posted on May, 16 2011 @ 11:35 AM
Originally posted by James1982
I am getting so tired of this ANONsense (HO! I made word!)
The whole "we are a group.... but were NOT a group!" is REALLY getting on my nerves.
If ANYONE can be Anon, then, ANYONE can claim they are Anon when they do things. Yet people say "oh Anon didn't really do that" So then not
everyone can be Anon? Get the story straight please.
Anon are supposed to be a collective of anybody, without any kind of command structure. Yet, the Anonymous fan boys always say that any
unpopular/unsuccessful activity is ''not really Anon'' and that any moderately successful/popular activity is the work of Anon.
We are told, when they steal card details, use flashing lights on an epilepsy forum, and bully children, that ''Anon has said that they weren't
responsible, and it's an individual using the name of Anonymous, or some agency trying to discredit the group''. Well, how would you know ? Who is
the reliable Anonymous source that is telling you this, and who is contradicting the whole set-up of the group, and, most importantly, why are you
believing a statement from some anonymous poster claiming to represent Anonymous ?
The whole premise doesn't make sense.
People claim that some of their embarrassing and humiliatingly disastrous ''operations'' are the work of an individual hiding behind the name of
the group, because someone purporting to represent Anon denied that they were responsible. So, how does one know that the shame-faced denials aren't
the action of someone claiming to be a representative of Anon ?