Did the Dimona Dozen murder the Fukushima 50?

page: 1
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 12 2011 @ 06:57 PM
link   
Hello ATS'ers,
I did a search of this did not find a match....

I found this artical on the Fukushima accident.... I don't quite know what to make of it?
Is this another "wild story" or does this have validity to it? I have heard stranger things, but this says Israel is to blame for Fukushima... please check this out.... and I am curious if any "intellegent" ATS'ers can give some good feedback... True? False? Pluasable?
It has a lot of wild acusations... HELP!!!!



jimstonefreelance.com...




posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:00 PM
link   
wild accusations are just that... wild. theres not solid proof and thus i remain skeptical



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:04 PM
link   
I had to stop at the line "the destruction was so severe it could only be caused by a nuclear weapon". I laughed, then closed the page.

1)A nuclear plant is a nuclear weapon essentially. No, not a nuclear bomb, but a weapon nonetheless.
2)There are plenty of things that can cause extensive damage like this, not just a nuke. I am guessing this author has never seen a munitions explosion...
3)We saw the first explosions live. There was no external weapon used.

Sorry, calling bs on this guy.



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:06 PM
link   
I'm only about half way threw the article but this "Conspiracy" could hold some water.

I'll get back too you.

ALS



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:10 PM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


You really should read the whole article before calling BS, personally I think he could be onto something.

ALS



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by ALOSTSOUL
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


You really should read the whole article before calling BS, personally I think he could be onto something.

ALS


I cant take seriously an article that claims something HAD to be one thing when the FACT is there are HUNDREDS of things that could have caused damage like that.

I did go back and read a bit more, and I'm still unimpressed. To say that an unprecedented earthquake + a tsunami could not have done this is silly.

He does bring up some interesting points, but he is flat out WRONG on quite a few.



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:21 PM
link   
His Hummer looks like a little Tyota if you compare it to the trucks on the other side of the page. I think the guy is just bored and babbling



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:22 PM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 

Like i said it seems wild , but he says the "nuke" was a diguized camera placed inside the reactor??? I dont know much about this...thank you for the feed back.



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lost in america
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 

Like i said it seems wild , but he says the "nuke" was a diguized camera placed inside the reactor??? I dont know much about this...thank you for the feed back.



Here's the thing....why, if someone wanted to sabotage it, would they bother using an extremely expensive nuke? A high grade explosive would essentially have the exact same effect as a nuclear weapon in a situation like this. So why did it HAVE to be a nuke, as he claims? Why wouldnt someone rig up some sort of c-4 or something of that sort, which is cheaper, smaller, easier to conceal, cannot be detected as nuclear weapons can...etc etc etc.

And that is just the first issue I have with it....
edit on 12-5-2011 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:27 PM
link   
Another thing that doesnt add up is the timing....seems pretty damn lucky that they could have had all of this in place in PERFECT timing with the eq/tsun. Did they have foreknowledge?



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:34 PM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


There is in no way C4 could destroy a nuclear containment structure.

ALS



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:42 PM
link   
Wow, I'm really gonna try to pick this apart tomorrow as I don't have time to look things up right now. But that is alot to consider. There has even been theories of nukes causing the earthquake,.

I know something is up over there as I write this. Things are just not right, and they are just not telling us.

I'm pondering the release of Titrium in the Mississippi, and whether maybe Stuxnet is involved.



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:43 PM
link   
reply to post by ALOSTSOUL
 


Oh well this post fell off the "new list", prob dead now....I was hoping for more feedback...we will never know.....Thanks for the feed back everyone....



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by ALOSTSOUL
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


There is in no way C4 could destroy a nuclear containment structure.

ALS


You sure about that?



Thats 100 lbs of c-4.
You are ignoring the point. The point is, there are MANY explosives that COULD destroy a nuclear container. Yet this author claims it HAD to be a nuke (which can be detected by it radiation signature, btw, meaning SOMEONE would have known it was there).

Especially one that is damaged already. Not to mention the fact that there were MULTIPLE explosions spread across a few days that did the damage. It wasnt a single pop. So did they have multiple nukes in there?



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:57 PM
link   
This guy (the author of the article) seems to have a pretty healthy imagination. The problem comes in when you mix paranoia with an imagination like that. I suppose that would lead to quite a load of mental anguish. He spent too much time focusing on 3 mile island and not enough on chernobyl, which is a far better comparison. While I do believe that there is something very fishy about spraying water on reactors that have already melted down (proven to be a VEEERY bad idea) and a Japanese nuclear firm hiring an American specialist to handle their disinfo campaign, to state that nuclear munitions were at play there.....I mean....come on! I believe that the lobbying that went on to get those reactors built in Japan was absolutely profit-driven, and I really don't think that the Americans that were pushing their "yellow-cake" and MOX reactors (consequently the most dangerous kind) cared about public interest at all. There's one video I found on www.thecrowhouse.com, with a nuclear specialist talking about the events and what-not. At one point she said she took core samples of the supposedly solid bedrock that Daiichi was built on before the tsunami and she was able to crumble it between her fingers..pretty solid eh?
This is just political posturing and profit-driven ethics (or lack-thereof) at its worst, in my humble opinion. When it comes down to it, it doesn't really matter whether HAARP or nuclear bombs or superman took out Daiichi, the end-result is the same irregardless.
edit on 12/5/2011 by xXxinfidelxXx because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 08:10 PM
link   
Why do I find this so easy to believe?

It won't be Israel's first act of TERR-OR-ISM, by any count.
This is a rogue nation that has its finger on the button all around the world.

Well done, OP.



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 08:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Starling
Why do I find this so easy to believe?

It won't be Israel's first act of TERR-OR-ISM, by any count.
This is a rogue nation that has its finger on the button all around the world.

Well done, OP.


So, since Israel is a rogue nation, does that mean they are behind every attack, every disaster, and every natural disaster in the world?

Come on now....



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 09:08 AM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


Do not forget the following :

1. When the company is funded by the govt. for an important govt. job or cause, cost does not matter, perfect execution, efficiency and secrecy do. Another example is the US wars. The small nukes probably served as ignitors.

2. The company in question is a security commpany and NOT a construction company , it would not have been easy for it to bring in tons of any other explosives install them and hide them, at least not in a country like Japan. And it was not working at a simple facility where security was not important. Also, their shipments were not exempted from search.

3. Most importantly, you would not want the other explosives to be detected or traced in the debris. You want to make it look like "natural", do not you ?

4. As far as the tsunami and earthquake are concerned , there is a serious debate going on between scientists over if they are man-made weapons. I am sure you are not a scientist, so you should let the decision to them. You can google that for knowledge, though.

Thanks.



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 09:12 AM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


Not to belittle you or anything, But we saw the bombs planted in the WTC's Live & hundreds of thousands of people still think it was caused by planes.



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 09:50 AM
link   
Article on Reuters dated 5/12


"TEPCO seems to be going backwards in getting the situation under control and things may well be slowly eroding with all the units having problems," said Tom Clements with Friends of the Earth, a U.S.-based environmental group. "At this point, TEPCO still finds itself in unchartered waters and is not able to carry out any plan to get the situation under control," he said.


www.reuters.com...


Sound like the problem is far from over...





new topics
top topics
 
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join