It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vze2xjjk
reply to post by Simcity4Rushour
Sim,even though I'm 4 years too late for you,you left the other naysayers in the dust because you so nailed the actual reality of the situation about life on Mars.Life visits the landers and rovers long after they become useless to us,because Mars has animals of all sizes like Earth and the very tiny ones like the metalic monsters we send because they maintain heat and become a cozy micro-environment. Those tiny beings are getting radiation in the process. I designed the Mars rovers 1987.There are people on Mars like us who wear clothes and tons of animals wherever a USA craft has landed successfully to record them .Nasa masks the images you paid to see.That's where i come in.
To me, there is a difference between your presentation of what you think is evidence of masking by NASA and proving it.
Originally posted by vze2xjjk
Hi ArMap,I have proved very clearly that Nasa masks the images by pointing at the most famous example this year of an item called a statue,that was blacked out from detail.
I didn't missed it, I even answered to some of your posts, but apparently you were the one that missed them.
Then I presented an example of the same object in a different photo from same vantage point,the 3D images which had been less or not at all tampered with(the answer I found out is "less" tampered with). I showed the 3D image showed clear detail of facial features and body features,and vigorously posted it thru several threads to the point of spamming it.So you couldn't have missed it by now,the comparison shots.
As I said, I did not ignored your presentation, but I think that it doesn't prove anything.
If you choose to ignore my proof then that's your choice. I could present it again ad nauseum,but I'm sure others would complain and rightly so that I was being a PEST.
Well, you are trying to make a case against masking the images, in my view you are not being successful.
No, I'm just making a case against masking the images.It's a censorship issue for me.I gave Nasa good designs that worked consistently and held up better than expected.The payoff is seeing the fruits of my labor and not some troll masking things out for me.That's my personal beef that goes beyond the way you can all experience mere annoyance at some missing info.