It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alarm! HAARP Signals Off The Charts!! New Madrid Quake Imminent???

page: 4
71
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 14 2011 @ 01:11 AM
link   
reply to post by Cobaltic1978
 





You really are the font of all knowledge. You say Chemtrails are an hoax, 9//11 was all down to a bunch of Arabs with limited flying experience and now you are the ATS expert on HAARP.


Yup. Anything that goes against the official line is ridiculous and impossible and doesn't exist and you are an idiot if you believe anything other than that and you are fearmongering if you try to express a view other than than and it's pointless to argue because your ignorant and, and, and...




posted on May, 14 2011 @ 01:21 AM
link   
reply to post by coyotepoet
 


Just like fires always break out when someone somewhere else is carrying out a fire drill?



Originally posted by 1MrMarc
There is not much that any of us everyday Americans can do. Our only hope that there is a James Bond or group of Expendables that can stop this for us.


Mr Bond is currently securely tied to a table deep in my secret lair, with a laser beam aiming at his genitals ....... now no-one and nothing can stop HAARP teaching you Americans a lesson you will NEVER forget: how to make a proper cup of tea using fresh, BOILING, water! HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!

Oh, wait, the alarm has just gone off, I can hear gun shots ..... must go!
edit on 14-5-2011 by Essan because: typo



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 01:26 AM
link   
All right You guys in us,canada had better Blow up the haarp installation before it is too late. You wouldn't want to be swimming alongside the fishes. The great lakes may empty out down to the gulf of mexico.



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 01:30 AM
link   
I'm sorry guys. Like I said earlier this was from a friend on my email who asked me to pass it on. It's not meant for fear mongering. Maybe I should have changed the title. Yes there are alot of mistakes and yes there are some disturbing snippets about troops killing people and people killing troops.

But if all this is even partly true then hell will be where we live very soon.

Now, you can take all the conspiracies and all the facts of what is going on in this world past and present, mix it all together and what will u have?! A giant Sh*t sandwich that we are all going to have to take a bite out of.

There are a lot of questions that need to be answered. Examples:

What are the New World Order up to? What have they been up to? What is Agenda 21 (Depopulation) and Codex Allimentarius?

What is HAARP? What can HAARP do? If HAARP is not a weapon and is just a weather sensing device then why is it a Military project? What are they hiding? Why are there 38 HAARP stations worldwide plus at least 1 semi-submersible machine?

Why have the government plus alot of other oil companies deliberately blown a rig up which caused oil and chemicals to depopulate the gulf coast?

Why has Obama deliberately lied to the American people about subjects such as 9/11, Libya, Afghanistan, OBL killing in Pakistan?

What the hell is going on with Fukushima in Japan?

Why has some dumb blonde from Fox News told everyone radiation is safe and good for them?

Why has Al Gore gone on record to tell everyone about the ficticious theory of Global Warming?

Why is Bill Gates of Microsoft supporting vaccines and saying it will be good for Population control?


These are just a handful of the many questions that I would think of to ask whoever is in charge. Or if anyone here has any answers?


But the main question would be...........What In The Hell Is Going On Here????

Something's coming. It's dark and evil. And I'm not talking about Michael Myers!!



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 01:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Essan
 





Just like fires always break out when someone somewhere else is carrying out a fire drill?


Ummm..no. Apparently you missed my point. It is not someone somewhere, it is in the specific area where the things are happening. For instance, the NZ Defense Department "happening" to be in Christchurch when the EQ happened IN CHRISTCHURCH. Or the drills going on regarding a terrorist attack in a London subway when there was a terrorist attack IN A LONDON SUBWAY or running drills about planes running into buildings on the same day PLANES RAN INTO BUILDINGS. There is a specificity there that is not "someone somewhere else" as you so weakly tried to explain away.



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 01:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by coyotepoet
reply to post by Essan
Or the drills going on regarding a terrorist attack in a London subway when there was a terrorist attack IN A LONDON SUBWAY


There were no such drills


What there was was a crisis management training exercise planned for some company or other that day which involved a scenario in which bombs had gone off on the tube. Such desk exercises take place at one company or other almost every day, and have done so since the days the IRA used to try and blow up the City


Although only carried out at any given company maybe once or twice a year, they are no different to fire drills.



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 02:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Essan
 





There were no such drills What there was was a crisis management training exercise planned for some company or other that day which involved a scenario in which bombs had gone off on the tube. Such desk exercises take place at one company or other almost every day,




