It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Yeah, since it was passed under cover of night, with no transparency (As promised, but not delivered), secret deals made to get people to go along, major State backed lawsuits on its constitutionality, the fact that no where in the Constitution it states HC is a right, the fact it goes against State's Rights, the fact that it forces Citizens to buy or pay a fine.
Yeah, just an opinion
shure shure!!!
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by macman
It allows them a temp get out pass up to 2014, which then allows then to reapply in 2014.
If the company can't survive without the Govt giving them special passes, then they should not be open for business.
100% incorrect.
Please go educate yourself.
That is almost word for word from the article. SO, who is wrong?
It is simple, lets slow it down even further, and if you need, I can break out the crayons.
If a company today, can't provide health care for their employees, then they should not get an out from the Govt. The environment today, was created by Obama and his political minions. Now they offer a fix for the problem they created. In what sane world is that not outrageous?
It is not the job of Govt to dictate what a company offers in terms of healthcare, benefits, retirement or position.
As for the companies not being supporters? Funny, since most that have gotten the waivers are within the districts of said politicians.
On a side note, did you just learn the term "ad hominem"? You throw it around as if you just read it off a sayings of the day calendar or are just trying to come off smarter that the rest of us.
Originally posted by jjkenobi
I thought one of the main points of Obamacare was the healthcare industry in collusion with big business can't be trusted to provide adequate coverage or costs for the working Joe. Corporations would milk the avg worker for every dime and if that meant cutting benefits or raising premiums they would do it. Now I'm hearing businesses are taking such good care of their employees they don't want to stoop down to the Obamacare level? Why do we even need Obamacare since these thousands of companies are taking such good care of their employees? (I won't even get into the unemployed since 78% of people who go bankrupt from health reasons already have insurance.)
Originally posted by jjkenobi
I thought one of the main points of Obamacare was the healthcare industry in collusion with big business can't be trusted to provide adequate coverage or costs for the working Joe. Corporations would milk the avg worker for every dime and if that meant cutting benefits or raising premiums they would do it. Now I'm hearing businesses are taking such good care of their employees they don't want to stoop down to the Obamacare level? Why do we even need Obamacare since these thousands of companies are taking such good care of their employees? (I won't even get into the unemployed since 78% of people who go bankrupt from health reasons already have insurance.)
Originally posted by spyder550
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by macman
It allows them a temp get out pass up to 2014, which then allows then to reapply in 2014.
If the company can't survive without the Govt giving them special passes, then they should not be open for business.
100% incorrect.
Please go educate yourself.
That is almost word for word from the article. SO, who is wrong?
It is simple, lets slow it down even further, and if you need, I can break out the crayons.
If a company today, can't provide health care for their employees, then they should not get an out from the Govt. The environment today, was created by Obama and his political minions. Now they offer a fix for the problem they created. In what sane world is that not outrageous?
It is not the job of Govt to dictate what a company offers in terms of healthcare, benefits, retirement or position.
As for the companies not being supporters? Funny, since most that have gotten the waivers are within the districts of said politicians.
On a side note, did you just learn the term "ad hominem"? You throw it around as if you just read it off a sayings of the day calendar or are just trying to come off smarter that the rest of us.
You still don't get it
1 The companies and organizations are providing healthcare -- it is not very good it is something.
2. The companies are not being forced to buy anything or not buy anything - the are going to be allowed to remain status quo (that means not changing)
3. The waivers have nothing to do with the districts -- to say otherwise is Bull# -- prove me wrong.
4. The is no gain for a company to get a waiver -- they could choose not to offer insurance and wash their hands of the whole thing
Like I said you seem to be incapable of understanding this -- your response show a clear misunderstanding of the facts.
Originally posted by beezzer
All you folks that are for this healthcare nightmare, could any of you explain WHY the majority of waivers are for labour unions, SEIU, et al?
Seems to me that the folks asking to be let out of this travesty were the ones who pushed for it in the first place.
It is unconstitutional. It is an intrusive measure that would garner 60% of the economy. Now I'm sure you folks are just giddy over that fact and wee yourselves with the idea of greater government control, but there are a few of us who jut can't abide the thought of faceless beaurocrats making medical decisions for us.
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by beezzer
Get ready for the Alinsky style retort.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Here’s the list of known unions* getting ObamaCare waivers:
1.Service Employees Benefit Fund
2.UFCW Allied Trade Health & Welfare Trust
3.IBEW No.915
4.Asbestos Workers Local 53 Welfare Fund
5.Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 123 Welfare Fund
6.UFCW Local 227
7.UFCW Maximus Local 455
8.Local 25 SEIU
9.UFCW Local 1262
10.Local 802 Musicians Health Fund
11.Greater Metropolitan Hotel
12.Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund
13.I.U.P.A.T.
14.Transport Workers
15.UFT Welfare Fund
16.UABT
www.redstate.com...
Just to add, I've read the bill. The second a stipulation or any change occurs in someones "mini-plan" the government steps in to take over.
YOU may want someone to make decisions for you, but I sure as hell don't!
Originally posted by beezzer
All you folks that are for this healthcare nightmare, could any of you explain WHY the majority of waivers are for labour unions, SEIU, et al? Seems to me that the folks asking to be let out of this travesty were the ones who pushed for it in the first place.
It is unconstitutional. It is an intrusive measure that would garner 60% of the economy. Now I'm sure you folks are just giddy over that fact and wee yourselves with the idea of greater government control, but there are a few of us who jut can't abide the thought of faceless beaurocrats making medical decisions for us.