It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange requires WikiLeaks staff to sign a confidentiality agreement that claims the organization's collection of leaked documents is "solely the property of WikiLeaks," according to a published report.
The confidentiality agreement says that unpublished documents leaked to the organization are "valuable proprietary commercial information, the misuse or unauthorized disclosure of which would be likely to cause us considerable damage."
The legal agreement was leaked to the New Statesman and published Wednesday [PDF].
Wiki-leaks, do-gooders looking to save the world, or just another corporate enterprise looking to make a buck, is a question people are bound to be asking once again.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
How frustrating.
It's funny, because we always want to believe in these sorts of organizations. Leaking valuable intelligence, evidence to validate our worst fears and sometimes phenomenal research.
I wonder if this agreement is reaction to the extreme attention they've drawn to themselves. Something less nefarious than what the evidence suggests would be great.
~Keeper
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Well they certainly seem to believe it is their exclusive commerical property once they come by it, as they make employees sign a statement saying that they agree with such and that they accept that civil suits might be brought against them if they leak any of the leaks.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I wonder what their employee parking policy is like?
Originally posted by Terrorist
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I have yet to read the full article, but the implications are depressing. However, I sincerely doubt Wikileaks has anything to do with an intelligence agency's whims. None of the leaks have made anyone look good.
What is the other "evidence" that Wikileaks is malicious?
Originally posted by On the level
I dont trust Assange or Wikileaks they are wolves in sheep`s clothing and seem to serve the main purpose of the further promotion of Assange and the Wikileaks brand. As I have said before the leaks have only hurt the people that took the information to Assange.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I wonder what their employee parking policy is like?
I didn't think Assange got parking in jail..
edit on 5/11/2011 by tothetenthpower because: (no reason given)