A fictional "scenario" of multiple bomb attacks on London's underground took place at exactly the same time as the bomb attack on July 7, 2005. Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants, a private firm on contract to the London Metropolitan Police, described in a BBC interview how he had organized and conducted the anti-terror drill, on behalf of an unnamed business client. The fictional scenario was based on simultaneous bombs going off at exactly the same time at the underground stations where the real attacks were occurring: POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now. HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise? POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on. (BBC Radio Interview, 7 July 2005) In response to the flood of incoming email messages, Peter Power --who is a former senior Scotland Yard official specializing in counterterrorism-- responded in the form of the following "automatic reply": "Thank you for your message. Given the volume of emails about events on 7 July and a commonly expressed misguided belief that our exercise revealed prescient behaviour, or was somehow a conspiracy (noting that several websites interpreted our work that day in an inaccurate / naive / ignorant / hostile manner) it has been decided to issue a single email response as follows: It is confirmed that a short number of 'walk through' scenarios planed [sic] well in advance had commenced that morning for a private company in London (as part of a wider project that remains confidential) and that two scenarios related directly to terrorist bombs at the same time as the ones that actually detonated with such tragic results. One scenario in particular, was very similar to real time events. However, anyone with knowledge about such ongoing threats to our capital city will be aware that (a) the emergency services have already practiced several of their own exercises based on bombs in the underground system (also reported by the main news channels) and (b) a few months ago the BBC broadcast a similar documentary on the same theme, although with much worse consequences [??]. It is hardly surprising therefore, that we chose a feasible scenario - but the timing and script was nonetheless, a little disconcerting. In short, our exercise (which involved just a few people as crisis managers actually responding to a simulated series of activities involving, on paper, 1000 staff) quickly became the real thing and the players that morning responded very well indeed to the sudden reality of events. Beyond this no further comment will be made and based on the extraordinary number of messages from ill informed people, no replies will henceforth be given to anyone unable to demonstrate a bona fide reason for asking (e.g. accredited journalist / academic). [ signed ] Peter Power"


Source

It is the timing and "coincident" nature of the scenarios that are important. Find me documented proof of those exercises going on somewhere in London "at one company or another" every day or else you are just blowing smoke. Surely with all of the companies you have to choose from you could find proof of drills happening almost every day and not just on the same day where the scenario actually played out...

or...


CIA Sponsored Exercise on the Morning of 9/11 On the morning of September 11 2001, within minutes of the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the CIA had been running "a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building". The simulation was held at the CIA Chantilly Virginia Reconnaissance Office. The Bush administration described the event as "a bizarre coincidence". The matter was not mentioned by the media.(AP, 22 August 2002) The CIA sponsored simulation consisted in a "scheduled exercise" held on the morning of September 11, 2001, where "a small corporate jet crashed into one of the four towers at the agency's headquarters building after experiencing a mechanical failure. (Quoted in Associated Press, 22 August 2002.) The news concerning the 9/11 Chantilly aircraft crashing simulation was hushed up. It was not made public at the time. It was revealed almost a year later, in the form of an innocuous announcement of a Homeland Security Conference. The latter entitled "Homeland Security: America's Leadership Challenge" was held in Chicago on September 6, 2002, barely a few days before the commemoration of the tragic events of 9/11. The promotional literature for the conference under the auspices of the National Law Enforcement and Security Institute (NLESI) stated what nobody in America knew about. On the morning of 9/11, the CIA was conducting a pre-planned simulation of a plane striking a building. One of the key speakers at the National Law Enforcement and Security Institute conference was CIA's John Fulton, Chief of the Strategic War Gaming Division of the National Reconnaissance Office a specialist in risk and threat response analysis, scenario gaming, and strategic planning. (See . The National Law Enforcement and Security Institute website is: www.nlsi.net... See also The Memory Hole at www.thememoryhole.org...): On the morning of September 11th 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team at the CIA were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they know that the scenario would come true in a dramatic way that day. Information is the most powerful tool available in the homeland security effort. At the core of every initiative currently underway to protect our country and its citizens is the challenge of getting the right information to the right people at the right time. How can so much information from around the world be captured and processed in meaningful and timely ways? Mr. Fulton shares his insights into the intelligence community, and shares a vision of how today's information systems will be developed into even better counter-terrorism tools of tomorrow. (Ibid)


I suppose that they have drills about planes running into buildings as frequently as fire drills as well, because that was an oh so common eventuality prior to 9/11

edit on 14-5-2011 by coyotepoet because: added 9/11 info



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 02:04 AM
link   
reply to post by coyotepoet
 


I saw his comments live on TV at the time and knew immediatey they'd be misquoted out of context to imply something else. No such exercise took place as he never made it to the offices of the company for which he had been contracted to hold it. His company (and many others) organise such exercises every week.

And note Mr Powell's own response - though I assume you'd just say he's lying?


edit on 14-5-2011 by Essan because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 02:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by Essan

Originally posted by coyotepoet
reply to post by Essan
Or the drills going on regarding a terrorist attack in a London subway when there was a terrorist attack IN A LONDON SUBWAY


There were no such drills


What there was was a crisis management training exercise planned for some company or other that day which involved a scenario in which bombs had gone off on the tube. Such desk exercises take place at one company or other almost every day, and have done so since the days the IRA used to try and blow up the City


Although only carried out at any given company maybe once or twice a year, they are no different to fire drills.


You need to do a bit more research on this before u say 'There Were No Such Drills'.

Oh yes there were. A plan for these drills was outlined a year before never mind on the morning. 7/7 was a False Flag attack just like 9/11. Have a look at this small documentary. This raises alot of questions as to what actually happened on that fateful day.

