Originally posted by coyote66
Of course i also know already, as a matter of fact, what kind of patriaritical, feodal, mysoginist ideals u are holding inside the odd club of yours (and no i'm no feminist, just egalitarian).

No you don't

Originally posted by coyote66
And yes i have no qualms AT ALL to violate the so called "word of honour of the brotherhood of men" (whatever that supposed to mean) in exchange for a greater good.

So you're a "ends justify the means" kind of guy.

Originally posted by coyote66
In fact i would go further then just ignoring meaningless words. And related to the "belief in god" i have also heard that one has to conduct an act of insult of their belief, in the form of spitting upon their holy book, in order to advance to the higher degrees in the society. CMIIW but since u havent through this, i assume it will also be pointless to demand a confirmation of this matter upon u? Is this another mistake on my behalf?

I'm just going to start calling you Phillip the Fair (sic).

Originally posted by coyote66
so is it possible for a lower degree mason to know the codes of the higher orders?

What composes the higher vs the lower?

Originally posted by coyote66
But why do i have a great doubt u are even a real member of a lodge?

I have a blog where I post pictures of my goings and in lodge. But I know that I am a member and my trying to prove it to you is not really at the top of my to-do list.

Originally posted by coyote66
And if u even were, i highly doubt that u might have genuine atraction toward women.

What a dick thing to say. Who are you to say what another man is attracted (it's spelled with two "t's") to. My girlfriends (past and present) would beg to differ.

Originally posted by KSigMason
Who are you to say what another man is attracted (it's spelled with two "t's") to. My girlfriends (past and present) would beg to differ.

Paging networkdude. Networkdude to the Secret Socities Forum, please.

Originally posted by KSigMason
Blast! Why didn't I see that coming?! lol Touche Augustus.

I think he should be more upset that you used the term 'current girlfriends', as in plural. You man-whore.

Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus

Originally posted by KSigMason
Blast! Why didn't I see that coming?! lol Touche Augustus.

I think he should be more upset that you used the term 'current girlfriends', as in plural. You man-whore.

Come on, guys. The only reason NetworkDude turned his head when you called "Sweetie" was because he thought you were offering "Sweet Tea".

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

so this is what happens when I go away for the afternoon?
Sad times indeed.

what is the purpose of this thread? we are are talking about something there isn't even there... maybe there is, but there is no longer any need to give any more details, thus the purpose of this thread is gone. why even start one..

Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus

You apparently hear numerous things but know very little. Rumor mongering only propoagates ingorance.

edit on 15-12-2011 by AugustusMasonicus because: networkdude has no beer.

Another thing i've also heard, since i got the impression u love the notion so much, is that freemasonry is about to be flushed down the closet. Thats why everyone is given the 32nd degree quite easily nowadays.

And remember its one year before 2013, and being the year of the dragon according to chinese zodiac too. (Most of u fail to see the corellation? Me no wondering)

And keep masturbating with 'rechtschreibung' guys, like u always did all along inside ur beloved lodges. Cheers

Originally posted by coyote66
Another thing i've also heard, since i got the impression u love the notion so much, is that freemasonry is about to be flushed down the closet. Thats why everyone is given the 32nd degree quite easily nowadays.

That would be the Scottish Rite you are refering to when you mention the 32nd degree, not Masonry itself. See how little you know? In my jurisidiction we have had four years of positive growth in the state and my home lodge is now over 400 members (from 350).

And keep masturbating...

Your advice seems to come from a place of deep and frequent personal experience.

Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus

That would be the Scottish Rite you are refering to when you mention the 32nd degree, not Masonry itself. See how little you know? In my jurisidiction we have had four years of positive growth in the state and my home lodge is now over 400 members (from 350).

Is that right? So where can i get all info about freemasonry or a particular lodge, so i wont know so litle about it, in the future?

Would u say its my fault when i know so litle about ur lodge/rite, as of it being a secret society by its nature?

Your advice seems to come from a place of deep and frequent personal experience.

very funny, did u learn this from ur lodge?

Originally posted by coyote66
Is that right? So where can i get all info about freemasonry or a particular lodge, so i wont know so litle about it, in the future?

Try contacting each lodge or Grand Lodge via telephone or using their respective website.

Would u say its my fault when i know so litle about ur lodge/rite, as of it being a secret society by its nature?

Yes, I would say it is your fault, as you make ignorant comments and statements while information is readily available. Lodges are listed in the phone directory, online and also have buildings which advertise their presence via signage and scheduled events.

very funny, did u learn this from ur lodge?

No, interviews with aquaintances.

CONCERNING A MASTERMASON'S CONDUCT AND RESPONSIBILITY
First, last, and always, remember your obligation as a Mason, any violation of which is a Masonic offense and may result in your expulsion. It is also an offense with like penalties: to visit any clandestine body calling itself a Masonic Lodge, but not recognized as such by the Grand Lodge, or to converse on Masonic subjects with any member of such an organization; Or to visit a Lodge whose charter has been suspended; or to solicit any person for the degrees of Masonry; or to use any Masonic emblem on a business card or advertisement except for some legitimate Masonic purpose; or to engage in any business tending to corrupt public or private morals.
taken from the code in my coded Mason book, then found uncoded in the "Manual of the Lodge".

Some snippets of the books I have acquired seem to implicate some "ATS Masons" as not following the rules, unless they have a directive from the grand lodge to justify or otherwise use masonic stuff without their express permission. Just like I'm doing, but I'm not bound by the rules of dudes in aprons.

It also implicates all Masons who "tend to corrupt businesses"

Originally posted by reverandrandy
Some snippets of the books I have acquired seem to implicate some "ATS Masons" as not following the rules...

Such as?

Originally posted by reverandrandy
CONCERNING A MASTERMASON'S CONDUCT AND RESPONSIBILITY
First, last, and always, remember your obligation as a Mason, any violation of which is a Masonic offense and may result in your expulsion.

This is true.

It is also an offense with like penalties: to visit any clandestine body calling itself a Masonic Lodge, but not recognized as such by the Grand Lodge, or to converse on Masonic subjects with any member of such an organization;

Right. Well ATS is not a lodge, and while there are some ATS Masons who would be deemed clandestine by my own grand lodge, nothing I have communicated with them on ATS would be in violation of that rule.

Or to visit a Lodge whose charter has been suspended;

n/a

or to solicit any person for the degrees of Masonry;

We're not recruiting here.

or to use any Masonic emblem on a business card or advertisement except for some legitimate Masonic purpose;

That is to keep people from using their membership for mercenary personal or business gain. Since all of us here are anonymous, a Mason on ATS showing his square and compasses isn't going to get any new business as a result.

or to engage in any business tending to corrupt public or private morals.

Augustus is about as morally corrupt as we've got here...

So I don't see any violations here.

Originally posted by JoshNorton
Augustus is about as morally corrupt as we've got here...

I thought about disputing that remark.