It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Geoengineering describes activities specifically and deliberately designed to effect a change in the global climate with the aim of minimising or reversing anthropogenic (that is human caused) climate change. Geoengineering covers many techniques and technologies but splits into two broad categories: those that remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere such as sequestering and locking carbon dioxide in geological formations; and those that reflect solar radiation. Techniques in this category include the injection of sulphate aerosols into the stratosphere to mimic the cooling effect caused by large volcanic eruptions.
Originally posted by jaydeePNW
I am an amature photographer and can tell you that photography cannot be used to tell the difference of the color of the sky. I can use the same camera and lense and adjust a few settings to make the sky look different. Different lenses with the same settings will have a different look also. The angle of the sun will change the look. If you are near the ocean the sky will change with an onshore breeze compared to an off shore breeze. On shore breeze will carry more moisture in the air than off shore breeze ect.
I don't see it possible to compare photography over time as an accurate measurement of the color of the sky.edit on 16-5-2011 by jaydeePNW because: spelling
Originally posted by binkbonk
WHY TALK ABOUT IT IF IT DOESN'T EXIST?
Geoengineering describes activities specifically and deliberately designed to effect a change in the global climate with the aim of minimising or reversing anthropogenic (that is human caused) climate change. Geoengineering covers many techniques and technologies but splits into two broad categories: those that remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere such as sequestering and locking carbon dioxide in geological formations; and those that reflect solar radiation. Techniques in this category include the injection of sulphate aerosols into the stratosphere to mimic the cooling effect caused by large volcanic eruptions.
Originally posted by binkbonk
IMO, the color of the sky has not changed. The point of contention is the behavior of "contrails" left behind jets. IE; persistent, lingering, spreading out, connecting with other "contrails", blanketing the sky... etc. The color of the sky is a strawman argument that you choose to focus on.
Why?
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by binkbonk
IMO, the color of the sky has not changed. The point of contention is the behavior of "contrails" left behind jets. IE; persistent, lingering, spreading out, connecting with other "contrails", blanketing the sky... etc. The color of the sky is a strawman argument that you choose to focus on.
I focus on the arguments people bring up. But the same memory argument also applies to the behavior of contrails. And that's something that CAN be demonstrated with photos. So I'd be happy to discuss that too.
Originally posted by binkbonk
Why?
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by binkbonk
IMO, the color of the sky has not changed. The point of contention is the behavior of "contrails" left behind jets. IE; persistent, lingering, spreading out, connecting with other "contrails", blanketing the sky... etc. The color of the sky is a strawman argument that you choose to focus on.
I focus on the arguments people bring up. But the same memory argument also applies to the behavior of contrails. And that's something that CAN be demonstrated with photos. So I'd be happy to discuss that too.
Originally posted by binkbonk
reply to post by Uncinus
It doesn't really matter if you can back up your claims or not. Even though you cannot provide indisputable proof to clear the chemtrails of geoengineering particulates, it doesn't matter. The government is constantly running illegal, secret programs and it is in the common citizens best interest to highly scrutinize everything they do, because they do it with our consent and our tax dollars. But it's even far beyond that. So whether you can prove that there are no geoengineering particulates in those chemtrails or not, there are still sinister government plots occurring all around the world... You want me to provide proof? If that's your request, I suggest you continue taking the Blue Pill, and go buy a bigger flat screen tv.
Originally posted by Upthepunx
reply to post by Uncinus
nope i still see blue skes where im from. mabey you need to move AWAY from the big cities like LA or NYC. and mabey you need to stop thinking that everything is 'fake" and implanted. also if you think its so easty to "suggest" memories to people and they buy it you need to work out your weak mind and not be influenced by simple jedi mind tricks
Originally posted by SaberTruth
Wow... not only can't we believe our lyin' eyes, we can't trust our own memories, though no implantations were done on thousands of people all over the world. Of course, deniers have excellent memories and never get false ones implanted, and they don't have lyin' eyes to worry about.
Originally posted by binkbonk
reply to post by Uncinus
No I'm saying it doesn't matter that you have no proof and you cannot back up your claims. Why? Because even if you could provide proof, there are many other things going on that are bad and so our human predicament does not get any better even if you could prove what you are trying to prove.
You are so right @@@1000TonBlocks@@@ these are worthless shills.