7/7 Ripple Effect

What you hear and see in the video makes alot more sense than the official story. Just like 9/11 there are too many inconsistences and media BS.



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 02:11 AM
link   
reply to post by coyotepoet
 


Or NLE 2010 with a simulated nuclear attack.

Oh wait...



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 02:19 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


2010!!!!!


LOL!!!

Spot on!.....well.....(checking my calendar.....hmmmmmm)



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 02:25 AM
link   
reply to post by stevcolx
 


Bottom line...

If it happens next week while people are just "coincidentally" prepared and positioned then it is not a coincidence. I conducted my "prediction"/warning in a slightly different manner. I sent a letter to 10 different people last month outlining a lot of the same things in the OP (except the more current info and encouragements to shoot and take out HAARP.) It was a prediction that there would likely be a NM earthquake next week during or just after the NLE 11. I stated that if it happened and I said something after the fact it could be written off as seeing connections where none exist but that by predicting it a month in advance based on nothing more than putting all of these "coincident" pieces together that it was something more than just coincidence (in that letter I also predicted some sort of big sacrifice that would make the news between Apr 19 and May 1 and then OBL was announced-the letter was sent on 4/18)

Each of the 10 people were chosen for specific reasons: they all have a large social network, they are all non-believers in the conspiracy side of things, and they are all close to me and know me well so they won't judge if nothing does happen next week. However, if it does they all agreed to forward my prediction letter to everyone they knew. Hopefully that way, if it does happen it will wake people up to the true nature of it.



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 02:29 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 





Or NLE 2010 with a simulated nuclear attack. Oh wait...


Well, they do have all those All-Cia-Duh nuclear threats going on now in the wake of the OBL puppet show. If it was a 2002 NLE about that you might have a point, but in the scheme of things 2010 isn't that far in the past and they wanted to separate it out from the Earthquake drill in 2011 to sharpen focus.

BTW, here is a link to all of the other FEMA exercises since 2000. One could right it off as preparedness, but one could also see it as planning.

www.semp.us...

This thread is starting to look familiar....Essan, Weedwhacker, Chadwickus. Boy you guys really do run in a pack don't you. What's up? No Chemtrail threads for you guys to jump all over?


edit on 14-5-2011 by coyotepoet because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 03:04 AM
link   
reply to post by coyotepoet
 


Stick to the topic....

A nuclear event would be every NWO/TPTB?Elite's wet dream wouldn't it?

And it didn't happen...and creating an earthquake seems a whole lot less likely if you ask me, the logistics of setting off a nuke vs creating an earthquake makes it even more obvious.



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 03:08 AM
link   
reply to post by stevcolx
 


I dont think you are fearmongoring or anything of the sort. I think you are on to something, and you have done a lot of research and put some time into this one. Keep up the good work. I totally believe something is on the horizon.




posted on May, 14 2011 @ 03:16 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 





A nuclear event would be every NWO/TPTB?Elite's wet dream wouldn't it? And it didn't happen..


Yes it would, and not yet anyway. But they are trying hard with the All-CIA-duh and OBL propaganda to set it up for happening. I'm not saying a disaster has to happen every time they have an exercise (which is why your's and Weedwhackers self-congratulatory comments about NLE 10 are just that) but it's interesting that almost every time there is a major disaster/false flag, there happens to be an exercise going on.



and creating an earthquake seems a whole lot less likely if you ask me, the logistics of setting off a nuke vs creating an earthquake makes it even more obvious.


It's pointless to argue what even I acknowledge at this point is a hypothetical. However it's only a week away so we'll see pretty soon. If it happens next week it's been called. If not then good-disasters suck.

edit on 14-5-2011 by coyotepoet because: development



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 04:37 AM
link   
Every time a HAARP activity reported, a volcano erupts, seismic activity somewhere in the world or a solar storm starts; there is always somebody saying the New Madrid Seismic Zone will get triggered. Almost like wishing it. There are many "hot spots" in the world more important and more dangerous than New Madrid Seismic Zone. There is a tendency here in America to put ourselves as the center of the world.

New Madrid Seismic Zone will eventualy show serious activity someday, as part of the global changes taking place now; then we will have a million posts saying "I told ya".



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 04:57 AM
link   
Here we go again. A HUGE quake !!!! Ha ha ha

Ohhhhhh they had a GIGANTIC 2.8 in the last day!!!! was that it??????

How many times must these pathetic predictions come up around haarp.

It won't happen.


edit on 14-5-2011 by daggyz because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 04:57 AM
link   
reply to post by Trueman
 





New Madrid Seismic Zone will eventualy show serious activity someday, as part of the global changes taking place now; then we will have a million posts saying "I told ya".


Only if it happens within the next week. Otherwise you are right-it is an eventuality.



posted on May, 14 2011 @ 05:03 AM
link   
I have an important announcement.

There will be an earthquake some where in the world shortly. 9:16 UTC



new topics

top topics



 
71
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join