor fuel and energy-generation potential, do those Pakistani warheads contain?

With oil and other fossil-fuels becoming ever scarcer and increasing in price, a dollar-aid package in return for weapons-enriched fissionable material (under the guise of global security fears) would go a long way to solve a coming energy crisis

It's been done before with Russia under the 'Megatons to Megawatts' initiative



Nuclear twist: when Russia's old warheads warm US homes

In a strange twist of Cold War enmity on the melt, uranium from what once were Russian nuclear warheads is used to heat and light American homes, thanks to the Megatons to Megawatts Program -- a successful example of nuclear non-proliferation.

The 20-year agreement was signed back in 1994 between Russia and the United States.

"Megatons to Megawatts is the most successful non-proliferation program in history," argues Philip Sewell, senior vice-president at USEC, a private US company that runs the agreement that turns highly enriched uranium into lightly enriched uranium.

After the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the Soviet Union, the administration of George H.W. Bush started negotiating how to get rid of stocks of nuclear arms dismantled in the former Soviet Union.

In 1994, the United States and Russia cut a practical-minded deal to turn 500 metric tonnes of highly enriched uranium, the equivalent of 20,000 nuclear warheads, into weakly enriched uranium that could be used in US nuclear power plants.

The deal so far has made it possible to reprocess 15,000 nuclear warheads stockpiled in the Russian federation, Ukraine and Kazakhstan between 1950-1987.

When it expires in 2013, the program will have handled 20,000 nuclear warheads, and supplied the United States with about 10 percent of its annual power use, or half of its nuclear energy.

edit on 22-5-2011 by timski because: added article



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Darth_Prime
It's quite amusing how the US decides when and where they can deploy troops, even at the opposition of said country

Last of my knowledge the USA was merely a Country and not the 'World'


I've said it before, and I'll say it again, there is no such thing as sovereign territory where US interests and national security are at risk.

Anyone who assumes otherwise would be a fool.

Like it or not, there is no more immediate threat to the USA now than what is and has been happening in Pakistan for a very long time now.

The USA created this problem, and can't seem to find any other way out of it now, they let their charade go on for far to long, and it was and in ways still may be used against them and their precious interests.

Protecting Pakistan's nuclear facilities and weapons now may be a good future security move, but what about the potential that some of this has already made it out of the country?


edit on 22-5-2011 by Fractured.Facade because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:14 PM
link   
Hey - just as Pakistan turns to China for naval base.

The US guarding the nukes and China building a naval base there... in the words of Mike Rowe, "I don't see what could possibly go wrong.."



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:28 PM
link   
If you put American troops on the ground in Pakistan they are going to get attacked plain and simple.
Not because of what they are guarding but purely because they are Americans.
If not by Pakistan elements then by Taliban or Afghanies crossing the border.

This will then be claimed to be attacks for the nuclear weapons and boom.. we have a real problem.



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Agit8dChop
 


I agree totally with you 'Chop.....its a scenario that will spiral out of control....the other issue is this game of bluff they are playing with China.....

Afghanistan doesnt border China directly wheras Pakistan does....any inflamed activity in pakistan requiring the need to base/station large amounts of troops in Pakistan itself will not be tolerated by China I beleive.

Prepare for the draft USA.....



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hindenburg
then watch them turn against the US.
everyone does this, its called blame.


hmmmm
I thought most of them called it
insurgency.

i think Jim Marrs called it the rise of
the Fourth Reich

edit on 5/22/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Fractured.Facade

Originally posted by Darth_Prime
It's quite amusing how the US decides when and where they can deploy troops, even at the opposition of said country

Last of my knowledge the USA was merely a Country and not the 'World'


I've said it before, and I'll say it again, there is no such thing as sovereign territory where US interests and national security are at risk.

Anyone who assumes otherwise would be a fool.

Like it or not, there is no more immediate threat to the USA now than what is and has been happening in Pakistan for a very long time now.

The USA created this problem, and can't seem to find any other way out of it now, they let their charade go on for far to long, and it was and in ways still may be used against them and their precious interests.

Protecting Pakistan's nuclear facilities and weapons now may be a good future security move, but what about the potential that some of this has already made it out of the country?


edit on 22-5-2011 by Fractured.Facade because: (no reason given)


So you don't believe in a 'Take Over' merely the US defending themselves?



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 11:01 PM
link   
Well, this has False Flag written all over It.
I can honestly see US Tank's on the ground In Pakistan within the next 12 month's, Pakistan Is on they'e cards, not to sure what the agenda Is at the moment but no doubt just a stepping stone for something bigger....Iran



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 11:03 PM
link   
reply to post by CanadianDream420
 


This just in


Elite US troops ready to combat Pakistani nuclear hijacks

posted on 16-1-2010
The US army is training a crack unit to seal off and snatch back Pakistani nuclear weapons in the event that militants, possibly from inside the country’s security apparatus, get their hands on a nuclear device or materials that could make one.

The specialised unit would be charged with recovering the nuclear materials and securing them



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 11:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Darth_Prime
 


In this case you really can't effectively do one without doing the other.

So, either go all the way, or do nothing.... Doing nothing here is just as effective as doing it half-assed.

Honestly, I believe its all too little too late.. Unless they can somehow get real intelligence out of any operations there that could provide real insight and leads into actual attack plans.



posted on May, 23 2011 @ 11:16 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


wasn't this predicted here some months ago?

U.S to take over Pakistani Nuclear Plants... more like it IMO.



posted on May, 23 2011 @ 12:13 PM
link   
I still can't believe we got away with the raid on Osama's mansion.

That violated so much International Law it's crazy...I really can't believe more nations weren't up in arms. Am I missing something?

I'm glad he's dead, but it wasn't done legally, as far as I can tell.

That act (and the idea of troops in there without Pakistan's consent), is a direct violation of Pakistan's sovereignty no matter how you slice it.

This policy of begging forgiveness instead of asking for permission is not a good precedent to keep setting.....and eventually it's going to bite us in the arse...
edit on 23-5-2011 by Gazrok because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
13
<<   2 >>

log in

join