It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dilligaf28
reply to post by jibeho
I didn't say anything about it being a cash for clunkers trade in program. I simply stated that you say it is a scam to make people pay their taxes so they can get the rebate but the source you quoted says the government wants to change it so the people get the rebate at the dealership.
I am attempting to comment on that and that alone. I am curious how it can be a scam to make you file your taxes if they give you the rebate off of the price of the car at the dealership (which means you would get it without filing your taxes)?
I'm not sure what relevancy the fraud regarding electric vehicle tax credits has with this discussion. In fact the fraud only further reinforces that changing the rebate from being received on your taxes to being received on the invoice at the time of purchase would be beneficial.
As for who actually gets the money if the rebate is applied to the dealership I would think the answer would be obvious. If I go to buy a car that stickers for $35,000 and I only pay $27,500 because there is a credit on the statement for the tax rebate then yes I did indeed receive $7,500 realized through the savings on the final invoice.
And as for the dealerships being able to record the vehicle selling at full price thanks to the rebate change I ask you to consider this: If I pay full price for the vehicle and receive the rebate on my taxes or if the government chips in the $7500 at the time of purchase makes no difference as to what the car sold for. Either way the automaker receives X amount for the purchase of the vehicle.
edit on 20-5-2011 by Dilligaf28 because: change grammer erroredit on 20-5-2011 by Dilligaf28 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
Hey get your story straight!! This is no way a cash for clunkers program that you stated incorrectly. THis is just another tax credit scam that can only be claimed when you file taxes....
Originally posted by Dilligaf28
reply to post by jibeho
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
Hey get your story straight!! This is no way a cash for clunkers program that you stated incorrectly. THis is just another tax credit scam that can only be claimed when you file taxes....
That statement seems to me to indicate that you feel this is a tax credit scam that can only be claimed when you file your taxes; in other words you have to pay taxes to get the money.
I am curious whether or not you plan to address my rebuttal of your statement that the automakers are using this as a way to record full sales prices for vehicles. After you have addressed my rebuttal I will be happy to address your question regarding the money staying in the system.
Originally posted by GunzCoty
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
For that much money i would rather buy a viper.
I mean $40,500?
There are way 2 many things wrong with electric cars and the system (or lack there of) they have and then you put a tag of $40,500 on it?
Yeah no ill stick to gas as long as i can thank you.
Originally posted by abecedarian
I remember back in the early/mid 90's when CARB (California Air Resources Board- where the EPA takes cues from) was pushing electric vehicles and such (GM EV-1 anyone?) and Ed Begley Jr. bought one 'cause it would save the world, and it was potentially a multi-billion dollar subsidy. People did some research (doesn't take much research, just logical thought) and found that they could buy PZEV Cadillacs (at $40,000 each) to replace "gross polluter" vehicles, and that would clean up the air better than they could do by subsidizing EV's, and would be cheaper.