It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Are nukes going to be the new 9/11?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 20 2011 @ 09:10 AM
link   
9/11... I have to say is probably the greatest hoax mankind has ever seen. It did phenomenal. A reported nearly ~3k killed. It was surprising to see how the whole world shifted its consciousness so much for that small amount of people. While so many are starving, etc.

What I think is that they want to up things up a bit. So much fear mongering.

Even Alex Jones says they want nukes next in the U.S.A... I mean. I think in all fairness we should have a Pin that reads "TPTB WANT TO NUKE THE U.S.A.". Because its obvious what they want now. And create a military police state -whatever.

First I get data and calculations and subliminal messaging (local, no no no , not everybody can see the subliminal messaging) Of them wanting to nuke places like Western New York (Buffalo area). Now people are getting off their keester saying they want to nuke Chicago?

They want to do something....




posted on May, 20 2011 @ 09:16 AM
link   
reply to post by PaR3v
 


Any evidence? because if not, i have a feeling you may be eaten alive on here



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 09:25 AM
link   
reply to post by PaR3v
 


Yes it would be interesting to see some reports on this, but would it be a small tactical strike by a militant individual or small group.
or a larger strike from a country firing missiles into the USA...
makes you wonder if it did play out, which one would happen.



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 09:26 AM
link   
reply to post by PaR3v
 


Look up NLE 2010.

Missed opportunity. or this statement:


TPTB WANT TO NUKE THE U.S.A.


Is a load of bull.



edit on 20/5/11 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 09:35 AM
link   
reply to post by PaR3v
 


Yeah you may want to look up some sources for your banter rather quickly and cite them because I am biding my time before I take a bite out of the ridiculousness that these assumptions are.
edit on 20-5-2011 by DragonRain311 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join