It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn
reply to post by DaddyBare
lol where do you live so i can stay far far away. im a musician and you own more guns than I do instruments. you seems like a family that hunts so I understand owning some guns, but seriously now... how many rabbits do you need to kill....
c'mon...he has rabbits and squirrels all over the place...and they all need to be shot. 10 gun limit??? there should be no limit on how many you can own. it is our god-given right to kill as many animals as we wish, plus the occasional tresspasser. we are americans for christs sake.
lol finally someone gets what i'm saying! I have no quarrel with firearms being used for hunting, its just a necessity vs hobby thing. theres no way you need more than 10 firearms, for anything!
Originally posted by 1000TonBlocks
reply to post by OUNjahhryn
Hey buddy....I'm canadian too, and guess what, we got shafted.....we have No way to protect ourselves legally from enemy's foreign and Domestic.
The G20 gave us a glimpse of whats coming...better start running now
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn
reply to post by macman
outside of hunting. guns just make weak men strong.
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn
....people seriously own more than 10 guns? I live in canada and haven't even seen a gun aside from police officers and military...
I think the law should be "if you own more than 10 guns, get rid of most of them"
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
Originally posted by DaddyBare
reply to post by backinblack
but as I said... I bought most of them...
true I gave them to family members but do you really believe that would exempt me from this law if it went federal?
This would never go Federal, and if it did then we will witness many states using nullification to tell the federal government to go screw themselves, just like Montana did last year.
Originally posted by xFloggingMaryx
This doesn't seem like such a bad idea. After all, they aren't taking guns away from law abiding citizens, but rather, they are helping the citizens keep their guns away from those that will abuse them.
That's the biggest problem I have with the whole... right to bear arms debate.
Making guns illegal would probably be the stupidest and most dangerous thing the government could do. After all, making them illegal would only be keeping them from law abiding citizens. And it isn't the law abiding citizens with guns that are dangerous... It's the criminals with guns that are dangerous.
So by making guns illegal... we'll be arming the criminals and disarming the potential victims.
I don't really see how this arsenal law would be that big of a problem. It's not like they are taking the guns away - they're just making it so the guns will be locked up. And from what I know, most people lock their guns up when they don't need them, anyway.
I mean, I can see where having an alarm that notifies the police might be a little bit over-the-top... but I don't have much of an opinion on that.
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn
"neither do your instruments"
my instruments also don't fire metal at high velocity designed specifically to kill efficiently.
Also, if you read some more of my posts, you would see i'm not against owning guns for hunting.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn
....people seriously own more than 10 guns? I live in canada and haven't even seen a gun aside from police officers and military...
Get out much? I live in Canada and I have several guns... all legal... and I know lots of people who own guns, for hunting and competition.
Originally posted by OUNjahhrynI think the law should be "if you own more than 10 guns, get rid of most of them"
What about LIVE AND LET LIVE? Most Canadians need a reality check and learn what FREEDOM means.
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn
I don't think me wanting money being spent on starving children rather then an 11th gun for your collection makes me an elitist. an idealist and compassionate individual yes. elitist. no.
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn And for the person who said something about "don't tell us how to spend what little money the government leaves us" or something. If you have the money for 10+ guns, im sure your not hurting for cash...
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn oh and all those things you quoted me on. I never said I disagreed with the law in question. ie the topic of this thread in case you forgot. but if you would like my opinion on all guns laws. I think guns are unnecessary cowardly tools of death and should be destroyed.
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn As far as your constitutional rights go. You should be more worried about your freedom of speech than owning obscene amounts of firearms.
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn Somehow this has been turned into a debate about owning guns at all. Which I stated (in one of the posts you didn't quote) that i don't care if you have guns for hunting. i don't know how many times I have to say it before you will stop ignoring it.
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn I have expressed 2 views on guns in this thread which may have lead to confusion. my first view
1. guns for hunting is fine but 10+ is stupid and a waste of everything. this is my realistic scenario view.
my second view.
2. all guns should be destroyed. This is my utopian idealistic scenario view.
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn
my instruments also don't fire metal at high velocity designed specifically to kill efficiently.
Also, if you read some more of my posts, you would see i'm not against owning guns for hunting.