It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Smear campaign on Pakistan

page: 1
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 18 2011 @ 02:59 AM
link   
Yip, now main stream media are saying that they are worried that Pakistan is rushing to complete a new nuclear facilitiy, that can make another 20 more nuclear warheads. We have known for years that they have these weapons. Why now should we be worried. Americas going to put them in the same boat as Iran. Maybe Obama will start a new axis of evil.
The Globelist really want war with Pakistan dont they. Attacking check points, and killing innocent people for years now with drone attacks.
Maybe this is a just reason to start a bombing run on there country.




TextKHUSHAB, PAKISTAN – Recent satellite images obtained by Fox News from the aerial imagery company GEOEYE show an expanding nuclear facility at the Khushab facility about 100 miles south of Pakistan's capital city of Islamabad. The pictures were taken on April 20 and indicate Pakistan is building a fourth nuclear reactor to produce plutonium.


www.foxnews.com...
edit on 18/01/11 by aarys because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 18 2011 @ 03:03 AM
link   
reply to post by aarys
 


I agree there is a smear campaign going on but the reactor seems unimportant considering Pakistan is already nuclear armed..



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 03:04 AM
link   
Innocent people with drone attacks? Hardly.
These people are far from innocent as you proclaim and support organisations like Al-Qaeda and the Taliban.
Drone attacks are incredibly accurate as well and goes through lengthy stages before they fire. If any 'innocents' are killed it's the cowardly fundamentalists fault for using Children and women as human shields in the pretext that the drones won't fire on them.

I say good.



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 03:11 AM
link   
reply to post by LondonerBLV
 


Lol dude, i wouldnt expect to see someone with views such as these on a site like this, open your mind a little & think outside the box that your trapped in.



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 03:17 AM
link   
Pakistan is of key strategic importance.

It is the only Islamic country that has nuclear capability.

The Taliban and Al-Qaeda has a large and significant presence there.
It is widely rumoured, and generally accepted, that both of them, and other extremist groups have cosiderable influence in both The Pakistan Army and their Securty Services.

Neither Israel, China and possibly most importantly India, will ever allow these extremists to gain control of these nuclear weapons.

It's not just the 'western' powers that are concerned with events in Pakistan.



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 03:22 AM
link   
reply to post by LondonerBLV
 


saadbinshahid.blogspot.com...
www.dawn.com...
www.globalresearch.ca...

Do u want me to keep going with civilian deaths from drones. I surpose if another country like lets say China bombed America because they were harbouring Masterminders of mass murder then that would be alright as well.



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 03:29 AM
link   
I like how you call it "Park"istan in your title.

That may be somewhat prophetic, as it seems the US is planning to "park" there sooner rather than later!



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 03:39 AM
link   
reply to post by notsofunnyguy
 


Thanks, Fixed the spelling.
But yes, you bring up a good point.



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 04:20 AM
link   
reply to post by notsofunnyguy
 


Does america have the manpower to fight Pakistan? I Don't think so. They first need to wrap things up in Afghanisthan and Iraq.
en.wikipedia.org...



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 04:28 AM
link   
Sounds good to me. I've worked with Pakastani muslims and most of them have nothing but contempt for the west. It's about time the U.S.got it's head out of it's arse and realized that Pakistan and the US.are not on the same team. The U.S. gave Pakistan 15 Billion in aid this year yet the pakistan parliment insults the U.S. and gives China a standing ovation calling it there new best friend. Screw them. A duplicitous ally at best. A true enemy at worst. It's only a matter of time before the Taliban (the soul of the nation) takes over not only Pakistan but it's nukes. If the U.S. does not act now it may be too late.



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 04:34 AM
link   
reply to post by Beginningoftheend
 



The U.S. gave Pakistan 15 Billion in aid this year


I highly doubt that..
Do you have a source or are you just pulling figures from your rear end??



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 09:54 AM
link   
reply to post by Beginningoftheend
 


Deny Ignorance...



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 10:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Beginningoftheend
 



A true enemy at worst. It's only a matter of time before the Taliban (the soul of the nation) takes over not only Pakistan but it's nukes. If the U.S. does not act now it may be too late.


Although many countries now have nukes there is still only one country that has ever used them and they killed many innocent civilians, women and children included..

Guess which terrorist country that was..



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 11:20 AM
link   
reply to post by backinblack
 
it was not in one year but over several years search.yahoo.com...

