It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What is happening at 37.75N latitude?

page: 4
51
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 12 2011 @ 11:52 AM
link   
reply to post by bekod
 


Just a note that bekod's previous post for California was of a 4.1 magnitude and certainly close to the surface.
edit on 12-5-2011 by LilyFlower because: Close to surface




posted on May, 12 2011 @ 11:54 AM
link   
reply to post by LilyFlower
 


12 May 2011 - 15:00
Fontanarossa Airport closed until 6:00 a.m of 13th of May.
Information above retrieved from the Fontanarossa web site.

Thank you for the link. the Info I found helped to clarify what I had observed, that it wasn't a massive eruption.
The airport however, was closed as a precautionary measure. As always, better safe than sorry.



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 06:14 PM
link   
Hi there. First of all sorry for bad English.
I have been lurking for a while, but i created account because of this:
Last night, i have been dreaming some volcanos erupting and stuff, and today i see this mount Ethna erruption !
Just wanted to share this.

p.s. similar things have happened to me before too.

cheers



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 06:41 PM
link   
reply to post by LilyFlower
 


I live like 5 minutes from Ft. Knox. Please don't scare me =|



edit on 5/12/2011 by banandar123 because: EDIT: Minutes, not miles.



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:26 PM
link   
I read something today that really put things into perspective for me. Everyday millions of people die from various reason. So every day is an apocalypse for millions of people around the world. Everyday is the end of the world for millions of people.

If you think about it. Over the course of 2000 years there have been billions of apocalyptic endings for people. Maybe 100's of billions if you include family members.

Me personally, I can't wait until a real doomsday even happens. This way I don't have to read about anymore apocalypses. I just don't want to die during a 1000 foot tsunami. That would be horrible for me.
edit on 12-5-2011 by LosLobos because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Flavian
 


You asked if there was any evidence of a physical pole shift of the mantel of the earth’s crust I would have to say yes due to the fact that there are red coral reefs off the coast of Alaska, and coral grows only in warm water. And if one look to the north in Russia you have evidence of wooly mammoths frozen solid with food still in their mouths which would suggest rapid freezing of that land that once produced buttercups and other foliage which today does not produce any foliage at all.



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 07:31 PM
link   
youtu.be...

sad but true!



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 08:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by MamaJ
reply to post by showintail
 


When the swarm in Arkansas began, I began studying EQ's. Its alarming to me that the swarm has slowed down tremendously in the last month. I wonder...why?



I do believe it is because the natural gas companies became concerned about all the complaints about earthquakes that they decided to stop the hydraulic fracturing to see if that was the cause...and since they stopped? Guess what, the earthquakes have stopped too....hmmmmmm



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 08:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by banandar123
reply to post by LilyFlower
 


I live like 5 minutes from Ft. Knox. Please don't scare me =|



edit on 5/12/2011 by banandar123 because: EDIT: Minutes, not miles.
BOOOOOOO

Dont worry,. be happy



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 09:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Flavian

Originally posted by AQuestion

Originally posted by babybunnies
I'd bet if you look at just about any parallel line around the world, you'd find earthquake zones along them in several locations.


Dear babybynnies,

Actually, it doesn't work that way. Faults run north to south, nor west to east. Why don't you show the opposite.


Surely faults vary depending upon the location of the fault line? Say for the San Andreas it would be north to south. However, the Eurasion and African plates run east to west and therefore faults would follow the same pattern?


Dear babybunnies (sorry I had a typo in the original),

I know the fault lines, they follow the plates, mostly North to south, some west to east. Plates are round and the earth is elongated. The land masses are more north to south. I apologize for having spoken in generalities. In the end, there is no fault line running near the 37th that is common, the quakes are happening at differant fault lines at their 37th, that is odd.



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 09:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Flavian
 


Dear Flavian,

Everytime I say shift, everytime, I am referring to a MAGNETIC shift, not the earth turning upside down. Sometimes I forget to type in MAGNETIC; but, didn't I make it clear in all the other sentences. Magnetic shift is what we are discussing. What happens when the magnetic shift occurs, it makes the inside of the earth, the molten magna shift, not the outside, it just impacts the wobble. As the magna adjusts on the inside, it will find the weaker links in the mantle and push up. Didn't Yellowstone lift ten inches?



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 09:53 PM
link   
reply to post by AQuestion
 


Good theory but the forces needed dont add up,, and too understand "Pole Shift" an Electric A.C 1/4 H.P motor from any electrical company works because of the effect of "Pole Shift",, N+ S- stuff,, and it does this at a rate of 60 cycles per sec. so it "shifts" poles from north to south using the attraction /repelling force too turn,, around a comutator which is in the middle and does not bulge or shift in size because of this action,,, that only happens when the lubrication/bearings get bad.

Hope this helped.



