Originally posted by bjamison
This has confused me for years.
Apparently it was written 60 years ofter the death of Jesus Of Nazereth.
Now.
If the desciples were the same age as Jesus, at his death. they would have been 93years old.....
Call me a cynic, but hell, 2 + 2 is 4, ain't it
Your understanding seems to be relatively correct. There is definitely a temporal 'issue' regarding the oldest extant manuscripts and the actual
events they are supposed to discuss.
But firstly, keep in mind, the text in the old testament was written long before the new.
Also, there -have- been gospels, some proportedly written by disciples, that were outright rejected. Others were more controversially rejected.
Also, the catholic bible is different than many protestant bibles (and who knows about orthodox ones, well, besides the orthodoxists).
I beleive the general understanding is that the original texts are simply and understandabley lost. I also think that some texts aren't even
preserved in aramaic and the like, but rather greek and other languages (tho, to be clear, I am not clear on whether or not that means they aren't
the original languages).
If you look at it, most of the stuff in the new test. looks liek 'letters' to this community or that. So they weren't even intended to be compiled
into some sort of 'official' edition, which was done much much later.
I am editing this to add this link, this page is an excellent excellent resource for this sort of stuff:
www.tertullian.org...
[edit on 3-8-2004 by Nygdan]