It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Please try to learn the difference so you won’t get upset or worried over nothing.
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by Adyta
If instead you consult dependable websites like wikipedia and skyandtelescope you will find that Comet Elenin will come nowhere near the Earth.
Since when is Wikipedia considered a "dependable" site?
A study by the Journal Nature showed that Wikipedia is as accurate as the Encylopedia Brittanica across a wide range of subjects. In fact, the only time I see Wiki criticised is on ATS.
As an engineer by trade, I find that for scientific or other "factual" articles, Wiki is pretty damn reliable. Granted, pages about celebrities breeding habits might be wrong, but who gives a fudge?
Find me a scientific article on Wiki that is factually incorrect.
EDIT: As for the editting comment above. You can see who edited it and can challenge erroneous information, which is then reviewed and if found to be wrong, removed.edit on 10/5/11 by stumason because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by IndiGo33
Both Comet Elenin and Asteroid Apophis are real, but these concerns about collisions are without foundation. Unfortunately there are a few popular websites that are known for suggesting multiple catastrophes, including popularizing the 2012 hoax. Two that show up in any search for “Comet Elenin” are godlikeproductions and abovetopsecret, both of which predict either a very close pass by Earth or a collision.
LINK: astrobiology.nasa.gov...
Funny to see ATS forum getting mentioned
Originally posted by ZombieJesus
Thanks for the link, a little sanity is always refreshing.
I like the last sentence from the article:
Please try to learn the difference so you won’t get upset or worried over nothing.
I am sorry to most of you on this thread, but I do agree with the astrobiologist. Research and common sense seem to be very foreign ideas that waved by by long ago to a large amount of the membership here (not everybody, a large portion still remain very critical thinkers), not to mention the disturbing trend of people that seem to WANT the end of the world to happen.
edit on 10-5-2011 by ZombieJesus because: to remove i...literally, I had to remove the letter i from a word that did not need it
Lawyers lie, doctors lie, presidents lie. Astrobiologist can do that to. In this case
Originally posted by Seekeye2
Appears to me that this guy is just a tad too concerned about ATS influence. Now I wonder why?
Originally posted by Cobaltic1978
Wikkipedia is criticised all the time. People add garbage all the time. Anybody can edit and modify its content, in order to put their own slant on any subject. Sure you can challenge certain content, but not everybody does. Maybe because they know little about the subject in the first instance and are using this as a research resource.
Sorry I don't buy that at all.
Originally posted by Conciliatore
Lawyers lie, doctors lie, presidents lie. Astrobiologist can do that to. In this case
And lots of attention seekers, paranoids, schizo, mystics, can do it on ATS as well
Are you here just to troll or are you one of those people that will believe in conspiracies but not anything to do with NASA? (the moon landing hoax, for example...go check out that thread and the jihad being waged against anyone who dare question NASA).
Originally posted by Trueman
reply to post by stumason
Ok, I just asked my 16 years old son why he doesn't want to use wikipedia for his homework. He said theachers recommend not to use it since it's not a reliable source.