It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by anumohi
Now I'm afraid you are an enemy agent...oh my god, we're all enemy agents..maybe the president can help us out of our dilemma and prove that he is not , so we may follow in his honest forthcoming footsteps and be allies
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Everyone that talks about how open their documentation is or brags about who they are, I have been asking them to back it up. I am not sure why no one has yet but you seem more honest than most so I feel good about this one.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Well at least party because it is against the T&C of this site to post personally identifiable information for members.
A public figure like the President is different. And the issue is not with any ATS member. The issue is with the President.
And it shouldn't take me posting anything about me to convince YOU that something, many things, about Obama's history are very questionable, sketchy and point to conspiracy to defraud the public.
I would put the anomalies on par with 9/11- there are just so many things wrong with this picture that a new painting needs to be commissioned.
Originally posted by banandar123
Originally posted by wcitizen
Please provide some tangible evidence to support your claim that its not factual.
The burden of proof is usually placed on the original claimant, just FYI.
No, it’s not. I see nothing in the Terms & Conditions that prohibits members from posting their personal information from their own free will.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Well at least party because it is against the T&C of this site to post personally identifiable information for members.
15). Posting: You will not Post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate. You will not solicit personal information from any member. You will not use information gathered from this website to harass, abuse or harm other people.
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Can you show me the T&C you are specifically referring to?
ii) You will not Post, use the chat feature, use videos, or use the private message system to collect or ask for the personal information (data mining) about forum members, including email addresses and "real life" names, in any manner whatsoever, or for any reason whatsoever.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Yep.
ii) You will not Post, use the chat feature, use videos, or use the private message system to collect or ask for the personal information (data mining) about forum members, including email addresses and "real life" names, in any manner whatsoever, or for any reason whatsoever.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
And any reason whatsoever includes to prove Obama's BC is a fraud. So by asking someone to divulge their real names is asking someone to violate the T&C. Something you SHOULD care about, if you want to post here. But you said you could care less.
And I don't know WHAT you are talking about with anyone claiming to be someone. That is just whack. And off topic. Address the interview, dude. Kinda have to listen to it first though- if you want to say anything relative to the topic.edit on Tue May 24th 2011 by TrueAmerican because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by banandar123
reply to post by wcitizen
The official story is fact by default. Disputing arguments are the ones that must be proven by facts. I know it's sad, but it's only logical.
Originally posted by wcitizen
'The official story is fact by default.? Where did you find that nonsense?
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
People, don't listen to these bozos trying to derail the thread. The interview is about 39 minutes, and is extremely interesting. Promise.
Originally posted by banandar123
Originally posted by wcitizen
'The official story is fact by default.? Where did you find that nonsense?
Because its the story believed by the vast majority....? = the majority opinion...= essentially fact until proven otherwise.
STANDING The legal right to initiate a lawsuit. To do so, a person must be sufficiently affected by the matter at hand, and there must be a case or controversy that can be resolved by legal action.There are three requirements for Article III standing: (1) injury in fact, which means an invasion of a legally protected interest that is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical; (2) a causal relationship between the injury and the challenged conduct, which means that the injury fairly can be traced to the challenged action of the defendant, and has not resulted from the independent action of some third party not before the court; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision, which means that the prospect of obtaining relief from the injury as a result of a favorable ruling is not too speculative. Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 112 S. Ct. 2130, 2136 (1992) (Lujan). The party invoking federal jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing each of these elements. Id.
Originally posted by starshift
The divide and distract tactic is working like a charm. The Kenyan is not important. He's the entertainment while the country is being looted.