It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Okay is this thread about the fact that this is a no-bid contract so the Governor can make money, or a discussion for/against welfare? I lost track.
If it's the former, then it's corruption, plain and simple. Regardless of his party affiliation, he should not be allowed to do this. Maybe his company can bid alongside other companies and make it transparent, but no-bid? No dice.
If it's the latter, someone has to do something to scrape the barnacles off the sinking ship of entitlements. Maybe this isn't the best way, but it needs to be done.
Facts about Rick Scott:
The short story is that Rick Scott invested millions in and profited from Emida, a company ‘that provides services that’ allow foreign workers to send billions of dollars from the U.S. home to Mexico and Latin America. Millions of immigrants, legal and illegal use these services to send billions overseas as remittances. The problem is, companies like Rick Scott’s Emida empower the illegal alien economy, motivating them even more to come to the U.S.
However, federal investigators found that Scott took part in business practices at Columbia/HCA that were later found to be illegal -- specifically, that Scott and other executives offered financial incentives to doctors in exchange for patient referrals, in violation of federal law, according to lawsuits the Justice Department filed against the company in 2001.
A few days before he took office in January, Scott moved his shares in Solantic Corp., a chain of 32 urgent care centers, to the Frances Annette Scott Revocable Trust. Scott co-founded Solantic in 2001 and was involved in its operation until last year. His wife's trust now holds enough stock in the private company to control it.
Solantic's walk-in clinics, clustered in mid-Florida and along the east coast, handle everything from stitches and sprains to school physicals and immunizations. Charges are posted like fast-food prices and there's a three-day feel-better guarantee — if you're not feeling better after three days, your follow-up visit is free. The company partners with hospitals in several markets, including Shands HealthCare in Gainesville.
By transferring the Solantic shares to his wife's trust, which is represented on the Solantic board by one of his former business associates, Scott maintains he is free from any possible conflicts.
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by MichiganSwampBuck
I know where you are getting at with that but please stay on topic. Much thanks
Btw, the camel through the eye of a needle is my favorite Parable
Originally posted by ldyserenity
Well most of the Florida residents are for this according to thier posts except one that works in welfare, which I say is self interest, because if there are less cases in the office, thier job may be at stake. All in the end we are the ones who will have to pay, Florida residents, not anybody else, so this if a majority of us accept it, then the rest of the world can STAY OUT OF IT!
Are you serious? How would she(and by she I mean him) not make millions? How is LABCORP the real issue? Where do you think these drug tests will take place? Not at LABCORP.
The article assumes the Governer's wife will make millions off the legislation, this is a smokescreen to detract from the real issue
Florida has just under 168,000 state employees, including just over 105,000 in the executive branch. For Rick Scott, that means nearly 170,000 new potential customers for his … sorry, his wife’s … Solantic walk-in clinics.
TALLAHASSEE – Gov. Rick Scott has announced a new policy of administering drug tests to all applicants for employment in state agencies controlled by the governor’s office, and random drug testing of current employees.
In an executive order issued Tuesday, Scott directed the agencies under his control to implement the policy within 60 days. He said it should “provide for the potential for any employee … to be tested at least quarterly,” including senior management.
But the ACLU of Florida said Scott’s order “attempts to resurrect a policy previously found unconstitutional by a federal judge in a 2004
… Howard Simon, ACLU executive director, said in a statement Tuesday, “The state of Florida cannot force people to surrender their constitutional rights in order to work for the state. Absent any evidence of illegal drug use, or assigned a safety-sensitive job, people have a right to be left alone.
“Coming from a Governor who promised to protect our freedoms by limiting the intrusive reach of government into our personal lives, this massive expansion of government power at the expense of basic rights is stunning and exposes the state to serious future legal liability.”
Scott has generated some controversy by proposing that recipients of welfare and unemployment be tested for drug use.
Critics say that idea is too expensive and impractical, but on Tuesday, a Senate committee moved forward a drug testing bill applying to welfare recipients.
Scott, in a statement praising the Senate committee and announcing his executive order defended both actions.
“Floridians deserve to know that those in public service, whose salaries are paid with taxpayer dollars, are part of a drug-free workplace,” Scott said in a statement.
Originally posted by ldyserenity
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Okay is this thread about the fact that this is a no-bid contract so the Governor can make money, or a discussion for/against welfare? I lost track.
If it's the former, then it's corruption, plain and simple. Regardless of his party affiliation, he should not be allowed to do this. Maybe his company can bid alongside other companies and make it transparent, but no-bid? No dice.
If it's the latter, someone has to do something to scrape the barnacles off the sinking ship of entitlements. Maybe this isn't the best way, but it needs to be done.
It's no bid because LABCORP is already contracted for this.
All the rest in the article is LIES AND PROPAGANDA.
I live in Florida, I know this first hand LABCORP does their testing. My friend was on probabtion, labcorp did her testing all state agencies go through labcorp!
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
I could see that as a possibility. I especially like the post asserting that Rick Scott is "getting rich off the poor" by providing them with health clinics where they can get medical attention. That BASTARD. How dare he provide a needed service to people and make money. I guess he should do it for free out of the goodness of his bleeding heart.
Scott would be wise to specify that Solantic be left out of any government drug testing contracts, advised Bruce Rogow, a Nova Southeastern law professor who has defended elected officials accused of public corruption. So far, that hasn't happened.
Originally posted by kellynap43
reply to post by MichiganSwampBuck
Is this bill illegal? Is it against the constitution? I say no. But again, I'm not a judge. That will be up for the courts to decide. Actually, its a brilliant idea. You weed out the the ones abusing the system, provide more work and jobs for a company who does the testing. Make goverment more efficent. I know, new concept, effficent goverment. It isnt something the current administration is great at, but that doesnt mean the states cant be more efficent. Which they usually are, except for states like California who are fiscally stupid.edit on 12-5-2011 by kellynap43 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by catwhoknowsplusone
Here is an idea.
Treat welfare recipients like everyone else.
If you are doing drug tests on them, do it to your so-called high fliers as well.
I think you will find out a lot. (sniff).
Originally posted by MichiganSwampBuck
There I was the first to use religion in this post!