moon landing hoax, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 5-8-2004 @ 09:20 AM by pushkin
And also
www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov...

The Earth has two regions of trapped fast particles. The inner radiation belt discovered by Van Allen is relatively compact, extending perhaps one Earth radius above the equator (1 RE = 6371 km or about 4000 miles). It consists of very energetic protons, a by-product of collisions by cosmic ray ions with atoms of the atmosphere. The number of such ions is relatively small, and the inner belt therefore accumulates slowly, but because trapping near Earth is very stable, rather high intensities are reached, even though their build-up may take years.


reply posted on 5-8-2004 @ 02:06 PM by Sunofone
Originally posted by Codemaster_01
I'm a retired economics professor, not a physicist or engineer. But I've studied enough science to know that going to the moon isn't impossible--

you are truly unaware of the actual relavence of this statement
how does the study of a lie make it true?-im not tyring piss anyone off-im new to this board and am tyring to interject my thoughts on the subject-im not much into archive diving-i am convinced that that the military machine has abused its authority and forced some good people to stretch the truth under the guise of national security-there seem to be many people here who have anger issues and are unable to pay attention to the details of my posts reacting with frustration and arguing issues not even in question-i think jra was the only one who noticed that i have been talking about "cosmic radiation" -or radiation BEYOND the vab---i cannot prove my claims only try and relate my perspective
www.clavius.org...
now this link does not argue my case and is just a reference to avoid confusion-the truth is there will never be proof satisfactory enough to prove beyond a resonable doubt that we cannot endure cosmic radiation until we traverse it again-which in my opinion will be never-as it cannot be done-there will always be a reason not to go whether its a lack of money,desire or need

the apollo missions were the only to venture into this type of radiation-the belts act as a sheild for earth blocking the radiation in question-how many poeple blindly replied about the belts radiation content,its thickness,or even crying about locking the thread because i havent read the archives-
without reading my posts-

Originally posted by Codemaster_01

I don't intend to change anyone's mind. I learned long ago that once one's mind was made up, no amount of logic or another's experience can change it. I can only hope to warn others before they are taken in by illogical propositions.


noble stance-
the only difference between us is that i am trying to warn others that HAVE been taken in by illogical propositions -those of us who are covinced of a govt lie are not trying to disrespect anyone caught up in the middle of this fiasco and do not intend on slandering anyones honor-im sure every single person that did not have a need to know didnt-which really would be a small crowd-just dont deny the logical plausibilty of a national security issue requiring the comendering of a space agency-the biggest problem we face is the military machine's dedication to a sustained campaign-in a one world govt the machines only purpose is to thin the herd-we just have to realise that we are indeed under a world govt as we speak-

whosoever preaches about censorship should be censored


reply posted on 5-8-2004 @ 10:18 PM by Sunofone
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Sunofone, No one is crying about anything except you.

Please respect the fact that this is a forum where (civil) debate is encouraged. You have been challenged on a number of claims that you have made in your posts, yet you refuse to address those challenges.

For instance you claim that the Van Allen Belts are a “Shield,” but you also claim that they are dangerous. Your logic is confusing and your supporting data non-existent.

You claim that the Apollo astronauts were the only ones to venture beyond the Van Allen Belt, yet you have not responded to any of my questions regarding Skylab, the Russian Space Station or the International Space station. Where were/are these in relation to the Van Allen Belts?





the van allen belts act as a sheild protecting earth from cosmic radiation-in doing so there is a concentrated band of radiation that flows around the earth known as the van allen belts-so yes the belts act as a shield and are dangerous-skylab,mir and the iss all are well below the belts-a human has never traversed beyond the belts yet that is exactly what you have been led to believe and all necessary precautions have been taken in order to do so-the data supporting this theory exists but is not accepted due to the mass brainwashing that americans are subject to-most americans think that a single truck bomb demolished the federal oklahoma murrah building-yet the evidence speaks for itself-watch alex jones's 9/11 the road to tyranny-it can be downloaded from this link for free-right click on the desired format and click "save as"
www.archive.org...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 10 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 4 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 2 days ago with 26 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 14 days ago with 22 member flags
Stunning close view of Mercury
  Posted 3 days ago with 20 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 11 days ago with 19 member flags