It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
BH, why the heck is marriage federal law?
It's a religious ceremony.
Hows about we make civil unions the official legally substitute to marriage, in that way we keep religious ceremonies out of government, the religious nuts can keep marriage the way they want to themselves, and civil unions are not bounded by gender.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I disagree. I am VERY much married and my husband and I are atheists. We never set foot in a church and no religious words were spoken.
Each person defines their own marriage.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by AngryOne
"Evolution of acceptance", you say? Ugh, I shudder to think of what they'll be telling us to "accept" next.....
I doubt anyone is concerned with what you personally accept. I am not. I don't care if people accept gay marriage or not. All I care about is equal treatment under the law for all citizens. And the acceptance that is naturally happening in the US is a sign that equal treatment will eventually be a reality.
With or without your acceptance.
Homosexuals can adopt, have surrogate mothers, and get artifically inseminated. Your argument is irrelevant.
Originally posted by Fromabove
Homosexuals can't have children, nor ever "be" a family.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
BH, why the heck is marriage federal law? It's a religious ceremony. Hows about we make civil unions the official legally substitute to marriage, in that way we keep religious ceremonies out of government, the religious nuts can keep marriage the way they want to themselves, and civil unions are not bounded by gender.
Simple solution!
Originally posted by AngryOne
And this isn't about general acceptance, you say? That's obviously not true. Many people such as myself are indeed critical of faggotry and from what I can gather, that drives people like you absolutely nuts.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
This is a great article and has lots of side links to explore.
TIME NewsFeed
For the first time, a majority of Americans claim that same-sex marriages should be recognized by law. But despite these gains, the issue remains more divisive than ever before.
A new Gallup poll released on Friday reveals that 53% of Americans believe that gay marriage should be legalized, and that couples who enter into these unions should be provided with the same rights as traditional marriages — a 9% increase from 2010, when only 44% of respondents said that gay marriage should be legal.
Read more: newsfeed.time.com...
Link to Poll
This is great news. The majority of people in the US support not just civil unions, or some sort of 'separate but equal' status, but full-on marriage for gay people.
I think this is a sign of things to come. Now that the Defense of Marriage Act is no longer being defended and Don't Ask Don't Tell is out of the way, we can make strides toward true equality in marriage.
Seems older people and Republicans are the holdouts. One of those is self-correcting and eventually, I hope Republicans will see that their discrimination is unconstitutional. They should be made aware that they cannot preach "smaller government" and then increase government's intrusion into our lives.
So, Republicans, listen up!
Originally posted by Misoir
One; We are not a democratic state, we are a republic, thus such public opinion is technically irrelevant in the realm of law.
Two; Since it is not a super-majority (60%+) that means if we were to pass a gay marriage bill nearly half of Americans would be upset, how could that be productive?
The smart thing for Republicans to do is not necessarily endorse gay marriage or civil unions but to become a neutral block on the issue, at least the establishment of the party.
Now 60 years later the GOP is fighting against expanding civil rights to a minority group.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Yes, but that's your view and acceptance of marriage. To the religious establishment in this country, marriage is theirs.
You don't view marriage as solely a religious ceremony, unfortunately many politicians and others view it as such and this is the motivation to why they refuse to accept it any where beyond that of a man and a woman.
Originally posted by AngryOne
Your choice of words are rather interesting - you say "naturally" as if this was destined to happen; as if people like me are backward, degenerate freaks.
Many people such as myself are indeed critical of ******** and from what I can gather, that drives people like you absolutely nuts.