It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON – The Senate is taking up a bill Tuesday that would repeal about $2 billion a year in tax breaks for the five biggest oil companies, a Democratic response to $4-a-gallon gasoline that might fare better when Congress and the White House negotiate a deal later this year to increase the government's ability to borrow. The evening vote is expected to fail.
But Democrats hope to build their case to include the measure in a deficit-reduction package being negotiated by key lawmakers and the Obama administration. Lawmakers from both parties are demanding deficit reduction as part of deal to increase the government's ability to borrow and avoid an unprecedented default on U.S. Treasury bonds.
The oil companies are "doing just fine at every level of their business, and we're giving them a taxpayer subsidy?" said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. "This is a place to start."
The heads of the five oil companies defended the tax breaks at a Senate hearing last week, saying they just want the same tax advantages enjoyed by other industries. The companies are Shell Oil Co., ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, BP America and Chevron Corp
Together, they logged profits totaling $36 billion during the first quarter. The Democrats say that with profits that high, the big oil companies wouldn't miss tax breaks that average $2 billion a year.
The report said eliminating the tax breaks would raise about $1.2 billion in 2012. By comparison, the five oil companies had combined revenues of $1.5 trillion last year.
It is time the conservatives understand that taxes must be raised if we are to balance the budget which I think should be priority number one, above all else.
Originally posted by David9176
reply to post by Misoir
It is time the conservatives understand that taxes must be raised if we are to balance the budget which I think should be priority number one, above all else.
It's time for them to realize that corporate welfare has to end. I'm sure that many who call themselves conservatives don't realize how much money is being handed to corporations that have a majority of their operations overseas...hiring more in other countries than our own.
They say they need to make profits to make jobs....well where are the jobs????????????? Record profits...yet job growth is minimal and mostly crappy low paying jobs replacing good ones that have left.
The corporate elite are in complete control and your vote means less than nothing. Politics is just a media event while the real decisions are made on country club golf courses between the real players that have no names.
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
reply to post by Janky Red
Are you mocking me? ~_~
We need a free market, that is why subsidizing oil (or anything else) is not good for the market, going to war for oil isn't good for the market either. Nothing the government does is good for the market.
Tonight, Republicans filibustered the majority’s attempt to repeal $21 billion in subsidies for the big five oil companies — the same companies that made over $30 billion in profits in just the first three months of 2011. While three out of four Americans believe Exxon Mobil and the other oil majors should pay their fair share, instead of receiving taxpayer welfare, the oil-friendly Senate split 52 to 48 to end the subsidies. Though the majority of the Senate voted to repeal these oil tax breaks, the procedural motion required a 60 vote threshold.
An analysis of campaign contribution records shows the gusher of dirty cash that fueled the filibuster:
A Center for American Progress Action Fund analysis finds that the 48 senators who sided with Big Oil received over $21 million in career oil contributions, while 52 senators who sided with the American people received only $5.4 million in contributions. Each senator who voted for Big Oil received on average more than four times as much oil cash as those who voted to end the subsidies.
Originally posted by Screwed
reply to post by David9176
So, are we taking any bets on how this will turn out?
I've got $100 on big oil!
any takers??
Originally posted by mc_squared
It's official:
Tonight, Republicans filibustered the majority’s attempt to repeal $21 billion in subsidies for the big five oil companies — the same companies that made over $30 billion in profits in just the first three months of 2011. While three out of four Americans believe Exxon Mobil and the other oil majors should pay their fair share, instead of receiving taxpayer welfare, the oil-friendly Senate split 52 to 48 to end the subsidies. Though the majority of the Senate voted to repeal these oil tax breaks, the procedural motion required a 60 vote threshold.
Source
I'm shocked, shocked I tells ya.
edit on 17-5-2011 by mc_squared because: I'm so shocked I forgot to post the link
The 50's, 90% tax rate on the big boys and what happened??? So here we have tried 30 years of the opposite approach and look what we have? In my half decade on here, nobody has been able to reconcile this fact
Defending virtues that are currently based upon corruption is what is wrong, do what puts money in the regular guys pocket and money will flow up, like it does naturally.
A Center for American Progress Action Fund analysis finds that the 48 senators who sided with Big Oil received over $21 million in career oil contributions, while 52 senators who sided with the American people received only $5.4 million in contributions. Each senator who voted for Big Oil received on average more than four times as much oil cash as those who voted to end the subsidies.
Originally posted by Janky Red
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
reply to post by Janky Red
Are you mocking me? ~_~
We need a free market, that is why subsidizing oil (or anything else) is not good for the market, going to war for oil isn't good for the market either. Nothing the government does is good for the market.
So what do you do when the market is poised to execute America because it is profitable to do so?
It makes financial sense to do so, so what do you do then? You on the side of your ideas or your people?
edit on 17-5-2011 by Janky Red because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by David9176
And they still lived like kings.....and amazingly at the same time people had jobs....with usually only one parent having to work to support a family and own a home! And OMG...people had pensions that were protected! HOW DID WE EVER MAKE IT THROUGH THAT TYRANNICAL PERIOD.