TSA pats down baby, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 9-5-2011 @ 10:22 AM by Maslo
reply to post by meathed



Ok, whatever, I disagree, and I see nothing sick about this at all. That said, I dont even support government intrusions like this (based on my political stance, it should be left up to the private security agency, IMHO). But it would be cool to let this law be in effect just to piss off overprotective parents that think they have the right to endanger everyone on board just so their child is not touched and that see sexual molestation behind every normal touch.. The only one that is sick is them.
edit on 9/5/11 by Maslo because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 9-5-2011 @ 10:36 AM by bekod
reply to post by Maslo

then you deserve full strip search, wire tap, mail and email, phone monitoring 24/7 for if you think like a terrorist you must be a terrorist. thinking babies could be bombs that is just sick sick sick



reply posted on 9-5-2011 @ 10:41 AM by bekod
reply to post by lambros56

yes the threat of using a plane is just silly if they want too and will some day a mall a shopping center, a train like they have done, or in a stadium were thousands could get it not just a few hundred, this years Superbowl full body scan before getting in!!!!!!


reply posted on 9-5-2011 @ 11:04 AM by UcDat
Originally posted by JJDoggie84
I just saw this article link on drudge
SHOCK PHOTO: TSA LOOKING FOR 'POOP BOMBS?'






I can't believe this... This is way over the top... I thought now that Obama got Osama we would be safer, right? Wrong! More pat downs for everyone! How's that hope and change going now?
edit on 9-5-2011 by JJDoggie84 because: added picture


yep the police state is here to stay. End it lol they are only going to escalate it official martial law next.

No way will this canadian ever go their with his kids tho honestly now that we got a harper majority wont be long till they set up shop here too.
edit on 9-5-2011 by UcDat because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 9-5-2011 @ 11:09 AM by Expat888
reply to post by Maslo



So are you former kgb ? ex-stasi ? Or a t(errorist) s(tate) a(gency) employee ? The state must be proud you spew the party line well..


reply posted on 9-5-2011 @ 11:40 AM by MrWendal
reply to post by Jubes



Whatever happened to the right to travel and be secure in your persons?

Right to travel info

Have you ever heard of the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution? I think it is safe to say, maybe you have not judging by your post. The Fourth Amendment says, "'The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.'
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alert: Possible Terror-related activity in NW Ohio
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
\'Bin Laden died of natural causes\'
  Posted 8 days ago with 17 member flags
Was it a drone that almost caused mid-air over Denver?
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags
US shadow war in Horn of Africa revealed by blogger
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags