It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wcitizen
Originally posted by adeclerk
reply to post by wcitizen
Thank you for your civility! Most "chemtrailers", when asked to give evidence, request that the debunkers "prove a negative". I am, however, disappointed that you continue to keep your head in the sand and ignore evidence, instead going on faith that the "chemtrail" conspiracy exists. If your mind ever opens to the evidence, I'll be more than happy to link you.edit on 5/18/11 by adeclerk because: (no reason given)
You have an imagined assumption that I keep my head in the sand - that's because I don't see things the way you do, nor do I ignore evidence, nor do I base my beliefs on faith - life has taught me how unwise that is.
I don't discuss chemtrails on ATS any more, nor do I discuss 9/11 on ATS any more. It's like trying to discuss something in a noisy, rowdy bar with brawls going on all over the place.
I respect that your opinions are different from mine, and that you feel strongly about it. I have no wish to insult you by insinuating you are ignoring significant information or keeping your head in the sand. Simply, we are interpreting information differently. I hope you will offer me the same respect. Thanks.edit on 18-5-2011 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SaveTheWolves
I have been to the website contrail science numerous times over the years. Yup, there certainly are contrails, never said there weren't.
Originally posted by SaveTheWolves
However, our government has not exactly been forthright with their use of the general population as guinea pigs. There is a l-o-n-g list of atrocities committed by the US government against it's citizens. Including how US citizens were secretly used as test subjects during the Cold War. Not to mention how the EPA told citizens in NYC just days after 9-11 that it was perfectly safe to go outside onto Wall Street because the air was safe to breathe.
Originally posted by SaveTheWolves
Whoever controls the world's weather, controls the world.
I think anybody who thinks the major world players are not interested in altering the weather is very naive.
Originally posted by SaveTheWolves
I also think that anybody who thinks the experiments have not already begun is very naive.
Originally posted by SaveTheWolves
I still find it very odd that some people will spend so much time trying to convince others that they are right and we are wrong...even to the point where they want to close down the discussion. If they don't like the discussion perhaps they should pick a different topic. Because personally, I take the air I breathe very seriously.
Originally posted by SaveTheWolves
I did not come here to constantly be called childish names or to have my words twisted by people who have their own agenda.
Originally posted by wcitizen
reply to post by wcitizen
reply to post by adeclerk
Good, so you don't believe that "persitent contrails" or "contrails that spread out into clouds" are chemtrails, if I am understanding you correctly.
I'm pretty sure the risk was only to those who spent a lot of time in and around the wreckage (like firefighters and cleanup).
a report by the EPA’s Office of the Inspector General released on Aug. 21 states, among other criticisms, that the White House reviewed and even changed EPA statements about public health risks to make them sound less alarming. The report charges that the White House Council on Environmental Quality influenced “the information EPA communicated to the public through its early press releases when it convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones.” The report cites “reopening Wall Street” and “national security” as reasons for the spin.
I hope you aren't suggesting that government denial of chemtrails indicates that they might be occurring
They are most certainly interested, that's why the "owning the weather in 2025" paper was written by students at the Air Force's university, there is interest in controlling weather in the future.
Debunking is my hobby. When I see people making claims from ignorance and without evidence on "chemtrails", I like to point out how they are incorrect in hopes that they will learn how to use objective, verifiable evidence in order to form an opinion that isn't based on faith. Can we at least agree that this forum needs to be split into a "Chemtrail" forum and a "geo-engineering" forum?
Sorry about the chemie comments, I understand where you are coming from, when I created my first thread, the second response didn't even relate to it, it was asking if I had an assignment on using the word "hoax".
As for the agenda, I have no agenda other than to deny ignorance, isn't that the very essence of this website?
reply to post by adeclerk
I apologize for insulting you. From here on out I will respect your right to ignore any evidence you want.
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Guys it's been interesting reading your too and fro, but your discussion is entirely OT - would you care to comment on whether you consider the forum a sucess or not?
Originally posted by adeclerk
Originally posted by wcitizen
reply to post by wcitizen
I apologize for insulting you. From here on out I will respect your right to ignore any evidence you want.
reply to post by wcitizen
And I will respect yours to continue to insult even though you say you aren't. Lol!
Originally posted by GringoViejo
I'm not insulting you, but yes, you are ignoring evidence.
You don't want to be wrong, and that's okay.
The only thing you do by withdrawing from the debate or discussion, is concede to the fact no evidence exists of "chemtrails"
Originally posted by wcitizen
Originally posted by GringoViejo
I'm not insulting you, but yes, you are ignoring evidence.
You don't want to be wrong, and that's okay.
The only thing you do by withdrawing from the debate or discussion, is concede to the fact no evidence exists of "chemtrails"
Tjhis is exactly the obtuseness which is common to debukers. So many of you just HAVE to resort to ad hominem's.
How do you know what I want? That is incredibly arrogant and so typical of so many debunkers. So many of you are so incredinly arrogant that you claim to know what others think, believe and want better than they do themselves. You impute motive, belief, etc. on no basis at all except prejudice. For me, that means that your point of view is of no interest whatsosever.
You know, I would love to be wrong. I would love to know that they aren't spraying toxins on us. In your arrogance you will not believe what I say, but that's of no importance to me either.
As I've already said, I don't join discussions about chemtrails on ATS, it's like trying to have an interesting conversation in the middle of a cheap bar with people brawling all around.
edit on 18-5-2011 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)edit on 18-5-2011 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)edit on 18-5-2011 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)
You impute motive, belief, etc. on no basis at all except prejudice
reply to post by GringoViejo
"Chemtrailers" have had every piece of evidence refuted, and can only resort to passing judgment on "debunkers" and their alleged motives.
Originally posted by GringoViejo
[
Yet you're in a discussion about "chemtrails"
You impute motive, belief, etc. on no basis at all except prejudice
There you go again, assuming motive and asserting it as fact. I have never said I have no interest in the topic. I have said I don't discuss chemtrails or 9/11 on ATS.
[quote[
If you are attempting to "enlighten" us, your talk of arrogance is painfully ironic.
You really do seem to have a problem with comprehending what is written. I haven't discussed chemtrails at all, so there is no basis whatsoever for you to imagine that I might wish to enlighten anyone.
If you have no interest, I'm sure you can find the door.