Theory of Subatomic Consciousness

reply to post by Kashai


whats the definition of random? and whats an example of something occurring randomly?
in what way do quarks behave non randomly?

I just wanted to add a few things and put this into a historical perspective briefly. Then I want to put this into a contemporary perspective and explain a few things as to why this is being suppressed.

What we call source consciousness is this theory under another title. What we used to call this in antiquity was THE WORD. Ever heard that before?

The concept of a thought making reality is not new, and really it is the source of everything we have come to call magic and what we have skewed either purposely or not into a concept of God.

The reason why science and their religious counterparts are so scared of this is because it validates both and effectively proves that God exists, but not as the religious have taught each other, and not as science has tried to debunk it.

The fact that every sentient thing IS god, and that each has a power to transform reality is too big for mankind in their opinion. That is just dumb. If we realized this we would be ready and really only this concept can free us from the cycles of diminishing return in which we are caught. We are to avoid the need to reset once we reach a state that requires that we accept this but do not, starting the cycle again.

This is the circular or reciprocal nature tribal cultures around the world have described in countless ways when describing the world, the universe and life as well as creation.

We are in a loop of reality that a strong force of consciousness created. The other reason why this secret is protected is because some have realized that if they can control consciousness they can create reality to their benefit, they don't fully understand the concept but like what it can offer....them. Again the whole thing really escapes them.

so these forces of ignorance that push their jealous minds on us want for all of us to think a certain way they can govern so as to achieve power. The power to them being the reward and not the infinite consciousness that is part of every living thing.

Science feels that it should not entertain the thought of god, favoring instead other blind faiths as you described as materialism. Religion cant entertain the thought of self god and self god understanding because well, they would be out of business rather quickly.

I guarantee you that the majority of Vatican vault secrets cover attempts to offer this information in one way or the other. It is not so much about competition as it is sacrilege to them for people to have gods mind somewhere in there with their own. Again, the whole thing escapes them.

We are not part of god like his children, we are like him like a drop is to an ocean, or a cell is to the whole.

The force of love is not just good. It is the cohesion that binds our many parts into a whole. like we can see in our matrix living things are sometimes hosts to counter life forms that feed of the host. That is where the counter force of cohesion comes into play and why we can see it translated into a dividing force even in our world perspective.

The truth is that when we learn this concept like our ancients did we can break the cycle and cure the host which we make up.

The source consciousness is ever present and becoming self aware again. Like all things it grows and when we are all aligned again in it we will have enough force to oppose the counter consciousness that feeds off the host. we will finally be immune to its parasitic process.

Bioelectric energy wave manipulation from the brain is like sound vibration by vocal chords leading to speaking, is the language of source and has everything to do with harmonic resonance with the universe. It is the echo of this consciousness we can pick up on and tune our selves to. Source is once more in humanities reach and there is nothing that can be done to stop it.

Like a parasite that knows it will be cut from its host. It would kill rather than die in hopes that the fear and pain cause the host to stop. This will not work since source knows no pain and we will teach it to be immune to the parasitic process as we have learned.

we are like the good Borg. This parasitic consciousness will be assimilated and its force and ethereal distinctiveness will be incorporated into our own....lol.

we are as one!

I just had to add that since yesterday I was too busy resonating with the universe and having a great time with my family. Life is simple and great!

This is a great thread and a must read for all people. It deserved a more thought out response.

Consciousness does not create reality. This was a popular way of interpreting the problem of wave collapse in quantum mechanics during the 1970s and 1980s, but it has now gone out of fashion amongst physicists. Rather, consciousness IS reality, different realities corresponding to different modes of consciousness. There are seven such modes. We do not see reality in the way it is. We see it in the way we are.

Subatomic particles do not possess consciousness. This is a pansychical view that is based upon the false, Cartesian duality of matter and mind/spirit. Instead, subatomic particles ARE the most basic forms of consciousness (Leibnitz's Monad). This may be anaethema to materialistic science, which has not got a clue what consciousness is, but, eventually, it will become part of the scientific paradigm.

Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by Kashai

 

whats the definition of random? and whats an example of something occurring randomly?
in what way do quarks behave non randomly?

Random events have no particular order and the opposite is true for non-random events. Actually common virtual particles do blink in and out of reality, as we understand it, in a random way. Virtual quarks also blink in and out of reality but this activity supports the structure and stability of the atom. So that the effect of a virtual quarks returning to the atom, affects all the other quarks, that are not virtual in such a way, the atom remains solid.

Without these events the atom would disintegrate.

See attached link...

www.simurgh.net...

Any thoughts?

reply to post by Kashai


"Random events have no particular order and the opposite is true for non-random events. Actually common virtual particles do blink in and out of reality, as we understand it, in a random way. "

I guess I was thinking how can anything be random if everything that occurs has a cause ( a reason it occurred),,
and how can anything be unordered or organized when all things are governed by strict laws...

ok so,,,,, common virtual particles blink in and out of reality,,,, even if they did have a cause and reason for doing so ( like the virtual quarks which support an atom) they would still be deemed random? or its because they have no viewable cause or reason, that they are said to be occurring randomly?

where are these common virtual particles viewed to be blinking in and out of reality?

Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by Kashai

 

"Random events have no particular order and the opposite is true for non-random events. Actually common virtual particles do blink in and out of reality, as we understand it, in a random way. "

I guess I was thinking how can anything be random if everything that occurs has a cause ( a reason it occurred),,
and how can anything be unordered or organized when all things are governed by strict laws...

ok so,,,,, common virtual particles blink in and out of reality,,,, even if they did have a cause and reason for doing so ( like the virtual quarks which support an atom) they would still be deemed random? or its because they have no viewable cause or reason, that they are said to be occurring randomly?

where are these common virtual particles viewed to be blinking in and out of reality?

Everywhere, as far as everywhere constitutes in space/time in relation to reality reality as we currently understand it. Take for example a cubic millimeter of space/time that is a part of the La Grange point
between the Earth and Moon....

Enormous amounts of virtual particles their, are blinking in and out of reality as we understand it, the same applies to the space inside the atoms, inside our bodies. This is a basis for conclusions related to 0-point energy and is currently favored as a cause for the Universe currently expanding, as offered a reuslt of astronomical observation.

Cause and effect in relation to random events can be surmised in the context of probability. Take for the example the conclusions related to how this Universe would end. The Big Crunch vs the Big Freeze, either can result in a new universe, as in the case of the big freeze, the result of black hole decay. Either way a new universe can be created but what are the odds (barring intervention), that the next universe will be exactly like this one?

The odds suggest that the answer will be know but if one considers say a quintillion such cycles what then are the odds? What about a quintillion to the power of a quintillion such cycles? The odds therefore decrease, in relation to the possibility we will be having this conversation again.

I feel it is important to remember that in respect to causality. Relationships in so far as far as we understand, imply an orientation beyond our current scope of things in general. The question of the Human condition also relates despite ideology to factors beyond common contemplation.

Or beyond potential relationships that could exist within the context of much larger scales in respect to probability. Implied is that Random events are not random at all, upon scales beyond our current perception.


Any thoughts?

Good posts and I like the theory.

I agree, the formless gives birth to the physical. Everything on earth, everything in the universe and the universe itself can be traced back to formless probability.

reply to post by neoholographic


What is the 'formless', exactly?