It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Congress Will Vote To Declare World War 3

page: 5
94
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 16 2011 @ 06:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by Damian-007
ATS should ban you. No ifs, no buts. Advertising your blog is unconscionable conduct and you should suffer consequences.


People like you are the reason the world is in the mess it's in.
edit on 16-5-2011 by awareness10 because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 16 2011 @ 06:54 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 07:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by alexhiggins732
The offending text uses doublespeak to declare World War 3. Specifically, the text uses the phrase “affirms” “armed conflict” which is the terminology used by congress declare war in every war since World War 2.


Ummm, the last time Congress actually declared war was WW2. Every conflict since then has been by executive order or justified using the War Powers Act.



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 08:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by The Old American
They had darn well better hold a vote on it! Otherwise, it would be unconstitutional!


/TOA
IMHO it's unconstitutonal anyway as was "the patriot act".("voted" on or not Just because somebody puts it to a vote doesn't amend the constitution with its three equal branches of govt. ).

Just another: "OH no!"... I can't believe this is hapenning! what are these congress critters thinking????



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 08:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by 46ACE

Originally posted by The Old American
They had darn well better hold a vote on it! Otherwise, it would be unconstitutional!


/TOA
IMHO it's unconstitutonal anyway as was "the patriot act".("voted" on or not Just because somebody puts it to a vote doesn't amend the constitution with its three equal branches of govt. ).

Just another: "OH no!"... I can't believe this is hapenning! what are these congress critters thinking????


Unconstitutional or not... if passed it becomes law.

To revoke it you would need to file in the supreme court, with the law in effect already.

Since we are talking absolute power over the militarty, they can simply declare the ones who challenge the law as supporting hostilities against the US and send in the marines to wipe out whoever challenges the constitutionality. Hence, a huge problem with this bill.



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 09:34 AM
link   
reply to post by nolabel
 


they got my vote
hell lets get it over
ill sit back and have a beer



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 09:40 AM
link   
Don't have time to read this thread right now but its looks important. So a quick comment to bookmark.

ALS



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 09:52 AM
link   
There are only 2 ends to this vicious pattern we have set in front of us.

Either we elect Ron Paul who is the only POTUS candidate who understands the Foreign Policy this country was founded on.

Or the US Military needs to wake up and realize they are no longer defending the constitution or the people that the constitution was meant to defend. They are nothing more than the strongest tool of power for the elite. They need to realize they are not cared for by those who send them into these unconstitutional wars. Obama is never going to knock on my door and steal my constitutional rights. He will send one of you. If the military can stand up and say we have had enough there will be nobody left to do the dirty work for these elitists.



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 10:00 AM
link   
reply to post by wildshoetwt
 


You are so right.

I also looked up the Defence guy mentioned in the above blog, Howerd Buck McKeon, who advocates very strong defence (and attack) for the USA. He's a banker by trade and helped in his campaign by Lockeed Martin, Northrop Grunman, General Dynamics and Boeing These lobbyistsd all are interested in warfare and defence, what a cosy little group that makes. He is hardly likely to consider dead soldiers and civilians when he takes a decision.

It infuriatee me that your and our soldiers march to the bankers orders, who are ultimately ruled by the rothschilds. Perhaps we ought to get them out of the closet and make them take on the role of government out in the open, why pay twice for the same service that way if you wish you can get rid of Obama and his groupees? Also with us out of the picture they can use their own little soldiers to do their banking bidding. Then WW3 will only involve those whose fight it is anyway and leave the rest of us in peace.



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 10:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by alexhiggins732
Unfortunately, many do no believe unless it is printed in the corporate media. Voted up your comment! As far as world war 3, that is exactly what it is.

Even the ACLU calls it a declaration of a new world wide war!


I may not always believe what the "corporate media" says. HOWEVER, I also don't take what the ACLU says at face value, as they also have their own agenda.

I instead use my own judgement based on raw information, not on information spun from others.




edit on 5/16/2011 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 10:22 AM
link   
- Few days ago, we learned that police would enter in you home and you cannot resist.
- Now we cannot oppose to the government because president can wage war on his own citizens.

AND WE ARE LIVING IN DEMOCRACY ???



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 10:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by LaTouffe
- Few days ago, we learned that police would enter in you home and you cannot resist.
- Now we cannot oppose to the government because president can wage war on his own citizens.

AND WE ARE LIVING IN DEMOCRACY ???



Yes, we are living in a Democracy... which is why things like this happen. This is why we were founded as a Republic, because our Founders believed, and rightly so, that Democracy was the road to socialism and tyranny.