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 10:08 PM
link   
Reply to post by BobAthome
 


that analogy makes sense


but guess what is the lubricant in the earth's crust?

without realizing maybe you just backed up the theory you were trying to dismiss


 
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
 



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 10:12 PM
link   
reply to post by AnotherYOU
 


And being in the business for 20+ years u telling me i don't know about lubricants,, ;lol i remember when it was horse hair and bees's wax,, lol,,,



posted on May, 12 2011 @ 10:18 PM
link   
reply to post by BobAthome
 


Dear BobAthome,

I love it, that sort of makes sense and is directly in response to what I am asking. I don't understand the test you discussed, please explain the science theory, I am conceptual more than mathmatical. I think of magnets and can visualize using them to move one another. I know the earth's core is metal and fluid, fluids are easy to move and being metal would respond to magnets. I think I have this much science down (much better at quantum). If a strong magnetic pull was on the earth then it would be strongest on whatever part, that is basic geometry. I am wondering if it could be the part around the 37th and that would pull magna to new locations; but, it would be at the weakest link, the fault lines where they crossed the 37th. That is what I am wondering, I am not saying it is correct, I am not a geologists.

I should say that the only scientists as a group that I trust are geologists, no political agenda, its a rock and I work with geologists. I amy ask one of my geologist friends what they think of this question, they will tell me the truth, they are geologists, the only truth they know is rocks and that is pretty concrete and real.



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 03:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by guitarplayer
reply to post by Flavian
 


You asked if there was any evidence of a physical pole shift of the mantel of the earth’s crust I would have to say yes due to the fact that there are red coral reefs off the coast of Alaska, and coral grows only in warm water. And if one look to the north in Russia you have evidence of wooly mammoths frozen solid with food still in their mouths which would suggest rapid freezing of that land that once produced buttercups and other foliage which today does not produce any foliage at all.


Plates move naturally over billions of years....i am from the UK (north) and not far from coral formations on land. Indeed, a lot of the North Yorkshire Moors are remnants of ancient coral reefs. The UK used to be south of the equator. None of this is any proof for pole shift whatsoever, merely natural progressions of the tectonic plates through vulcanism, cosmic forces, etc over billions of years. Another example of this is the fact that in certain mountain ranges, you can find fossils for sea creatures - in other words the mountain tops were at one point underneath the sea. In a billion years time, the earth will look totally different to today and in another billion years after that, totally different again



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 03:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by AQuestion
reply to post by Flavian
 


Dear Flavian,

Everytime I say shift, everytime, I am referring to a MAGNETIC shift, not the earth turning upside down. Sometimes I forget to type in MAGNETIC; but, didn't I make it clear in all the other sentences. Magnetic shift is what we are discussing. What happens when the magnetic shift occurs, it makes the inside of the earth, the molten magna shift, not the outside, it just impacts the wobble. As the magna adjusts on the inside, it will find the weaker links in the mantle and push up. Didn't Yellowstone lift ten inches?


Dear AQuestion,

Apologies for taking your comments out of context, my bad. Would say though that there seems to be quite a few people on the various threads on ATS that seem to believe in pole shift. Whilst i am uncomfortable in trying to shape people's beliefs (we should all make our own minds up) i do think that sometimes people need to actually look for evidence of their claims.
With respect to Yellowstone, geological evidence and research shows that calderas rise and fall regularly so a rise of 10 inches is nothing to worry about unduly - it is simply the volcano "breathing". Of course, if it suddenly starts lifting in feet or metres then...........



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 04:29 AM
link   
Given there are several earthquakes every day of mag 5+ is it any surprise that over time, a few such quakes occur at the same latitude?

And given the Mediterranean is around the same latitude as Japan, it's impossible for quakes in these two very active regions not to occur at around the same latitude .....



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 04:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by Blarneystoner
The Tohoku EQ was at 38.322°N.... fairly close latitude.. reminds me of an old "debunked" torsion wave "theory"... platonic solids spin physics and wave forms.... nah...
edit on 11-5-2011 by Blarneystoner because: (no reason given)


Hitting the nail firmly on its head my good man!

The research done on this topic pretty damn good if I may say so.
but because its a 'fringe' science it is bollocks....

Check the latitudes away from the equator of Jupiter's red spot, Hawaii (basically just a bunch of volcanos) , Neptune's storm........all around the 33degree mark.



posted on May, 13 2011 @ 04:58 AM
link   
I live in Missouri, and as getreadyalready mentioned, the New Madrid fault line runs through our state, and does correlate with that latitude line. In the past few days several large sink holes have opened. One of them was large enough to pull half a car in with it on its edge. I know Missouri is riddled with caves, and sink holes are common here, but they are popping up more frequently lately. Hopefully nothing too major happens. I have two little nephews who haven't gotten to get out and do much living yet.







 
51
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join