It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PinealGland
post removed by staff
Originally posted by PinealGland
Originally posted by kellynap43
reply to post by SatoriTheory
I wouldnt agree with the theory to slowly reduce population or kill off citizens. Why would the goverment due this when there whole power comes from the mighty tax dollar. With out citizens paying taxes, they dont survive. With that said, 49% of americans now dont pay taxes(welfare, social secuity, etc) Who knows?
Why is there a gigantic Stonehenge-like monument in Georgia in the US, that has etched on it, in 7 different languages, that 500,000,000 people would be ideal... I don't know.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by PinealGland
SIGH...
*Hurricane Katrina* was NOT the biggest, nor the worst "ever" hurricane in history....
But, someday....IF the technology ever becomes available, and reliable, then it would be nice to be able to mitigate such storms, to prevent them from making landfall, at least. Just, we do NOT have that ability yet....NOR to *create* them, either......
edit on Sat 14 May 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by firepilot
Originally posted by CouncilOfNine
reply to post by Chadwickus
I still fail to see why they would want to seed a sky that has no clouds in it!! After all as you said it is CLOUD SEEDING.
A lot of the trails seen are criss crossing the sky like a checkers board, and the problem being is that there are no natural clouds, just the so called "Cloud Seeding"
If there are no clouds, then it cant be cloud seeding. Cloud seeding is not about a blue sky, its a small aircraft that is used to fire flares inside of a rain/snow storm, trying to induce a bit more precipation.
The small planes used cant even get up to the jet aircraft altitudes anyways, nor is there the amount of moisture up there and its too cold at those altitudes too.
Many of you chemtrailers have no idea what cloud seeding actually is, and its better to learn more about it, than just repeating what other chemtrailers or chemtrail sites say it is.
edit on 14-5-2011 by firepilot because: (no reason given)
than just repeating what other chemtrailers or chemtrail sites say it is.
Originally posted by PinealGland
you can't deny that the frequency natural disasters has now gotten ridiculous.
Originally posted by weedev
I don't claim to know what is or isn't Chem/Contrails, seen this a few weeks ago though and thought it interesting. My opinion though is 'the jet engine' and that's why we didn't see them as often 40 years ago... Closing forums because they have ran a course might stop annoying some but take away for others that don't live on this site week in week out...
edit on 14-5-2011 by weedev because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by rallypoint
its time for genuine scientific proof to convince. we need airborne captured samples from planes, we need ground based samples and not just from one lake or tree or glass plate but across 50 states and other countries, we need scientific heavyweights getting behind the effort including the Foundation/Academia/University-complex which often is the gatekeeper of truth. We also need some whistleblowers and some kind of monetary contest to prove chemtrail theory is correct. As long as these do not see the light of day, this has no traction and no one who has the ability of making a difference is going to do anything. my 2 -cents.
Originally posted by Uncinus
reply to post by weedev
Minor point - but it's not just jet engines. Prop planes also make contrails - they just didn't fly that high, except during wartime.