Help Analyze a Photograpic Anomaly , page 3

OK, so I think this link should bring you to the zipped folder:

www.4shared.com...

reply to post by OrganicAnagram33

---

Damn, no efix data still.

reply to post by PsykoOps

---

No, I don't have the camera, or the memory card. If you read my post you should know that.

The files were sent to me via e-mail by a person I know, who's mother's friend took the picture. She lives in Ontario and I live in New Brunswick. I am sorry if all the info isn't there.

Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by OrganicAnagram33

---

Damn, no efix data still.

Sure there is, just run it thru Jeffries exif data viewer online

File Comment: LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01
File: 600 × 450 JPEG
40,864 bytes (0.039 megabytes) Image compression: 95%
File — basic information derived from the file.
File Type JPEG
MIME Type image/jpeg
Comment LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01
Encoding Process Baseline DCT, Huffman coding
Bits Per Sample 8
Color Components 3
File Size 40 kB
Image Size 450 × 600
Y Cb Cr Sub Sampling YCbCr4:4:4 (1 1)

reply to post by OrganicAnagram33

---

Several readers have asked the question "Is the second photograph built from the first image"? IMO, ABSOLUTELY NOT!



The left hand image was cropped from the photograph with the white figure and the right hand image was cropped from the reference image (otherwise images are unchanged). Note that the shadows are indistinguishable but the clouds have changed. These are two distinct photographs!

Best regards,
Z

reply to post by OrganicAnagram33

---

Almost all digital cameras store extra information, called metadata, with your pictures. The extra information captured by your camera is called EXIF data, which stands for Exchangeable Image File Format. While most current photo manipulation software supports the reading of this information, there are many specialized tools for reading, editing, extracting and converting EXIF information.

With the original pictures its possible to see if they have been altered in any way.

reply to post by makeitso

---

Sweet! Thanks a bunch! That saves me from bothering that person again.

reply to post by OrganicAnagram33

---

No it doesn't.

It has the bare minimum that it was stripped to.

The original photo will have the camera type, and much more information.

You still need the original to be examined, or there is no way anyone can get that original information.

reply to post by makeitso

---

Womp womp haha. Alright, I'll bother her again I guess.

Here is an example of what you should see in exif data from a Sony Camera with Jefferies exif data.

This particular one is from an image taken at Fukushima Japan Nuclear Reactor.

Don't forget to scroll all the way down.

reply to post by makeitso

---

*Impressed whistling sound* That's a lot of data!

I sent her an e-mail asking her to upload a folder of the originals onto a sharing site. You have to understand that I first asked her to send the photos, then asked her to give me the background story, and now I'm asking her to do this as well, so hopefully it's not too much of a bother for her and she can do it. In any case, I'll update you guys as soon as I hear back.

reply to post by makeitso

---

Hmmm, it seems that exif viewer is better than the one I use. Thanks.

That is a very old house .. I have one to show you that I used to pass by and it's known to be watched around halloween time for strange sightings in side the house and neighbors have seen at other times..

There is anouther house that's closer by an i'm saying these houses have to be over 100 years old .. the one you have looks like its altered .. IMO but im not an expert it's just a bit to all white .. or it could be when it was enlarged it just turned out that bright .. still tho as it looks to me now id say no anomaly



files.abovetopsecret.com...

error level analysis with no anomaly:
errorlevelanalysis.com...

error level analysis with anomaly:
errorlevelanalysis.com...

If you read what that website has to say about error level analysis, and maybe do a little extra research on your own, you will better be able to understand the results. Because according to this error level analysis, the image does not show obvious signs of manipulation. The color and pattern of the compression artifacts are pretty much the same.

here is an edited image with error level analysis:
errorlevelanalysis.com...

See how it's super bright for different parts of the image which were obviously edited in? That means it's definitely edited. Neither of the two images the OP posted show this inconsistency [edit: to my eyes].

reply to post by sickofitall2012

---

EXCELLENT; WELL SAID!!

How terrible that on ATS, of all places, a new thread is greeted with accusations of fraud without ANY scientific analysis of the data they presented. "Its manipulated because I think so", is hardly an impartial and scientific analysis of the data. Just because we don't understand something does not mean it must be fraudulent. And what possible motivation could this individual have for perpetrating a hoax? None! FYI: very few, if any, hoaxers provide reference photographs.

Instead of bashing posters who stick their necks out to share with us genuinely controversial data, we should sincerely thank them for opening our minds to possibilities we would otherwise never consider.

Best regards,
Z

Paranormal photos: separate the wheat from the chaff.
  Posted 10 days ago with 68 member flags

I-Team: Strange Circumstances Surround Park Disappearances (vid on link)
  Posted 15 days ago with 30 member flags

Shared Dreaming Experiment
  Posted 14 days ago with 10 member flags

To those who can have OBEs
  Posted 7 days ago with 9 member flags

My Ghost Radar Predicts a Mega-Quake on June 15, 2012 at Noon!
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags

Bompa
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags

I would like to share an experience.. Telepathy , Communicating through the inner soul and uses of t
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags

An Ancient Ghost Story by Pliny the Younger
  Posted 13 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: