posted on Aug, 3 2004 @ 06:35 AM
Should the United States consider a preemptive attack on Mexico?
It qualifies under the new International Rules for waging war and occupying other countries
It has OIL.
Congress would not be a problem
. We can claim that the attack is a continuation of the search for weapons of mass destruction, hunt for Osama,
seeking the tooth fairy or any other Harvard ideal that we choose.
Solves the problem of invited illegal aliens as they would all become citizens of the United States
It is close by, logistics for the pentagon would be much easier, and soldiers could have the weekends off. Cost savings will help shrink the
Privatization (stealing) of the countrys natural resources and public works will boost the earnings of the selected companies
.i.e. boost the
stock market, good for 401Ks, create jobs, broaden government, remove any question of borders, give Israel a precedent for its adventures in the
There are probably hundreds of other righteous reasons to conduct such a preemptive attack on Mexico.
The problem I have is whether or not, under the New Constitution of the United States" (no one has seen the new version yet), we need Israels
permission for such action?
WE, THE JEWISH PEOPLE, CONTROL AMERICA, AND THE AMERICANS KNOW IT. Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon October 3, 2001 (IAP NEWS)
Can anyone explain to me how things work now? I really need the information before I start with Canada.
[edit on 3-8-2004 by John bull 1]