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 10:36 AM
link   
one step closer to the new world order



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 11:11 AM
link   
Some of you people disgust me. I had to recheck to make sure I was still on ATS. First off, get your info straight before using your fingers to hit the keys and show your ignorance, I deny you. Yes, the OP was to the posters blog but it is obvious that you stopped at who wrote it and didn't see the 9+ credible sources posted within it. Oh and hey can't you think for yourself and research instead of attempting to derail or discredit because someone else didn't post a link, go find it yourself. Go back to sleep little ones.

This is a very important topic, as it is a continuation of an attempt at World dominance, that the US Government has taken upon itself to police the planet and assert its assumed authority regardless of Human Rights or Dignity for that matter. Is it WW3? Who cares! Get over the technicalities of a number. Even if it is WW2012 it doesn't change the fact that the United States has made the declaration that they can legally decide the fate of the people of the World by assumed authority illegally.

We all understand that this is but a continuation of past proclamations and legislative allowances, a loop hole filler as you will, and yet it continues to happen. Just make sure you are bending over while enjoying that brewsky, since that seems to be more important to you.

It is no longer a matter of putting the Government in check for the restrictions placed on its own people. Now it is a matter of fighting for the planet from a global dictatorship that the Government has become. The United States has yet again broken treaties signed with the UN, yet the UN has no recourse, as they themselves have broken it showing the consent of the UN. www.un.org...

It is the Unalienable Right of the People of the Planet Earth to fight for their Freedom from any tyranny or limiting Dictatorship. Wasn't that what it all started with? Nations all over the Globe are standing up and denying ignorance and repression yet the American People sit back and sips a cold one or uses(insert your favorite drug here) instead of following suit. We are allowing this to happen by doing nothing out of fear of our own Government because we are taught to comply.

"Question Authority" was a movement that was spoken, yet here we are, a decade later and we still are allowing the Government to fulfill the prophesy of the "Great War". Oh wait, it's already too late so just sit back and enjoy that beer and pretend it was someone elses fault.



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 11:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by readytorevolt
There are only 2 ends to this vicious pattern we have set in front of us.

Either we elect Ron Paul who is the only POTUS candidate who understands the Foreign Policy this country was founded on.

Or the US Military needs to wake up and realize they are no longer defending the constitution or the people that the constitution was meant to defend. They are nothing more than the strongest tool of power for the elite. They need to realize they are not cared for by those who send them into these unconstitutional wars. Obama is never going to knock on my door and steal my constitutional rights. He will send one of you. If the military can stand up and say we have had enough there will be nobody left to do the dirty work for these elitists.

I agree that Ron Paul has the intention and the drive to right this sinking ship of a country...

Do you really believe that TPTB ( the real ones you can see) will let him succeed?
He will either wind up dead or he will start to swim in the same direction as the rest of the "dead fish" in D.C..

The more things change, the more they are the same. Alphonse Karr »



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 11:47 AM
link   
reply to post by alexhiggins732
 



having a hard time finding DATES......
when is this UP for voting/debate...

do we have time to write letters to our reps????


and Good Post BTW..

thanks for the heads up!!!
alex!!!
edit on 5/16/11 by darrman because: had to adjust spellllinglish

edit on 5/16/11 by darrman because: add a line



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 12:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by darrman
reply to post by alexhiggins732
 



having a hard time finding DATES......
when is this UP for voting/debate...

do we have time to write letters to our reps????


and Good Post BTW..

thanks for the heads up!!!
alex!!!
edit on 5/16/11 by darrman because: had to adjust spellllinglish

edit on 5/16/11 by darrman because: add a line


The sneaks have put in in various defense bills, was linked a few pages back.

1) Sign the ACLU Petition - secure.aclu.org...

2) There is also an email template there that you can use to send to your congress man.

3) Get the word out. Raise awareness we can not allow this to happen.



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 12:24 PM
link   
reply to post by alexhiggins732
 


got it..


you took a lot of #~# on this thread..

thank you for Sticking with it...

IT IS THAT IMPORTANT..!!



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 12:25 PM
link   
Ok, one of the several version floating around...

www.govtrack.us...

The version of that bill will include the text on that link, along with some comprise of, Mc Cain's bill (also linked on previous pages), and most likely others floating around, along with this long version armedservices.house.gov...

According to Gov Track


This bill was considered in committee which has recommended it be considered by the House as a whole. Although it has been placed on a calendar of business, the order in which legislation is considered and voted on is determined by the majority party leadership. Keep in mind that sometimes the text of one bill is incorporated into another bill, and in those cases the original bill, as it would appear here, would seem to be abandoned.


Last Action: May 11, 2011: Mr. Reed asked unanimous consent that the Committee on Armed Services have until 5:00 p.m. on May 17 to file a report on H.R. 1540. Agreed to without objection.

Other Titles: -- Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 201



www.govtrack.us...



posted on May, 16 2011 @ 12:26 PM
link   
I was curious. Other than your own blog that you wrote and have claimed as your source. Do you have a single shread of evidence to support this?



new topics

top topics



 
94
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join