It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
I never understood why there were ever any visitation rules to begin with.
If you want to visit me come visit me.
If I dont want you there I'll press the little button and ask that you be removed.
Why are there visiting rules at all? Let alone "laws." What kind of nonsense is that?
Originally posted by beezzer
So you give me an article that is supposed to show how we all think the same?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Wake up and smell the coffee, Scooter. The only ones that follow talking points and a lock-step that'd make a nazi proud are the progs who don't say "boo" until they get the okay from HuffPoo first!
Originally posted by SpectreDC
Originally posted by beezzer
So you give me an article that is supposed to show how we all think the same?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Wake up and smell the coffee, Scooter. The only ones that follow talking points and a lock-step that'd make a nazi proud are the progs who don't say "boo" until they get the okay from HuffPoo first!
If you're too blind to see the neocons and figures on the "right" who do the same to supposed conservatives than you're just as bad as them, bro.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by SpectreDC
Originally posted by beezzer
So you give me an article that is supposed to show how we all think the same?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Wake up and smell the coffee, Scooter. The only ones that follow talking points and a lock-step that'd make a nazi proud are the progs who don't say "boo" until they get the okay from HuffPoo first!
If you're too blind to see the neocons and figures on the "right" who do the same to supposed conservatives than you're just as bad as them, bro.
Sure the GOP does it, but not with the fervor of the government-luvin' left! T'is why I'm an Indy.
Originally posted by RicoMarston
Originally posted by The Old American
Don't get me wrong here, because while I don't personally support same-sex marriage (under my own legislation, the "It's Icky" Act) I would not vote against it. If two people love each other, and want to spend the rest of their life together, then they should be allowed to...if the state allows it.
That being said:
In 2006, 60% of state voters signed off on changing the constitution to ban gay marriage and a "legal status identical or substantially similar to marriage" for same-sex couples.
It looks like if they want this changed, they're going to have to get the people to vote differently. It's pretty specific that "civil unions" or "domestic partnerships" are covered under that legislation. It sucks, and it's backwoods hicksville, but there it is. Unless I'm reading it wrong, of course.
/TOA
you act as though the People organized the vote in the first place. where were the teeming masses clamoring for legislation against gays? they weren't there. this issue was forced onto the american people by a very small, very religious minority. the people who turn out to vote do not represent an unbiased cross-section of the true society, but rather the most ardent advocates of each side.
if there was a vote on a law banning ham sandwiches, and i didn't care for them one way or another, i wouldn't vote. if someone DETESTS ham sandwiches to the point that they don't want others eating them, they would support it. the only people who voted against the ban would be avid ham sandwich eaters. so even though the law is wrong and the TRUE majority probably doesn't even care, the ham sandwich is banned.
it doesn't matter whether the law violates the state constitution, the amendment to the Wisconsin state constitution violates common sense American values. All men are created equal. 'nuff said.
[snip] “Is the GOP hatred for gays so pervasive that they could really be this cold and heartless?”
Walker is literally going out of his way to prevent two people in a loving, committed relationship from visiting one another at the hospital. In other words, at what is quite likely a couple’s darkest hour, Scott Walker wants to impose legal restrictions barring two people from being with one another.
Originally posted by Lord Jules
The problem here is not Walker Wisconsin Ranger but the two party system. A republican group is suing because the registries violate a 2006 amendment, and a democratic group is suing because this lawsuit violates a 2009 law. The article even says Walker is askng a judge to rule, so he is not dictating the law, so the problem is not Republican Walker per se, but the Republican and Democrat system. Democracy is the problem. Two groups want different things because they are different types of people, and continuously change the law, thereby over regulating the real majority that want nothing to do with the system and just want to be left alone. The two parties WILL NEVER AGREE because they are fundamentally different. They only serve to keep libertarian views away from the focus of the debate. Republicans want no gays, Democrats want gay rights, independents want neither and are stuck in the middle of this nonsense, so naturally they oppose both sides.