It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Explosions and gunfire at Pakistan Airforce base

page: 13
45
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:52 PM
link   
Or is it a U.S. C.I.A. Operation making it look like someone else? Just saying, know how they work.




posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:53 PM
link   
just read a title on Debka

Saudis to US: No More Oil Trade for US Security Shield

seems like Saudi is cutting ties with that American
cushy relationship.

Can't read the article due to no membership
and I ain't gonna pay for it.

And Russia is taking a new stance appears.

edit on 5/22/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by makeitso
BBC Reports The attackers are now holding hostages, including Chinese military personnel, at the Mehran naval aviation base.

I dont think China will be too happy bout that

don't think so either

I bet their subs are getting closer
to the US Coast.

Everybody in the world knows
Al Queda is CIA by now so no
country in the world is gonna believe
the US did not have it's hand in this.



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint
just read a title on Debka

Saudis to US: No More Oil Trade for US Security Shield

seems like Saudi is cutting ties with that American
cushy relationship.

Can't read the article due to no membership
and I ain't gonna pay for it.

And Russia is taking a new stance appears.

edit on 5/22/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)


Mind sharing the new stance Russia is sharing? Just curious.



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 09:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by murphy22
Or is it a U.S. C.I.A. Operation making it look like someone else? Just saying, know how they work.

It's got to be US Forces or CIA doing this.
The Taliban or insurgents do not have
this kind of sophisticated weaponry
and tactics.

edit on 5/22/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ancient Champion
Mind sharing the new stance Russia is sharing? Just curious.


the title reads

"Moscow Takes a Stand on Arab Revolts – Opposite Washington"

I can't read the article, it's a pay site

but the title doesn't sound good



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:02 PM
link   

...The coordinated strike, reportedly involving up to 15 attackers, came just under three weeks after the death of Osama bin Laden in an American raid on in the northwest city of Abbottabad, an event al-Qaida allied extremists here have vowed to avenge...


Source

Perhaps this might be the vowed retaliation attacks.



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by murphy22
Or is it a U.S. C.I.A. Operation making it look like someone else? Just saying, know how they work.

It's got to be US Forces or CIA doing this.
The Taliban or insurgents do not have
this kind of sophisticated weaponry
and tactics.

edit on 5/22/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)


Yeah, Roger that. My thoughts also.



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by murphy22
Or is it a U.S. C.I.A. Operation making it look like someone else? Just saying, know how they work.

It's got to be US Forces or CIA doing this.
The Taliban or Al Queda does not have
this kind of sophisticated weaponry
and tactics.


pakistani taliban claim responability but that could be merely to frame them for local justice.
on a geopolitical level i'd assume this means somewhere along the line they were contacted by x gov't agency to attack the base and hold it, but perhaps they came to them as insurgents themselves.
set up... to set up another setup along the line
ahah damn. all in theory. could be a couple average joe talibans, which is perfect for the gov'ts because no work involved, and a good story to roll with for their credential.



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by InnerPeace2012

...The coordinated strike, reportedly involving up to 15 attackers, came just under three weeks after the death of Osama bin Laden in an American raid on in the northwest city of Abbottabad, an event al-Qaida allied extremists here have vowed to avenge...

Source
Perhaps this might be the vowed retaliation attacks.


tis propaganda my lil brother

OBL's been dead since 2001
why would they want to avenge
a corpse ??? OBL has been used
since 2001 for propaganda and is still
being used in revenge false flags.



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by murphy22
Or is it a U.S. C.I.A. Operation making it look like someone else? Just saying, know how they work.

It's got to be US Forces or CIA doing this.
The Taliban or insurgents do not have
this kind of sophisticated weaponry
and tactics.

edit on 5/22/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)


Exactly what I'm thinking as well. The word "commandos" and sophisticated weaponry" spell that out precisely. This situation seems like its escalating way too fast to become "stable" as Pakistan says it is.
How the # can the C.I.A be that dumb as to think this operation could actually work? Unless they truly planned for a crisis to come out of this mess...?



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:09 PM
link   
reply to post by Conspiracy Now
 


BINGO!



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Conspiracy Now
How the # can the C.I.A be that dumb as to think this operation could actually work? Unless they truly planned for a crisis to come out of this mess...?


That is the key word mate,

as i stated before, this is a well defined tactical mission, not a 'Terrorist' vengeance



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by yourmaker
pakistani taliban claim responability but that could be merely to frame them for local justice.
on a geopolitical level i'd assume this means somewhere along the line they were contacted by x gov't agency to attack the base and hold it, but perhaps they came to them as insurgents themselves.
set up... to set up another setup along the line
ahah damn. all in theory. could be a couple average joe talibans, which is perfect for the gov'ts because no work involved, and a good story to roll with for their credential.


this is NOT Taliban tactics or weaponry.
IMO

Taliban do hit and run attacks,
not hostage negotiations blowing
up planes and laying siege to a
military base.



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:12 PM
link   
It seems whatever group of people are in there are going to be captured, in the end.
No way out?



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by viber8
It seems whatever group of people are in there are going to be captured, in the end.
No way out?


yes, they will have a way out
when US Paratroopers drop in
there and take back the base
and hood the supposed Taliban
and take them out by helicopter.
It's a classic bait and switch operation.
No identities revealed to the Paks
and the invasion of Pakistan begins.

edit on 5/22/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Darth_Prime

Originally posted by Conspiracy Now
How the # can the C.I.A be that dumb as to think this operation could actually work? Unless they truly planned for a crisis to come out of this mess...?


That is the key word mate,

as i stated before, this is a well defined tactical mission, not a 'Terrorist' vengeance


Oh absolutely, no question there at all. The fact that a naval and air base were both attacked, imo in Pakistan's most important city, screams tactical and planned out. My question is how can the American government convince people that they're right in this situation if a large scale war results from this? I mean come on, the general public doesn't even know whats going on in Pakistan, let alone go on to a WW3 event resulting from this nonsense.

edit on 5/22/2011 by Conspiracy Now because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by viber8
It seems whatever group of people are in there are going to be captured, in the end.
No way out?


yes, they will have a way out
when US Paratroopers drop in
there and take back the base
and hood the supposed Taliban
and take them out by helicopter.
It's a classic bait and switch operation.
No identities revealed to the Paks
and the invasion of Pakistan begins.

edit on 5/22/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)


But then China and most likely Russia are added to this equation, and you can't have both of them present in the American invasion of Pakistan w.o starting WW3...Cold War scenario part deux anyone?



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by InnerPeace2012

...The coordinated strike, reportedly involving up to 15 attackers, came just under three weeks after the death of Osama bin Laden in an American raid on in the northwest city of Abbottabad, an event al-Qaida allied extremists here have vowed to avenge...

Source
Perhaps this might be the vowed retaliation attacks.


tis propaganda my lil brother

OBL's been dead since 2001
why would they want to avenge
a corpse ??? OBL has been used
since 2001 for propaganda and is still
being used in revenge false flags.


Whatever you say Big Brother


Yes it is Propaganda as I've been saying all alone...


Not too sure about OBL's story, whether this bogus scam is dead or alive, doesn't matter anymore.

But one things for sure, the motives seems apparent....an attempt to start ww3.

And CIA is at it again.

Peace



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 10:20 PM
link   
my biggest question right now is,
how long will Russia and China
allow this terrorist entity to continue
before tactical operations begin
on their part ???

The ruse has to come to an end
sometime
edit on 5/22/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
45
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join