It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Chemtrailers" and "Debunkers," a modest proposal.

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 16 2011 @ 07:35 PM
link   
How about a debate in the debate forum?

The topic I propose: "Chemtrails" Exist.

One person from each side argues their points as per the rules of the debate forum, and maybe we can shed some light on what "chemtrails" are supposed to be.

So, Any takers for either side?

Any suggestions on rewording the topic?


edit on 16-5-2011 by GringoViejo because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 16 2011 @ 07:54 PM
link   
reply to post by GringoViejo
 


The problem is that different people mean different thing by "Chemtrails" - some people even say that since contrails contain aircraft exhaust, which is chemicals, then contrails are chemtrails, hence chemtrails exist.

You also need a claim that can clearly be disagreed with. You can't say "the government sometimes sprays things from planes", as they do sometimes, for pest abatement.

Something like: "most long lasting trails are deliberately sprayed and are not the natural consequence of air travel"?

Perhaps a chemtrailer could define what they believe in.



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 07:58 PM
link   
I'll debate any chemtrailer in the debate forum. Bring it on!



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 07:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Uncinus
 


Indeed.

I'm sure one of them has a better idea of what they think is happening.

Maybe a series of "chemtrail" debates is required. That way we could discuss each basic idea of the theories.



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 08:01 PM
link   
reply to post by _BoneZ_
 


Same here!

Then at least we can get some answers in an un-biased format.

Plus it will be fun



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 08:25 PM
link   
I didn't even know there was a "Debate" forum!! S&F



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 08:34 PM
link   
reply to post by GringoViejo
 


There has been a couple of Chemtrail debates held previously in the debate forum but a new perspective could be a good thing.



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 09:15 PM
link   
That would be such a change! A debate without insults would help get a good picture of both sides.
I'd like to see that!



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 09:48 PM
link   
reply to post by NowanKenubi
 


That is exactly the goal I'm aiming at.

No "chemtrailers" yet though



posted on May, 29 2011 @ 06:23 PM
link   
Still no takers from the "chemtrail" side.





posted on May, 31 2011 @ 06:46 AM
link   
Surely there are people who believe on chemtrails that are willing to debate the topic...

And the debate forum is the perfect place...

Anyone?



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 06:58 AM
link   
reply to post by GringoViejo
 





posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:05 AM
link   
I guess the debunkers win by default then



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:19 AM
link   
you might as well offer to debate the existence of Santa Clause and the Easter bunny as well. All are just as real.



new topics

top topics



 
6

log in

join