posted on May, 13 2011 @ 11:03 PM
nevermind, links from previous post have been fixed.
And if Wilcock is painting Kali as a negative being that's his problem. Maybe he should research her more, she's way more than just a destroyer. As
far as I know she destroys people's delusions in order to point the way to the truth. (and yeah, not nice the way she might do it, but for the best if
you can handle it.) To help people develop better aspects of themselves. She's not a negative being as far as I know, and if he thinks she is and
carries on peddling that, I feel kind of sorry for him.
Then again, maybe that's the tip of the iceberg when it comes to his ideas about what's going on. Maybe he should try researching Hinduism a bit,
because that's pretty bad. Kali seems cool, as long as you don't wind her up.(!) She seems to represent an energy that most of us can barely even
Gotta have some love for Kali. She seems fierce but wise. Try meditating instead of writing for a bit Wilcock, maybe you'll finally see.
From wiki :
Various Shakta Hindu cosmologies, as well as Shakta Tantric beliefs, worship her as the ultimate reality or Brahman. She is also revered as
Bhavatarini (literally "redeemer of the universe"). Comparatively recent devotional movements largely conceive Kali as a benevolent mother goddess.
Have a think about it, Mr. Wilcock.
edit on 13-5-2011 by robhines because: (no reason given)