It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ButterCookie
Ummm...
but again, you are generalizing everything to be 'human-like'...
the reason that we would vaporize is because we are carbon and water based....everything in the universe does not have to be.
And if was a gaseous species, does that make it not legit?
You also stated that it would be unidentifiable or unrecognizable (to whom, US?) and WE humans determine what is life in the universe?? We barley can leave Earth pretty good and will be near death by the time we leave our own solar system. yet we determine what counts and what doesn't?
Originally posted by Fuzz420
From the reserching I have done, i believe its the "Nordics" that are from this binary star system
Originally posted by ButterCookie
Originally posted by vexati0n
Ummm...
but again, you are generalizing everything to be 'human-like'...
the reason that we would vaporize is because we are carbon and water based....everything in the universe does not have to be.
And if was a gaseous species, does that make it not legit?
You also stated that it would be unidentifiable or unrecognizable (to whom, US?) and WE humans determine what is life in the universe?? We barley can leave Earth pretty good and will be near death by the time we leave our own solar system. yet we determine what counts and what doesn't?
Originally posted by vexati0n
Originally posted by ButterCookie
Originally posted by vexati0n
Ummm...
but again, you are generalizing everything to be 'human-like'...
the reason that we would vaporize is because we are carbon and water based....everything in the universe does not have to be.
And if was a gaseous species, does that make it not legit?
You also stated that it would be unidentifiable or unrecognizable (to whom, US?) and WE humans determine what is life in the universe?? We barley can leave Earth pretty good and will be near death by the time we leave our own solar system. yet we determine what counts and what doesn't?
Actually even a diamond would vaporize before it got close enough to the Sun to touch it. But more to the point, what you propose is to broaden the definition of "Life" so far that it becomes essentially meaningless. In many ways, fire exhibits the characteristics of life: it grows, it reproduces, it consumes, it dies, etc. It is obviously not life, though. In order for life to be meaningful and recognizable to us, it will necessarily need to conform to certain standards: it must be able to communicate, it must be able to transfer knowledge from one generation to the next, it must be able to remember, and it must be able to do all of these things in ways which we can comprehend: otherwise, it might as well not be life at all.
Originally posted by zookey
I really doubt the "star" is inhabited, it would be too hot to live on the surface wouldnt it?
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by descartes90
alpha centuri is a star - so no , there is negligable chance it is inhabited
is alpha centruri orbited by an inhabitted planet ? - unknown - we have yet to even see evidence of planets - let alone life in that system
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by descartes90
alpha centuri is a star - so no , there is negligable chance it is inhabited
is alpha centruri orbited by an inhabitted planet ? - unknown - we have yet to even see evidence of planets - let alone life in that system
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by descartes90
alpha centuri is a star - so no , there is negligable chance it is inhabited
is alpha centruri orbited by an inhabitted planet ? - unknown - we have yet to even see evidence of planets - let alone life in that system
Originally posted by descartes90
I was reading about the system on Wikipedia, apparently, like Z. Reticuli, it is a binary system composed of 2 Sun-like yellow stars. The metal content is similar to our sun, and though there is no evidence of brown dwarfs or gas giants there, it's speculated there could be planets there.
Have you ever heard of any cases of ETs from the Alpha Centauri system?
Originally posted by Rev_Godslapper
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by descartes90
alpha centuri is a star - so no , there is negligable chance it is inhabited
is alpha centruri orbited by an inhabitted planet ? - unknown - we have yet to even see evidence of planets - let alone life in that system
Our Sun is a star. It is inhabited (humans, monkeys, cats, dogs) by a planet called Earth. We have evidence that planets exists because we kind of live on one.
Alpha centuri is probobly not a star system that harbors life. But there is evidence that life may exist on other pieces of rock.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 5/18/2011 by Rev_Godslapper because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sailor Sam
Originally posted by descartes90
I was reading about the system on Wikipedia, apparently, like Z. Reticuli, it is a binary system composed of 2 Sun-like yellow stars. The metal content is similar to our sun, and though there is no evidence of brown dwarfs or gas giants there, it's speculated there could be planets there.
Have you ever heard of any cases of ETs from the Alpha Centauri system?
As Alpha Centauri is a star, or a pair of stars, it is highly unlikely that there is life on it/them.
Unless there are planets circulating around it/them that may be able to support life
Just like there is no life on our sun, but ther is life on planet Earth.