Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

MSNBC - Ron Paul To Chris Matthews:"Saying I'm For Property Rights Therefore I Am A Racist Is A Gi

page: 1
128
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+95 more 
posted on May, 13 2011 @ 09:53 PM
link   


LOL MAN
Ron Ripped Chris a new one and i'll say something else
Ron made a good point, he said that he can't come into his office because of property rights he can be on T.V.
Speaking of morality, Chris is lucky to have property rights and so does MSNBC and Fox News
There should be no right wing news or left-wing news, there should be only news

But the Govt. has no right to walk into MSNBC's or Fox News's head office and say you need to be more unbiased.
And that sends a very strong message as well and property rights may be allowing Chris to keep his job.

But this demagoguery is ridiculous
It is nice though, to have someone running for president to not want to participate in all this smoke and mirrors

Ron definitely evolved since interviews during 2008, he's even better at handling such interviews lol


He RIPPED Chris A New One!!!




+12 more 
posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:02 PM
link   
Yeah he's definitely gotten more fire under his ass since he announced yesterday. I'm glad he's being more assertive when talking to these douche bags. . I think its working.
edit on 13-5-2011 by mayabong because: (no reason given)


+25 more 
posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:04 PM
link   
reply to post by ModernAcademia
 


comparing heroin to racism mathews has really fallen far.

i will tell everyone this ron paul can walk into my house or business

but chris matthews would not be able to come because i have a sign up that says " no idiots allowed"


+11 more 
posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:07 PM
link   
You know ... after watching this, I am most def voting for the guy.



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:09 PM
link   
hehhe let em have it RON !!!!!


+1 more 
posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:12 PM
link   
This is truly US Political Madness, either at it's finest or at it's worst I can't decide
I've seen MSNBC use the racist card way too often

I had posted a thread a while ago about someone on MSNBC saying "Some call Obama a socialist, socialist has become the new codeword for the N word"


Unbelievable, too much demagoguery on MSNBC

Chris is going to have a hard time sitting down on this one
And I disagree with his last statement "This is hardball it's what we do"
No it's not what you do, it's what you do to conservatives not with liberals that you want in office

I'm not trying to bring partisanship in this amazing message, but MSNBC is MSNBC


+2 more 
posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:15 PM
link   
reply to post by ModernAcademia
 


I do love me some Ron Paul. Good clip of him actually getting time to speak and make a point.

I also agree on the subject of property rights. I believe someone has the right to refuse service just as I have a right to refuse to use their business. I don't believe that the law can teach or enforce morality.


+11 more 
posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:15 PM
link   
Hold on, hold on...

Did you hear that?

"I know it's growing and you may well win this thing."

Did I really just hear Chris Matthews say that Ron Paul could be the next POTUS?

I can't believe my ears...

Woo Hoo pigs are flying in celebration of hell freezing over!!!

I'm lovin it!

The Ron Paul Revolution baby!


edit on 13-5-2011 by wearewatchingyouman because: funny fingers



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by wearewatchingyouman
Hold on, hold on...

Did you hear that?

"I know it's growing and you may well win this thing."

Did I really just hear Chris Matthews say that Ron Paul could be the next POTUS?

I can't believe my ears...

LOL
ya that was surprising for me to
But that is also a conspiracy in it's own right

Did you notice no other viable republican is bidding other than possibly Newt?
Are they planning to give a massive mess to Ron Paul after they completely robbed the nation?

"Look, this is what free market does" - Some Idiot



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:23 PM
link   
)reply to post by ModernAcademia
 


Not a big fan of Tingles. Too much of a shrill shill. Ron Paul has evolved his message, but I fear it may be too late for him. He’s what? 78? And no, I am not bashing solely because of his age. He seems quite vigorous and lively.

Que Monty Python: I’m not dead yet!


I would like to see his running mates platform before I would vote for him. Personally, I like Herman Cain, but he needs to evolve his positions as well. GROAN, Now I’m going to be called a racist for saying evolve.


