It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
To achieve this, they have been studying complex catalysts designed to mimic the catalysts plants use to split water with sunlight. But the new study shows that there might be much simpler alternatives. "Birnessite, it turns out, is what does the work. Like other elements in the middle of the Periodic Table, manganese can exist in a number of what chemists call oxidation states. These correspond to the number of oxygen atoms with which a metal atom could be combined," Professor Spiccia said. Co-author on the research paper was Dr Rosalie Hocking, Research Fellow in the Australian Centre for Electromaterials Science who explained that what was interesting was the operation of the catalyst, which follows closely natures biogeochemical cycling of manganese in the oceans. "This may provide important insights into the evolution of Nature’s water splitting catalyst found in all plants which uses manganese centres,” Dr Hocking said.
sorry for my lack of knowledge, but what exactly does spliting water mean ?
Originally posted by realitytango
sorry for my lack of knowledge, but what exactly does spliting water mean ?
to create a cheap, efficient way to split water, powered by sunlight,
Sunlight is the total spectrum of the electromagnetic radiation given off by the Sun.
Originally posted by miniatus
Hydrogen itself isn't fuel, it's an energy carrier.. so separating it from oxygen is only part of the process.. still this is a great step
Originally posted by chuckk
Originally posted by miniatus
Hydrogen itself isn't fuel, it's an energy carrier.. so separating it from oxygen is only part of the process.. still this is a great step
Hydrogen is a great fuel, just add flame to burn and release it's energy.
Originally posted by reddpill
reply to post by iforget
Scientists can look all they like but when their head is buried in the 'dirt' they will never see the technology that is always around them.
The little secret regarding this technology is very simple. It's 'pulse'. Humans use directed and constant force in a straight line to achieve things in science today. Nature on the other hand uses a pulse and a natural spiral movement of electrons. The space shuttle launch is a good example where it uses 'force' in a straight line and is the most expensive method of spending energy and movement . The shuttle wants to 'spiral' if left to it's own natural movement but the guidance computers will not allow for that.
All one needs to do is to pulsate the water with resonance at a certain frequency. Nothing more, nothing less.
edit on 18-5-2011 by reddpill because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by realitytango
sorry for my lack of knowledge, but what exactly does spliting water mean ?
Breaking the chemical bond between the hydrogen and oxygen atoms to free the hydrogen for use as a fuel.
Plants do it through the process of photosynthesis and use the hydrogen with carbon to form sugars.
edit on 18-5-2011 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by drakus
Originally posted by reddpill
reply to post by iforget
Scientists can look all they like but when their head is buried in the 'dirt' they will never see the technology that is always around them.
The little secret regarding this technology is very simple. It's 'pulse'. Humans use directed and constant force in a straight line to achieve things in science today. Nature on the other hand uses a pulse and a natural spiral movement of electrons. The space shuttle launch is a good example where it uses 'force' in a straight line and is the most expensive method of spending energy and movement . The shuttle wants to 'spiral' if left to it's own natural movement but the guidance computers will not allow for that.
All one needs to do is to pulsate the water with resonance at a certain frequency. Nothing more, nothing less.
edit on 18-5-2011 by reddpill because: (no reason given)
Hmm, I like the way you think.
I'd have to get into that to emit a valid opinion, though.