posted on May, 22 2011 @ 11:46 PM
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by firepilot
Is it this one - www.holmestead.ca...
already debunked by Uncinus?? contrailscience.com... (so actually a 747 mistaken for a 135)
edit on 22-5-2011 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)
No, but that one is making another chemmie mistake by using a photo of Boeing 747, but mistaking it for a KC-135 and using the wrong wingspan.
Insert the correct wingspan in their little box, and you entirely get an altitude that is feasable for contrailing
Funny, all that work into a website and altitude calcuation, and they cant even use the correct aircraft. Its called "confirmation bias", they want
to see a KC-135, and in their mind they do, but someone who is looking at it without bias, would see a Boeing 747 in their photo
Its like those who so want to see an ivory billed woodpecker, that when they go into the woods, they mistake a variety of different birds for that,
because they so want to see it true.
edit on 22-5-2011 by firepilot because: (no reason given)