Originally posted by b3l13v3
reply to post by tgidkp
Could be. Although if you already made the decision not to receive a traffic ticket, then you're at a CDV2 level.
Keep being an independent thinker friend.
....
. In short, without self-love, instead of beautiful, you shall think yourself an old beldam of fourscore; instead of youthful, you shall seem just
dropping into the grave; instead of eloquent, a mere stammerer; and in lieu of gende and complaisant, you shall appear like a downright country clown;
it being so necessary that every one should think well of himself before he can expect the good opinion of others. Finally, when it is the main and
essential part of happiness to desire to be no other than what we already are; this expedient is again wholly owing to self-love, which so flushes men
with a good conceit of their own, that no one repents of his shape, of his wit, of his education, or of his country; so as the dirty half-drowned
Hollander would not remove into the pleasant plains of Italy, the rude Thracian would not change his boggy soil for the best seat in Athens, nor the
brutish Scythian quit his thorny deserts to become an inhabitant of the Fortunate Islands. And oh the incomparable contrivance of nature, who has
ordered all things in so even a method that wherever she has been less bountiful in her gifts, there she makes it up with a larger dose of self-love,
which supplies the former defects, and makes all even. To enlarge farther, I may well presume to aver, that there are no considerable exploits
performed, no useful arts invented, but what I am the respective author and manager of: as first, what is more lofty and heroical than war? and yet,
what is more foolish than for some petty, trivial affront, to take such a revenge as both sides shall be sure to be losers, and where the quarrel must
be decided at the price of so many limbs and lives? And when they come to an engagement, what service can be done by such pale-faced students, as by
drudging at the oars of wisdom, have spent all their strength and activity? No, the only use is of blunt sturdy fellows that have little of wit, and
so the more of resolution: except you would make a soldier of such another Demosthenes as threw down his arms when he came within sight of the enemy,
and lost that credit in the camp which he gained in the pulpit.
But counsel, deliberation, and advice (say you), are very necessary for the management of war: very true, but not such counsel as shall be prescribed
by the strict rules of wisdom and justice; for a battle shall be more successfully fought by serving-men, porters, bailiffs, padders, rogues,
gaol-birds, and such like tag-rags of mankind, than by the most accomplished philosophers; which last, how unhappy they are in the management of such
concerns, Socrates (by the oracle adjudged to be the wisest of mortals) is a notable example; who when he appeared in the attempt of some public
performance before the people, he faltered in the first onset, and could never recover himself, but was hooted and hissed home again: yet this
philosopher was the less a fool, for refusing the appellation of wise, and not accepting the oracle's compliment; as also for advising that no
philosophers should have any hand in the government of the commonwealth; he should have likewise at the same time, added, that they should be banished
all human society.
And what made this great man poison himself to prevent the malice of his accusers? What made him the instrument of his own death, but only his
excessiveness of wisdom? whereby, while he was searching into the nature of clouds, while he was plodding and contemplating upon ideas, while he was
exercising his geometry upon the measure of a flea, and diving into the recesses of nature, for an account how little insects, when they were so
small, could make so great a buzz and hum; while he was intent upon these fooleries he minded nothing of the world, or its ordinary concerns.
Next to Socrates comes his scholar Plato, a famous orator indeed, that could be so dashed out of countenance by an illiterate rabble, as to demur, and
hawk, and hesitate, before he could get to the end of one short sentence. Theo-phrastus was such another coward, who beginning to make an oration, was
presently struck down with fear, as if he had seen some ghost, or hobgoblin. Isocrates was so bashful and timorous, that though he taught rhetoric,
yet he could never have the confidence to speak in public. Cicero, the master of Roman eloquence, was wont to begin his speeches with a low, quivering
voice, just like a school-boy, afraid of not saying his lesson perfect enough to escape whipping: and yet Fabius commends this property of Tully as an
argument of a considerate orator, sensible of the difficulty of acquitting himself with credit: but what hereby does he do more than plainly confess
that wisdom is but a rub and impediment to the well management of any affair? How would these heroes crouch, and shrink into nothing, at the sight of
drawn swords, that are thus quashed and stunned at the delivery of bare words?
113
Now then let Plato's fine sentence be cried up, that "happy are those commonwealths where either philosophers are elected kings, or kings turn
philosophers." Alas, this is so far from being true, that if we consult all historians for an account of past ages, we shall find no princes more
weak, nor any people more slavish and wretched, than where the administrations of affairs fell on the shoulders of some learned bookish governor.
International Philosophy I @ International Philosophy II
www.youtube.com...