. reports suggesting the U.S. gave Pakistan $19 billion ... reports state that the U.S. gave Pakistan $1.5 billion dollars in aid last ... Quotes delayed at least 15 ...
www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2011/05/11/did-pakistan - Cached
Kerry Presents Pakistan With U.S. Demands on Militant Concerns
U.S. Sen. John Kerry gave Pakistan's army ... 2002, Pakistan has received more than $20 billion from the U.S., making the country one of the largest U.S. aid ...
www.foxnews.com/world/2011/05/15/kerry-pakistan-alliance... - Cached
A Timeline of U.S. Aid to Pakistan - Newsweek
... years, the U.S. has unloaded massive amounts of aid to Pakistan, including $7.5 billion ... more than $15 billion in assistance to Pakistan. ... That gave ...
www.newsweek.com/2009/10/21/about-those-billions.html - Cached
US gave Pakistan 20 Billion since 2002 › 2.0: The Blogmocracy
A number of media reports state that the U.S. gave Pakistan $1.5 billion dollars in aid last year. ... by Philip_Daniel - May 15, 2011 - 1:12 pm: Comments (6) - 13 ...
www.theblogmocracy.com/2011/05/11/us-gave-pakistan-20... - Cached
The United States gave 5 billion dollars in aid to Pakistan ...
Last month the United States gave 5 billion dollars in aid to Pakistan and another whopping 4 billion dollars ... February 11, 2011 at 11:15 PM
paknet.net/the-united-states-gave-5-billion-dollars-in... - Cached
U.S. seeks $2 billion in military aid for Pakistan
[Oct 22, 2010] ... Reuters) - The United States announced $2 billion in military aid for Pakistan on ... homes with $7.5 Billion in AID you gave Pakistan now ... delayed by at least 15 ... ( 16 Comments )
www.reuters.com/article/2010/10/22/us-usa-pakistan... - Cached
U.S. plans to give Pakistan $2 billion in military aid
The Obama administration is planning to ask Congress for $2 billion to give to Pakistan for military aid to fight against extremist groups.
personalmoneystore.com/.../2010/10/22/pakistan-military-aid - Cached
Obama signs $7.5 billion Pakistan aid bill – CNN Political ...
... com/cnn/2009/images/10/15/art.obama1015.gi.jpg caption="Obama signs $7.5 billion Pakistan aid bill. ... the extremism that threatens Pakistan and the United States ...
politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/15/obama-signs-7-5... - Cached
Report: $6 billion in aid to Pakistan poorly tracked - CNN
The United States has not accurately tracked about $6 billion it gave to help the Pakistani government ... Report: $6 billion in aid to Pakistan poorly tracked
articles.cnn.com/2008-06-24/politics/pakistan.pentagon... - Cached
PressTV - Quick Facts: US aid to Pakistan
From 2001 to 2008 the U.S. gave Pakistan over $10 billion in aid, with most of it ... under Kerry-Lugar Law from $7.5 billion to $15 billion in five years. Pakistan ...
presstv.com/usdetail/167368.html - Cached

Promotional Results

Make Yahoo! Your Homepage

Everything you love on the Web, all on your Yahoo! homepage.
www.yahoo.com

More search results



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 11:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by Freeborn
Pakistan is of key strategic importance.

It is the only Islamic country that has nuclear capability.




Wouldn't Iran fit into that category?



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 11:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Beginningoftheend
 



A true enemy at worst. It's only a matter of time before the Taliban (the soul of the nation) takes over not only Pakistan but it's nukes. If the U.S. does not act now it may be too late.


Although many countries now have nukes there is still only one country that has ever used them and they killed many innocent civilians, women and children included..

Guess which terrorist country that was..
yes that is true but think how many lives it did save, for how long do you think the US and Japan war would have lasted 1945 till??? 1946 ? 1950? 1960? without the use of the bomb.



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 11:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by blupblup

Originally posted by Freeborn
Pakistan is of key strategic importance.

It is the only Islamic country that has nuclear capability.




Wouldn't Iran fit into that category?


They don't have nukes.



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 11:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by SLAYER69

They don't have nukes.



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 11:36 AM
link   
reply to post by blupblup
 


They might have plants but it's a lot of work to refine enough materials. As of now they don't have 'The Bomb'(officialy)


Plutonium239 isotope. Around 25 pounds (10 kg) would be enough. If you could find some Uranium235, that would be good, but not great. You would need to refine it using a gas centrifuge. The uranium hexafluoride gas is piped in a cylinder, which is then spun at high speed. The rotation causes a centrifugal force that leaves the heavier U-238 isotopes at the outside of the cylinder, while the lighter U-235 isotopes are left at the center. The process is repeated many times over through a cascade of centrifuges to create uranium of the desired level of enrichment. To be used as the fissile core of a nuclear weapon, the uranium has to be enriched to more than 90 per cent and be produced in large quantities.
Source



posted on May, 18 2011 @ 11:38 AM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 
has anyone done a count on Pakistan's nukes? search.yahoo.com... Iran does not have them yet?? or do they?? Iran and NK are buddy buddy.see this story www.nytimes.com... things could get ugly sooner than once thought

www.ndtv.com... what the video is about

With reports emerging of rapid build-up and stockpiling at Pakistan's Khushab nuclear site - enough nuclear material for 100 warheads - we discuss how potentially harmful this can be if the rogue elements in Pakistan get their hands on these warheads.


Read more at: www.ndtv.com...
if India is worried we should be as well. What if the death of OBL was a cover story , they went in to get a stolen nuke but missed it and used OBL death as a out.


edit on 18-5-2011 by bekod because: added info. and word edit. added link



new topics

top topics



 
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join