It is believed that Diana wanted the images of her and Dodi to go out to make her true love and secret love Dr Hasnat Khan jealous when he ended it with her. She had no intention of marrying Dodi according to her 2 best friends.

Who knows? Diana was slightly mad if you ask me, but that said, I do think she was murdered, and I for one cannot wait to see this documentary. A true conspiracy.

if anyone is interested,its not a secret at all,the movie ronin (deniro,reno) directed by frankenheimer features a chase through the diana tunnel.was controversial at the time.looks like a fast piece of road and not even a stretch to do it at 120+.pity she was in an s class mercedes,then arguably the safest car on the road,if it had been anything else she would not have needed a delay in treatment,she would have died on the spot

What's interesting is that Lady Diana's Brother Earl Spencer, is the Queens God Son.
And the blood line of Diana mixed with Charles' apparently produced a Son, William,
with the first blood mix of those 2 specific lines in a couple hundred years or so..

I find it astounding that both Princes are so forgiving about their Mother's death. Whenever you see this family its all smiles and closeness. Its surely somewhat unusual to wait 10 years for a enquiry into her death.

The whole situation is utterly unbelievable with some people cluttering up and waving their little flags at any royalty event still. I do wonder whether some of her future engagements might have had a bearing on her death, she was I think doing something on landmines and a trip to Gaza to see the children there.

I find this thread fascinating, however I am very surprised that nobody has yet pointed out some of the glaringly obvious errors in the background argument put forward by David Icke in his DVD and in the videos posted in this thread - for example, he claims that: (1) Paris was founded by the Merovingiens - WRONG! (2) Paris was supposedly named after the Trojan prince of the same name - WRONG! and lots of other nonsense about the geography of the city of Paris in the first millennium of the common era and worship of the moon goddess.

As anyone who has ever lived in Paris (or even any child who has read the Asterix comics) knows, the city was originally founded by the Gaulish tribe known as the Parisii (whence the city really got its name) and during Roman times it was known as Lutetia - the ruins of the Roman forum can be visited today on the Boulevard St Michel, and elsewhere you can visit the Roman baths and the ancient Roman amphitheatre (in rue Mouffetard if I remember rightly). Around 353 or so, the city of Paris was also the headquarters of the Caesar Julian, later to become Emperor Julian II (also known as Julian the Apostate). Quite obviously the city was not founded by the Merovingiens. It is also a bit concerning that Icke even persists in mis-pronouncing the term "Merovingien" - he called them "Merovinians".

While I find much of the other evidence presented by Icke surrounding the assassination to be quite persuasive, it concerns me greatly that he could make such incredibly stupid claims as outlined above without bothering to check their veracity - unfortunately this in turn undermines his credibility with regard to his entire argument.

However, the film Unlawful Killing is brilliant, and has done a great job of reviving interest in this tragedy and I hope that some day the whole truth behind these events will come out.

Hope is the best and last of all things. Without it there is only time, forcing us outward and away until it nudges us into oblivion..