Hey all, thanks for replying, I will try to clarify what I can here.
reply to post by _BoneZ_
Hiya Bonez, if you check the time stamp on the contrail enhanced image, you would see it was taken at 1330 local time CA (+8 GMT, 2125 GMT) All
shots taken there (aside from the end of the gif image) are in broad daylight. The pictures do have time stamps, I thought they would be self
forming before daybreak on May 6th, and they remained through the entire day into the next night.
If this contrail in particular was frozen water vapors, as it should be, it would have been recognized by the enhancing software and not appear dark
but white or pink, like all the other contrails in the same picture.
Also just a personal note. I am well versed in IFR low, IFR high, SIDs, STARS, so the roadmap in the sky bit I'm well aware of.
I do agree weather modification and chemtrailing are not necessarily the same thing.
By the way, very cool contrail photo, thanks for sharing that.
If you look closely at the animated image, you can see half of this 'X contrail' still being formed as it progresses late into the day - Over the
course of over five hours. Normal flights can get from Hawaii to California in the amount of time spent on half of this X to form lengthwise, you can
also see that whatever is creating this may not adhere to any sort of flight plan on a fixed path, but are actively forming "with the wind".
Aircraft traversing the ocean do not drift with the wind but correct for it and certainly fly faster than what is creating these. I do not think it is
an aircraft using any sort of navigation technique going from point a to point b. Yes, of course contrails drift with the wind generally speaking.
Whatever is forming this series of contrails is sticking with this specific section of weather forming.
Oh, and they clearly begin at specific points, if these were normal contrails they should extend out somewhat
uniformly beyond the edge of the
image rather than abruptly begin forming a contrail miles wide, and they would certainly be enhanced unless they are not at high altitude nor
frozen water vapors.
reply to post by firepilot
Ok, I never said there was anything sinister here.
And they are closer to 60 degrees rather than 90, actually. Interesting maybe, sinister I
reply to post by ledzeppelin489
Not sure if you're serious but yes, of course I meant visible from
22,300 miles up. Thanks for the clarification though.
Anyway, I'm not saying there's a conspiracy here, nor am I trying to prove they are chemtrails as was earlier said, so going on a bout of chemtrail
debunking really is not necessary. As you debunkers have said many times, chemtrails have yet to be proven. My intent is to share what is in my
opinion a rare, abnormal contrail formation, and why it is out of the ordinary. For some though, I think the pictures might speak for themselves... As
far as debunking is concerned, you whom have been on a crusade to do so, your threads and comments are everywhere here and your points have been heard
Take care for now and Happy Mothers Day to whom it may apply.