reply to post by syrinx high priest
What military would send 'mutated children' as pilots for an extraordinarily dangerous and sensitive mission?
Generally, in the USSR, like in the USA, the pilots would be top-level hard-core straight-arrow heroic Captain Russia types. The sort of people who
are smart, well trained, and damn good pilots. The ones military officers trust.
For example, was Gary Powers a shrunken transsexual?
In 1947, officers of the USSR would not exactly think highly of some Nazi prisoner's repulsively bizzare ideas. You'd probably have to stop them from
torturing such a Dr. Mengele-type for suggesting them.[
If it really was a soviet aircraft the U.S. government would certainly have held it over the U.S.S.R.'s head in diplomatic channels.
Actually, I doubt it---if the USSR in 1947 had been able to penetrate deep in US airspace so easily then nobody in the US would have dared to admit
it.
And if the USSR had such technology in 1947 then why did they end up producing
4.bp.blogspot.com...
and not something radically different?
I really doubt it was ET but I don't believe this story either---unless, in truth, what crashed was not really anything like a magic 'flying saucer'
and there weren't any child-sized pilots.
I just don't think that sounds very plausible, in the sense that we were building a nuclear arsenal by 1947. How likely is it that the Soviet
leaders would have seen this as a prudent provocation barely two years after the US had annihilated two cities in a nearby country with rather modest
nuclear bombs?
A thought occurred to me. Maybe it wasn't an intentional Soviet provocation at all, but a botched reconaissance mission. They were spying on the US
nuclear & bomber complex, which was pretty heavily concentrated in New Mexico in 1947. They were desperately scared. They had the information on the
A-bomb from Klaus' Fuchs espionage in Los Alamos, so they knew it was real, but they didn't know how fast it was being industrialized and deployed.
Given historical circumstances, and actual human logic, this makes the most sense to me. And any US cover-up is also logical.
edit on 23-5-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)
edit on 23-5-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason
given)
edit on 23-5-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)
edit on 23-5-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason
given)