reply to post by ErosA433
"the universe allows tranmission of information at FTL speeds because the rope constantly should remain in a straight line in the direction of which
the laser was pointed"
You must be talking to an idiot! It is easy to determine that this bozo is an idiot. He makes a sweeping statement and doesn't justify an inch of it.
The rope is straight. What does this have to do with light traveling FTL... whether an atom is near or far? Where is his justification, his argument?
This is just an unsubstantiated statement so far.
"The model is just wrong"
This bean brain should make it a point to take an introductory course in Science once in his life. He will learn that in Science we are never wrong.
It turns out that in Science, we are never right either. It is in religion where they are right and wrong (usually right). Right, wrong, correct,
incorrect, true, false are OPINIONS. In Science we have no opinions. Subjectivity belongs exclusively to religion. In Science, we are only
"explaining how lasers work is impossible."
Well, it would not surprise me that this bean brain can't figure out how a laser works. He doesn't seem to have the gray matter to deal with such
"Why cant there be nothing?"
Not a question of Science! In Science, we only deal with rational questions.
"The universe... is an expansion of a bubble of space time, what exists outside it is unknown"
This is idiocy to the 40th power! Too many errors in just two lines, to wit...
a. The word 'Universe' is not a noun for the purposes of Physics!
b. Concepts don't form into bubbles or expand.
c. The idiot who is giving the presentation HAS to tell the crowd what is outside of and gives shape to HIS proposal. If the stupid idiot who is
giving the prez doesn't understand HIS own theory, then he is # out of luck! In Physics, the first thing that a proponent of a theory has to do is
DRAW HIS objects, the ones HIS theory is based on! Physics is first and foremost the study of objects. Can't do Physics without objects! The only way
to present an object is to illustrate it. There is no object that doesn't have a contrast! The proponent has to label them both.
"It is a mind bending concept that many scientists think about"
Perhaps this issue stumps the monks in the religion of Mathemagics who mislead the public by calling themselves 'scientists'! Perhaps they are
Christian 'scientists'! In Science, this is one of the easiest questions to answer! It's a no-brainer!
"Fields... are everywhere"
... except in Science! Field is where a cow poops! It is the idiots of Mathemagics who have converted concepts (field, mass, energy, time, force,
black hole, charge) into objects. There is no such thing as 'a' field in Science. The word 'field' belongs in religion, specifically, in the religion
of Mathemagics. It has no place in Science, let alone in Physics!
"If something comes along and changes that, at this point in our development, the theory needs to be groundbreaking, more ground breaking than
anything that came before it..."
Whether something comes along that is groundbreaking it will NEVER be accepted. The mathemagicians control the publishing world. No matter what, they
will publish ONLY that which ratifies and confirms GR, QM and ST. We die with the religion of Mathemagical 'fizziks'. It's too late to introduce
groundbreaking theories. There's a mountain of opposition and censorship to derail any new proposal.
"all i see is a bunch of people with toy models pretentiously making out that these toy models are the real thing and that all these huge mountains of
research and information (that is freely available) is all wrong"
The only folks who have unimaginable models are the idiots of Mathemagics! They ONLY have irrational theories. Not one idiot at the LHC can draw a
single particle of the Standard Model. Not one moron from any big name university -- Harvard, Cambridge, Stanford, CalTech, MIT -- can explain to you
how a magnet attracts another one. Not one astronomer in the world can explain to you why the Moon doesn't drift out of the SS. We have two stones:
Earth and Moon. What physical object keeps the Moon faithful to the Earth? After 400 years of Newtonian rubbish the mathemagicians still can't answer
simple questions rationally. Their theories are not 'wrong'. Their theories are irrational!
"it is not because scientists want to cover up the truth"
Truth is the hallmark of religion. If it is truth someone is covering or uncovering, that idiot is a monk or priest in sheep's clothing. In Science,
we don't deal with truth, knowledge, beliefs, opinions or predictions.
edit on 7-2-2013 by ImaFungi because: (no reason given)