Disclaimer: This is not necessarily a new topic, but hopefully, we can bring it full circle by now. It is a huge topic and I will do my best
to condense and make sense of it. Further, I see there was a recent post on the 60-Minutes video and several last year, so I have included them
within this post.
Intro
Yesterday, while watching one of the last seemingly constitutional advocates, Judge Napolitano on his FOX show, the Judge had fellow Fox Business
newscaster, Eric Bolling on at the end. Right before his close, Eric Bolling mentioned the extreme danger of the growing Sovereign Citizen movement
in the U.S. For many of you who are not aware, here is how Wikipedia defines the movement:
Sovereign Citizen Movement (Wikipedia):
The sovereign citizen movement is a loose network of American litigants, commentators and financial scheme promoters. Self-described "sovereign
citizens" believe that they are answerable only to English common law and are not subject to any statutes or proceedings at the federal, state or
municipal levels. They especially reject most forms of taxation as illegitimate. Participants in the movement argue this concept in opposition to
"federal citizens," who, they believe, have unknowingly forfeited their rights by accepting some aspect of federal law.
While I noticed Eric Bolling's comment, I just tucked it away. Then, today I read this
blog, which brought me to this CBS
article.
For the full length 60-Minutes video, visit post by ATS'er, rstregooski.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
U.C.C. Law
Though not apparent at first, the original pinnings of this movement have to do with contract law and its association with Universal Commercial Code
(U.C.C.) Law. U.C.C. law is essentially comprises all laws that are presented to us today, versus Common Laws. For a quick explanation on this,
Jordan Maxwell sheds some light on this:
Jordan Maxwell
Note: this is a very popular video on YouTube and it may have been presented here on ATS before. Nonetheless, I am attempting to show you how
it is traveling full circle. Further, I am not attempting to go into the whole Birth Certificate, IRS debate here, per se.
So, why is this noteworthy and pertinent?
1. Several researches have long argued that the "god" of the Old Testament is different from the "god" of the new testament. The god of the
Old Testament orginated out of ancient Sumer & Babylon and was later adopted by Judaism. Essentially, the individual is a servant to the Old
Testament "god" through contracts (thus the origination of contract law), and therefore "controlled."
2. 1215 A.D.: Magna Carta. With this document, it states that individual rights come from God and not the state or government. Eventually,
this evolved into Common Law.
3. In approximately 1933, the U.S. incorporated and claimed all of its citizens as corporations and therefore, when you entered into this
world, you "contracted" with the U.S. Inc., foregoing many of your sovereign rights. This was an assualt by (Zionist Bankers) on the American
population to subvert the common laws.
4. Today, with the reach of the U.S. government becoming more and more invasive in removing your rights, people are filing the U.C.C.-1
paperwork to free themselves of this "contract" relationship - thus enters the Sovereign Citizen.
5. In an attempt to smear this movement or bring light to the details of what these people stand for, they are being labeled as tax evading,
domestic terrorists.
How Is the Sovereign Citizen Movement Presented Today?
Internet News Search (Google)
A quick search on Google news shows you the growing and negative presentation of this movement in the U.S., with all news corporations presenting this
group in ill light. Surely, they are missing the point of the whole reason, which is the "contract" aspect of the government to its "citizen."
Even Russia Today Sort of presents it in bad light, choosing a "pot head" to speak on the subject:
Russia Today Video
Sovereign Citizen: Out of Gov'ts Reach
The (Zionist) Anti-Deformation League's, which has a huge investment in maintaining the status quo of contrac law and the Zionist Bankers, present the
SC's and all groups aware of this invalid "contract" law as extremists - as you can read on their
site.
However, before you scoff at the legality of this or believe what they have you believe about it's legality, then explain to me this:
Ray St. Clair (Part 1)
Part 2:
www.youtube.com...
Now, that video was in England, however, you will find a judge bowing to a defended on YT, here in the U.S. Both countries - in fact all sovereign
nations - follow the common laws, unless the individual forgoes the law for the corporate law.
Summary
So, if we only look at the impact of U.C.C. information and the resultant sovereign citizen bit, many of you may say, "so what?" However, What is
really interesting here is that the roots of this "contract" law go back to ancient Sumer and Babylon, picked up by the Jews (or more accurately, the
Zionist faction) and are being used against us to dismantle the constitution - legally, by "contract" with it's (ignorant) citizens. Our government
is even using the
FBI to target these individuals (courtesy ATS'er,
mothershipzeta).
Currently, the "contract" aspect, which many U.S. Citizens are completely unaware of or laugh off, have no idea that this is the method by which our
U.S. government is removing our rights today. As several citizens are awakening to this fact and removing themselves of this reality, the government
is fighting back by employing the press - left and right - to cast this movement in a terroristic light. If everyone in the U.S. woke up and did
this, the government would not have funding - or more aptly put, the Federal Reserve and it's shareholders would no longer have power.
So, I am not trying to convince anyone here one way or another that they should be a SC or file U.C.C paperwork, but as this case emerges in main
stream, understand the reason behind it - which is not domestic terrorism, but the result of U.S. citizens tired of big brother, banker ruled
government, and legally opting out of the "contract."
Further, I have nothing against Judaism or its believers, but I think the Zionism movement (which is not Judaism) is suspect, especially with respect
to contract law and government infiltration.
Sources:
1. SGT Report:
sgtreport.com...
2. The Anti-Dformation Leage:
www.adl.org...
3. CBS Website:
www.cbsnews.com...
4. Russia Today: YouTube Channel
5. Ray St. Clair on U.C.C. - YouTube
6. Jordan Maxwell - YouTube Video
edit on 18-5-2011 by alyoshablue because: typos
