posted on May, 22 2011 @ 11:55 AM
reply to post by TedHodgson
Great, you destroy a discussion by getting too emotional. You didn't really read my post. I brought up idea different from yours and what did you do?
Went off topic.
I did not say that we are not animals. I did not say that we do not have instincts, in my post.
I did however send those hypocrites who say that they don't like the civilized world to live in the woods not to sit at PC. I can sit at PC because I
am not stating that I hate civilized world nor I do. So please don't send me to woods.
Also I brought up an argument that humans are the only ones with a capability of rescuing various life forms of Earth if some time in future planet
becomes uninhabitable. Do that by colonizing other planets or creating artificial biospheres on huge mother-ships or whatever.And this was the first
and the most important subject of my post to which you did not respond.
Instead you responded to my last expressed idea in which I stated that you and I are not less responsible for the state our planet is in now and what
the big corps are doing with it. Because we are not making any action against it but instead just having this meaningless discussion on ATS. I do not
deny that I am responsible for the state Earth's is in now by doing nothing to prevent nature's destruction. At the same time there were several
posts including yours that stated that you are not responsible for doing nothing to prevent nature's destruction and that the government and big
corps alone are responsible for killing our planet, animals, nature.
I will put it in allegory: "If you were in a ROOM with YOUR MOTHER and a man who is killing your mother and you do nothing to save her - you'd be as
responsible for her death as her killer is."
YOUR MOTHER = Nature;
KILLER (a man who is killing your mother; remember "YOUR MOTHER" in this allegory is meant to be Nature.) = Big greedy corps, Government.