Was looking into somethings about the raid that killed Osama, and like many other began to wonder about the official story, Fortunately I don't want
to make this about if Osama is a puppet or not, or any direct conspiracies involving the existence of Osama.
So with that being said Id like to start this with the premise that.
A. The U.S. Did do a covert mission in pakistan involving US soldiers.
B. This mission was to kill someone. (really doesn't matter who, for the sake of this post that is)
Now with the above stated a few facts about Pakistan.
A.7th largest army in the world.
B. Allied closely with China.
C. Has nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them over distance.
D. Has stated it can defeat India's anti missile shield.
E. Does not have an anti-first use nuclear policy.
So if the above is true (debatable of course) the question of why all the inconsistence in the story might be explained, but again thats not what I
want this post to be about I am proposing a how we did it scenario and why, I will start with this article. FROM 2002
In 2002 the US military asked MIT to develop a super soldier uniform that could enhance strength, defeat small arms fire, and be invisible.
Surely fast forward 10 years and we should have this tech in the bag.
Theres a video of an invisible person boarding a US tank...
So my proposal is that the US not only needed to go into a sovereign nation but into their capital and near a military base, a country with ties to
china (and US ally) who has nukes with a policy that does not discount first use in a conflict. So we needed to do it with out the country knowing,
and with out engaging the countries military.
So they sent in the invisible choppers and invisible troops, this could explain all the discrepancies with the story (do you honestly think we are
going to tell the world how we entered a modern countries capital and killed a defended foreign national), AS well as serve as notice to every
countries leadership around the world, you can have air defenses, you can have nukes, and you can have a military base in the city we want to attack
and it wont stop us from getting to you.
I dont think this was about Osama at all, it was about putting people who would question the US as a super power on notice (ie decide not to use our
currency, etc.). Its the US showing the world what a 600 billion defense budget buys you plain and simple, much like the shooting down of a satellite
from a navel vessel was to show China we could do it better.
So what do you guys think?
edit on 13-5-2011 by benrl because: Broken link
edit on 13-5-2011 by benrl because: (no reason given)
Honestly I don't think this takes anything away from Seal team 6, if anything it just makes all of our special forces that much more Bad Ass, and safe
in the field if true. (again no casualties in the raid)
edit on 13-5-2011 by benrl because: last part added.
Haha, Ive been watching the development of the invisible stuff (as well as X-ray tech, as I would think most red blooded males would... )
Was starting to think "come on you really think we are going to say how we did it" while reading all the post about the discrepancies in the raid. I
honestly think it has nothing to do with Osama, and more to do with.
A. Distract the US citizens
B. Tell every country that wants to stop using our currency to shut the hell up our you may get a visit from the invisible troops.
The video alone could be fake thats why I threw in the article, so its not like the Army hasn't been trying for invisible soldiers for the past ten
years. With just the video its questionable, with the article it makes more sense, to me at least.
were they invisible? you can say that... the seals are good at what they do and thats quiet stealthy kills. i wont doubt they have invisible camo but
i dont believe they needed it. the way the story goes i believe they could of used normal paratroopers and got the job done.
I read the thread title and my first thought was, 'Who the heck is this crackpot, that thinks the Navy SEALS are invisible? However, you have
completely changed my mind. Good research and convincing evidence. How appropriate for Team Six!
Hmm..the more I look at it the more i doubt it..but i really don't know..
If you go to 5:03 of this video..is looks drastically different then the other one, it almost looks like it/he's naked or almost like the image of
one of those things artist use and draw to make body proportions?
Also he is visible in the very first few seconds in this video and is not in the other.
I think if it's fake the way they could have done - They made a blurred object come in from the right side of the screen knowing that a solider would
be coming around from the front of the tank then merged the two together to give it the effect of becoming visible once both object met in the area
between the wall and the tank.
Really strange..I wonder if it is fake..who is faking it...and what is their motive behind it?
Someone trying to make other countries fearful of the US or someone trying to make the US people more fearful of their own country? or someone trying
to get more youtube views?..the list really goes on..
Pakistan wanting to examine the leftover parts of the downed helicopter, and share it with China as well, gives credence to your theory. Somehow I
think the technology that made it invisible (if there was such) was in the part that they set to self destruct..and that tail end isn't going to give
them many clues, though.
Well again, if the tech exist it may not be meant for complete invisibility, think of the predator, or the game crysis, this is exactly what the game
portrays. Yet the article was in 2002 so maybe the game took the lead from the article, but everyone here is always saying how the mass media prepares
us for these types of revelations.
So Crysis and Crysis main game mechanic is a suit that is described in that article, and the invisibility there is not 100% IE movement and shooting
disrupt it. So if you buy those theories this fits right in there.
In my opinion, the video showing the "invisible soldier" anomaly, is simply that, an anomaly. It's ghosting from a crap digital camera unable to track
a fast moving object that blends well with the background. I mean look at the quality of the video and the poor tracking.
Second, someone already posted the comment in YouTube that I was going to say here. If technology like this existed, it wouldn't be given to some
third-rate tank crew, who sits inside a vehicle all day, and seemingly gets out to turn on his invisible suit to go take a wizz, then run back
really fast invisible like.
Just trust me on this. Technology like that, if it existed, probably wouldn't even be used in Iraq or Afghanistan, it's just rather silly. Even for
"wet work". These battlefields, they just don't work like that. They're not the sort of battlegrounds that call for clandestine operations of the
highest magnitude with Metal Gear Solid technology. I pulled 2 tours in Iraq and spent the majority of my time "outside the wire" and have seen nearly
all of Iraq, border to border, for what it's worth.
As for the likelihood they were "invisible" on the Pakistan run, even then it's still silly. As the operation wasn't exactly a secret, was it? If they
went in completely under the radar and for all intents and purposes, literally invisible, what was their plan on explaining their sudden appearance if
the SHTF, or it just go too loud with too much collateral? They obviously coordinated with Pakistan on some level.
edit on 13-5-2011 by SyphonX
because: (no reason given)
Before the Crossbow, and archer had to be trained, he was a special soldier who took years to become the best in his field. You hand some jack ass the
cross bow and some training he's now competing with your trained archer.
and before the bow it was the sword. The entire human history of warfare is the development of better shields followed by better swords to beat
You make an invisible suit, then instead of training your seal to be stealthy, perhaps you train them in something else like cyber war fare? Maybe it
just increases his survival chances so you don't waste all that training to have him die?
In my opinion, there was no necessity for any kind of invisibility. The raid took place in the dark of night and any well planned raid would have
included cutting the power to the compound prior to entrance. So, they were already masked by the darkness.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.