Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
They gave up their licenses, because he was a senator and was running for president. She was working for the University of Chicago and University of
Chicago Hospital. Neither were practicing law. Why would they continue to pay their dues to keep the licenses? Waste of money.
That argument is so fail there aren't words capable of penetrating your mind to fix it. Suffice to say professionals don't just "give up"
licenses out of convenience. Money hasn't been an object to the Obamas for some time, and they have people to take care of pesky tasks like
Originally posted by i am just saying
It is no use, the koolaid drinkers are too far gone. They will never see their champion for what he really is...a fraud. They are the reason he keeps
I am pretty sure O-bots would find a way to dismiss a live feed press conference in which the President admits to all counts. They refuse to
acknowledge any sliver of evidence, no matter how rational or logical or forensic. It's all lies and fabrications, perpetrated by a vast right-wing
conspiracy which they immediately
slander and marginalize. All evidence presented is immediately wrestled to the ground using grossly
ficticious ad hominem attacks...almost seems like there's a playbook, doesn't it?
Originally posted by miniatus
All I ask is for some hard evidence.. documentation.. proof.. verifiable evidence...
What exactly is the hard proof that would satisfy you? You heard his grandmother say he was born in Kenya. You know that his history rides a very
fine line between citizen or not. You have been shown discrepancies in the sequential BC numbers. You have been shown that the PDF released has
clearly been tampered with (this fact cannot be disputed, innocent or otherwise the PDF had work done to it.)...shown by many different individuals
who (if you watch the video walkthroughs) know their way around OCR, graphics programs and creation. You have also been shown that the preprinted
text on the short-form BC doesn't match the text that should be on that version.
Add to all this the original confusion of where he was born, the major lack of data that normally follows all
Americans around throughout their
lives. Now we have skip trace records surfacing that provide supporting evidence to even more theories regarding alias use...
Any one of the issues might be an anomaly that could be rationally dismissed. But the whole of the evidence can't and shouldn't
rationally dismissed. So many "identity coincidences" just don't happen to one man. You or I would be convicted on this evidence in a New York
I consider myself a "second wave" birther. I really didn't care about it before (and for the record, never cared about the Presidents ethnicity).
In fact I am left of center, politically. Prior to the LFBC it just felt like two groups shouting "IS NOT!" / "IS!" back and forth.
But since the long form was released, the mystery surrounding the evidence caught my attention. And to be completely honest, I think the issue is a
waste of time anyhow. TPTB wanted him in office, and I would be very surprised if TPTB allowed a true "smoking gun" to surface, let alone remove
this guy. What fascinates me at this point is how supposedly educated intellectual supporters will not concede the tiniest amount of ground, even in
the face of the very best of the evidence. It can only be 100% racist-driven, bald-faced lying and forgery. No one
who comes forward with
evidence is in any way credible (except Barack's grandmother, she's just a sweet old woman who is getting on in years
So what would it take evidence-wise to get an Obama supporter to simply concede that SOMETHING isn't adding up here?