But I could see myself getting behind this man. We'll see in a year or so.
edit on 13-5-2011 by TDawgRex because: $#*%@! Grammer.....and again! Wish I had opposable thumbs



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:26 PM
link   
heres my chris matthews moment

if and when ron paul gets elected to potus i will " get a chill up my leg"



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:33 PM
link   
i'm voting for Ron Paul no doubt. When he gets elected then I'll know we are about to get TRUE CHANGE.
edit on 5/13/2011 by Humint1 because: spelling



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:37 PM
link   
reply to post by ModernAcademia
 


I hope his stance on drugs doesn't come back to haunt him in the end. There are a lot of people in this country who are strongly opposed to drugs not sanctioned and regulated by the government. I'd be really interested to see what he would be able to do as president, and would even vote for him if he wasn't so opposed to the separation of church and state.
edit on 13-5-2011 by Torgo because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:43 PM
link   
from my understanding of pauls stand is that most if not all decisions

should be at state level and its not the governments business to legislate morality.

maybe i heard wrong.



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Torgo
I hope his stance on drugs doesn't come back to haunt him in the end. There are a lot of people in this country who are strongly opposed to drugs not sanctioned and regulated by the government.

Addicts being locked = stronger addiction when they get out
All that stress being locked up, they need a fix

just like smokers, they quit but when they come back they come back harder
this is fact

if someone is an addict you don't throw them into a cage
you don't throw sick people in a cage, you help them, you rehab them


+12 more 
posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:52 PM
link   
Listening to him made me remember the good old days when helmets weren't required, you could ride in the back of the pick up truck, don't need to wear the seatbelt.....ahhh, freedom.......

He's the best choice, I hope he gets in, before the rest of the freedoms disappear.



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 10:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
from my understanding of pauls stand is that most if not all decisions

should be at state level and its not the governments business to legislate morality.

maybe i heard wrong.

You are correct and this is the original republican platform

the people cannot have any control over an out of control federal govt.
but the people have a much stronger voice at the state level and therefore more influence

He's against abortion, but would leave it up to the states

Universal Healthcare however with the word universal would require it to be federal, so he is against that and it wouldn't be possible to hand it off the states

The only reason I know this is because Ron Paul is an open book, his complete opposite is Obama
Anything that you want to know about Ron, that information is accessbile, he has spoken on every topic pretty much and in detail with incredible consistency for 30yrs



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 11:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Torgo
reply to post by ModernAcademia
 


I hope his stance on drugs doesn't come back to haunt him in the end. There are a lot of people in this country who are strongly opposed to drugs not sanctioned and regulated by the government. I'd be really interested to see what he would be able to do as president, and would even vote for him if he wasn't so opposed to the separation of church and state.
edit on 13-5-2011 by Torgo because: (no reason given)


His stance on drugs is right on the mark. If someone wants to kill themselves with that trash, that's their choice. And if they think they can suck the government teet under Dr. Paul's administration and continue to be nothing but drains on the economy they'll get big surprise.

As far as his stance on the philosophy of "separation of church and state", so he has a personal problem with that. He also has a personal problem with abortion, but he won't stand in the way of it because that's a person's choice. He won't let that philosophical "wall" come down.

/TOA



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 11:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Torgo
 


I agree with a lot of what Ron Paul says. I am for Freedom of choice as long as it doesn't harm others. I don't see a problem with his stance on drugs as long as it's regulated and not abused by the user. I am also for prostitution since it's one of the oldest profession in history. It should be maintained as a business with workers rights.

Read your history and you will know why our founding fathers distanced them selves from the church.
edit on 13-5-2011 by Stalker619 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 11:54 PM
link   
reply to post by snowspirit
 


I have thought the same thing. I miss the good 'ol days.

But I have also been accused of the actions of my youth now cause todays younguns' to have no fun.


I guess it's my fault.






top topics



 
128
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join